/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 A family consisting of three peo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A family consisting of three people- \(\mathrm{P}_{1}, \mathrm{P}_{2}\), and \(\mathrm{P}_{3}\) -belongs to a medical clinic that always has a physician at each of stations 1,2, and \(3 .\) During a certain week, each member of the family visits the clinic exactly once and is randomly assigned to a station. One experimental outcome is \((1,2,1)\), which means that \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\) is assigned to station \(1, \mathrm{P}_{2}\) to station 2, and \(\mathrm{P}_{3}\) to station \(1 .\) a. List the 27 possible outcomes. (Hint: First list the nine outcomes in which \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\) goes to station 1, then the nine in which \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\) goes to station 2, and finally the nine in which \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\) goes to station 3 ; a tree diagram might help.) b. List all outcomes in the event \(A\), that all three people go to the same station. c. List all outcomes in the event \(B\), that all three people go to different stations. d. List all outcomes in the event \(C\), that no one goes to station 2 . e. Identify outcomes in each of the following events: \(B^{C}, C^{C}, A \cup B, A \cap B, A \cap C\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The possible outcomes for all combinations are 27. For event A (all three people go to the same station), there are 3 outcomes. For event B (all three people go to different stations), there are 6 outcomes. For event C (no one goes to station 2), there are 9 outcomes. The number of remaining outcomes depends on the precise definition of each of the other combinations.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Possible Outcomes

First, list down all possible combinations where each person can go to one of the three stations. This should give 27 outcomes as there are 3 options (stations) for each of the 3 people (\(3^3 = 27\)).
02

Identify Outcomes for Event A

Next, list down the outcomes where all three people go to the same station. This would be the scenarios where all three people go to station 1, or all go to station 2, or all go to station 3. This should result in 3 outcomes.
03

Identify Outcomes for Event B

Now list down all outcomes where each person goes to a different station. This would be the scenarios where each of the three stations has one and only one person. There should be 6 such outcomes.
04

Identify Outcomes for Event C

Next, list down the outcomes where none of the people go to station 2. This means all the people should either go to station 1 or station 3. This should result in 9 outcomes.
05

Identify Outcomes for other events

Finally, identify the outcomes for each of the following: \(B^C\) (outcomes that are in B and not in C), \(C^C\) (outcomes that are not in C), \(A \cup B\) (outcomes that are in A or B or both), \(A \cap B\) (outcomes that are in both A and B), \(A \cap C\) (outcomes that are in both A and C).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Outcomes
Understanding experimental outcomes is crucial for grasping basic probability. In probability theory, an experimental outcome is one possible result of an experiment. For example, when you flip a coin, there are two possible experimental outcomes: heads or tails. In the context of our exercise, the experiment involves assigning each of three family members to one of the three clinic stations.

An experimental outcome would thus detail the specific station each family member goes to, represented as a triplet like \(1, 2, 1\). There are \((3 \times 3 \times 3 = 27)\) such outcomes because there are three independent choices being made. When trying to list all possible outcomes, it's helpful to adopt a systematic approach. Begin with one variable, say \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\), and list all possibilities for them before moving on to the next family member. This way, you'll ensure you've covered every combination without repetition or omission.
Event Probability
Event probability quantifies the likelihood of a specific outcome or set of outcomes occurring. It’s calculated by dividing the number of ways a particular event can occur by the total number of possible outcomes. The probability of event \(A\), for example, is calculated by counting the number of outcomes where all three family members visit the same station—there are 3 such outcomes—and dividing by the total number of experimental outcomes, which is 27.

So, the probability of event \(A\) happening is \(\frac{3}{27} = \frac{1}{9}\). Remember, the sum of the probabilities of all possible experimental outcomes must equal 1, which represents certainty. This concept helps us predict the chance of various scenarios and is fundamental to many real-world applications, from weather forecasting to game theory.
Tree Diagram
A tree diagram is a graphical representation that helps in visualizing all possible outcomes of an experiment, and it's particularly useful for understanding compound events. Imagine a branching tree: starting from a single point (the 'root'), it splits into branches that represent all possible outcomes of a first event. Each of these branches then splits further to represent the outcomes of a second event, and so on.

