/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 55 A shipment of 5000 printed circu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A shipment of 5000 printed circuit boards contains 40 that are defective. Two boards will be chosen at random, without replacement. Consider the two events \(E_{1}=\) event that the first board selected is defective and \(E_{2}=\) event that the second board selected is defective. a. Are \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) dependent events? Explain in words. b. Let \(n o t E_{1}\) be the event that the first board selected is not defective (the event \(E_{1}^{C}\) ). What is \(P\left(\right.\) not \(E_{1}\) )? c. How do the two probabilities \(P\left(E_{2} \mid E_{1}\right)\) and \(P\left(E_{2} \mid\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) compare? d. Based on your answer to Part (c), would it be reasonable to view \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) as approximately independent?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Yes, E1 and E2 are dependent events. b) \(P(E1^C) = 0.992\). c) \(P(E2 | E1)\) and \(P(E2 | E1^C)\) are almost equal, but not quite. d) No, it is not reasonable to view E1 and E2 as approximately independent, despite the slight difference in probabilities.

Step by step solution

01

Determine dependence

Event E1 and E2 are dependent events because the selection of a defective board (E1) affects the probability of the next board being defective (E2). This is due to the fact that the boards are chosen without replacement, reducing the total number of boards available for the second draw.
02

Calculate the probability of the complement of E1

To calculate \(P(E1^C)\), the probability of the first board selected is not defective, we need to know the total number of boards and the number of defective boards. The total number of boards is 5000, and the number of defective boards is 40. So there are 5000 - 40 = 4960 non-defective boards. Thus \(P(E1^C) = \frac{4960}{5000} = 0.992\).
03

Compare conditional probabilities

The conditional probability \(P(E2 | E1)\), which is the probability of the second board being defective given that the first board is defective, is computed by \(P(E2 | E1) = \frac{39}{4999}\) (since after a defective PCB is picked, there are 39 defective PCB left out of 4999 total PCBs).The conditional probability \(P(E2 | E1^C)\), which is the probability of the second board being defective given that the first board is not defective, is computed by \(P(E2 | E1^C) = \frac{40}{4999}\) (since a non-defective PCB is picked first, there are still 40 defective PCBs left out of 4999 total PCBs). These two probabilities are almost but not quite equal.
04

Evaluate independence

Given that \(P(E2 | E1)\) and \(P(E2 | E1^C)\) are nearly equal, one might think that the events E1 and E2 are approximately independent. However, approximately independent is not a recognized condition in probability theory. E1 and E2 are either dependent or independent, and as identified in Step 1, they are dependent events.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dependent Events
When discussing probability, dependent events are situations where the occurrence of one event affects the probability of another event happening. In the example of selecting printed circuit boards, events \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are examples of dependent events. Since the boards are selected without replacement, choosing a defective board first reduces the total number of defective boards available for the second selection.
This dependency alters the likelihood of the second event since the pool of remaining boards changes after the first selection. It is crucial to consider this in your calculations, as standard probability formulas assume independent events unless otherwise specified.
  • In cases where items are not replaced, like our circuit boards, knowing the outcome of one selection changes the probability landscape.
  • In practical terms, dependent events are common in real-world scenarios, highlighting the importance of understanding how one outcome can influence another.
Always clearly distinguish between independent and dependent events to ensure correct probability interpretations.
Conditional Probability
Conditional probability is a powerful concept that allows us to calculate the likelihood of an event based on the occurrence of another related event. It is often denoted as \(P(A \mid B)\), which reads as "the probability of A given B". In our example, calculating \(P(E_2 \mid E_1)\) helps us understand the probability of the second circuit board being defective, provided the first board was defective.
We derived \(P(E_2 \mid E_1) = \frac{39}{4999}\) because one defective board was already chosen, leaving 39 defective ones among fewer total boards.
  • Conditional probability reshapes our probability space and accounts for new information or events that have already occurred.
  • It's highly useful for calculating probabilities in complex situations where outcomes are not isolated.
Additionally, understanding \(P(E_2\mid E_1^C)\), where the first board is not defective, illustrates how different scenarios should be separately accounted for. Here, \(P(E_2\mid E_1^C) = \frac{40}{4999}\) due to no initial decrease in defective boards.
Independence in Probability
Independence in probability indicates that two events have no influence over each other's outcomes. When two events are independent, the occurrence of one does not change the probability of the other occurring. Evaluating this within the context of selecting circuit boards provides valuable insights.
In our problem, even though \(P(E_2 \mid E_1)\) and \(P(E_2 \mid E_1^C)\) seem close in value, they aren't equal, leading to the conclusion that \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are not independent.
  • True independence would mean that the conditional probabilities are the same irrespective of the occurrence of other events.
  • This highlights the importance of scrutinizing assumptions of independence as calculations heavily rely on these differentiations.
Recognizing independence or dependence is essential for accurately interpreting real-world situations and formulating correct probability models.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Good for Women, Good for Men, Bad for People: Simpson's Paradox and the Importance of Sex-Spedfic Analysis in Observational Studies" (Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine [2001]: \(867-872\) ) described the results of a medical study in which one treatment was shown to be better for men and better for women than a competing treatment. However, if the data for men and women are combined, it appears as though the competing treatment is better. To see how this can happen, consider the accompanying data tables constructed from information in the paper. Subjects in the study were given either Treatment \(\mathrm{A}\) or Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\), and survival was noted. Let \(S\) be the event that a patient selected at random survives, \(A\) be the event that a patient selected at random received Treatment \(\mathrm{A}\), and \(B\) be the event that a patient selected at random received Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\). a. The following table summarizes data for men and women combined: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 215 & 85 & \mathbf{3 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 241 & 59 & \mathbf{3 0 0} \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{4 5 6} & \mathbf{1 4 4} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? b. Now consider the summary data for the men who participated in the study: $$ \begin{array}{l|rrr} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 120 & 80 & \mathbf{2 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 20 & 20 & 40 \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{1 4 0} & \mathbf{1 0 0} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? c. Now consider the summary data for the women who participated in the study: $$ \begin{array}{l|rrc} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 95 & 5 & \mathbf{1 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 221 & 39 & \mathbf{2 6 0} \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{3 1 6} & \mathbf{1 4 4} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? d. You should have noticed from Parts (b) and (c) that for both men and women, Treatment \(A\) appears to be better. But in Part (a), when the data for men and women are combined, it looks like Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\) is better. This is an example of what is called Simpson's paradox. Write a brief explanation of why this apparent inconsistency occurs for this data set. (Hint: Do men and women respond similarly to the two treatments?)

The report "Twitter in Higher Education: Usage Habits and Trends of Today's College Faculty" (Magna Publications, September 2009) describes results of a survey of nearly 2000 college faculty. The report indicates the following: \- \(30.7 \%\) reported that they use Twitter and \(69.3 \%\) said that they did not use Twitter. \- Of those who use Twitter, \(39.9 \%\) said they sometimes use Twitter to communicate with students. \- Of those who use Twitter, \(27.5 \%\) said that they sometimes use Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom. Consider the chance experiment that selects one of the study participants at random and define the following events: \(T=\) event that selected faculty member uses Twitter \(C=\) event that selected faculty member sometimes uses Twitter to communicate with students \(L=\) event that selected faculty member sometimes uses Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom a. Use the given information to determine the following probabilities: i. \(\quad P(T)\) ii. \(P\left(T^{C}\right)\) iii. \(P(C \mid T)\) iv. \(P(L \mid T)\) v. \(P(C \cap T)\) b. Interpret each of the probabilities computed in Part (a). c. What proportion of the faculty surveyed sometimes use Twitter to communicate with students? [Hint: Use the law of total probability to find \(P(C) .]\) d. What proportion of faculty surveyed sometimes use Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom?

Many fire stations handle emergency calls for medical assistance as well as calls requesting firefighting equipment. A particular station says that the probability that an incoming call is for medical assistance is .85. This can be expressed as \(P(\) call is for medical assistance \()=.85\). a. Give a relative frequency interpretation of the given probability. b. What is the probability that a call is not for medical assistance? c. Assuming that successive calls are independent of one another, calculate the probability that two successive calls will both be for medical assistance. d. Still assuming independence, calculate the probability that for two successive calls, the first is for medical assistance and the second is not for medical assistance. e. Still assuming independence, calculate the probability that exactly one of the next two calls will be for medical assistance. (Hint: There are two different possibilities. The one call for medical assistance might be the first call, or it might be the second call.) f. Do you think that it is reasonable to assume that. the requests made in successive calls are independent? Explain.

A company uses three different assembly lines \(A_{1}, A_{2}\), and \(A_{3}\) -to manufacture a particular component. Of those manufactured by \(A_{1}, 5 \%\) need rework to remedy a defect, whereas \(8 \%\) of \(A_{2}\) 's components and \(10 \%\) of \(A_{3}\) 's components need rework. Suppose that \(50 \%\) of all components are produced by \(A_{1}\), whereas \(30 \%\) are produced by \(A_{2}\) and \(20 \%\) come from \(A_{3}\). a. Construct a tree diagram with first-generation branches corresponding to the three lines. Leading from each branch, draw one branch for rework (R) and another for no rework (N). Then enter appropriate probabilities on the branches. b. What is the probability that a randomly selected component came from \(A_{1}\) and needed rework? c. What is the probability that a randomly selected component needed rework?

A bookstore sells two types of books (fiction and nonfiction) in several formats (hardcover, paperback, digital, and audio). For the chance experiment that consists of observing the type and format of a single-book purchase, two possible outcomes are a hardcover fiction book and an audio nonfiction book. a. There are eight outcomes in the sample space for this experiment. List these possible outcomes. b. Do you think it is reasonable to think that the outcomes for this experiment would be equally likely? Explain. c. For customers who purchase a single book, the estimated probabilities for the different possible outcomes are given in the cells of the accompanying table. What is the probability that a randomly selected single-book purchase will be for a book in print format (hardcover or paperback)? $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} {\text { Hardcover }} & \text { Paperback } & \text { Digital } & \text { Audio } \\ \hline \text { Fiction } & .15 & .45 & .10 & .10 \\ \text { Nonfiction } & .08 & .04 & .02 & .06 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ d. Show two different ways to compute the probability that a randomly selected single-book purchase will be for a book that is not in a print format. e. Find the probability that a randomly selected singlebook purchase will be for a work of fiction.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.