In our clinic example, a tree diagram would start with three branches for \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\), each leading to three further branches for \(\mathrm{P}_{2}\), and each of those splitting into three more for \(\mathrm{P}_{3}\). By the end of the diagram, you'd have 27 distinct 'leaves' (endpoints), representing each experimental outcome. Tree diagrams provide an intuitive way to count all possible outcomes and can be very useful in calculating probabilities.
Compound Events
A compound event in probability consists of two or more simple events happening simultaneously. For instance, events like \(A\), \(B\), and \(C\) from our exercise involve multiple individuals ending up at certain stations, making them compound events. To derive probabilities of compound events, one often combines probabilities of simpler events using addition or multiplication rules.

In our scenario, event \(A\) (all members at the same station) and event \(B\) (all members at different stations) are particularly interesting. Analyzing compound events often requires understanding the concepts of 'union' and 'intersection'. For instance, \(A \cap B\) represents the intersection of events \(A\) and \(B\), and would occur only if both \(A\) and \(B\) were true for an outcome. However, since \(A\) and \(B\) are mutually exclusive (cannot both be true simultaneously), their intersection, \(A \cap B\), would not contain any outcomes. Such insights are crucial when assessing complex scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many fire stations handle emergency calls for medical assistance as well as calls requesting firefighting equipment. A particular station says that the probability that an incoming call is for medical assistance is .85. This can be expressed as \(P(\) call is for medical assistance \()=.85\). a. Give a relative frequency interpretation of the given probability. b. What is the probability that a call is not for medical assistance? c. Assuming that successive calls are independent of one another, calculate the probability that two successive calls will both be for medical assistance. d. Still assuming independence, calculate the probability that for two successive calls, the first is for medical assistance and the second is not for medical assistance. e. Still assuming independence, calculate the probability that exactly one of the next two calls will be for medical assistance. (Hint: There are two different possibilities. The one call for medical assistance might be the first call, or it might be the second call.) f. Do you think that it is reasonable to assume that. the requests made in successive calls are independent? Explain.

Suppose that a six-sided die is "loaded" so that any particular even-numbered face is twice as likely to land face up as any particular odd-numbered face. Consider the chance experiment that consists of rolling this die. a. What are the probabilities of the six simple events? (Hint: Denote these events by \(O_{1}, \ldots, O_{6}\). Then \(P\left(O_{1}\right)=p, P\left(O_{2}\right)=2 p, P\left(O_{3}\right)=p, \ldots, P\left(O_{6}\right)=2 p\) Now use a condition on the sum of these probabilities to determine \(p\).) b. What is the probability that the number showing is an odd number? at most three? c. Now suppose that the die is loaded so that the probability of any particular simple event is proportional to the number showing on the corresponding upturned face; that is, \(P\left(O_{1}\right)=c, P\left(O_{2}\right)=2 c, \ldots\), \(P\left(O_{6}\right)=6 c\). What are the probabilities of the six simple events? Calculate the probabilities of Part (b) for this die.

Define the term chance experiment, and give an example of a chance experiment with four possible outcomes.

The paper "Good for Women, Good for Men, Bad for People: Simpson's Paradox and the Importance of Sex-Spedfic Analysis in Observational Studies" (Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine [2001]: \(867-872\) ) described the results of a medical study in which one treatment was shown to be better for men and better for women than a competing treatment. However, if the data for men and women are combined, it appears as though the competing treatment is better. To see how this can happen, consider the accompanying data tables constructed from information in the paper. Subjects in the study were given either Treatment \(\mathrm{A}\) or Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\), and survival was noted. Let \(S\) be the event that a patient selected at random survives, \(A\) be the event that a patient selected at random received Treatment \(\mathrm{A}\), and \(B\) be the event that a patient selected at random received Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\). a. The following table summarizes data for men and women combined: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 215 & 85 & \mathbf{3 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 241 & 59 & \mathbf{3 0 0} \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{4 5 6} & \mathbf{1 4 4} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? b. Now consider the summary data for the men who participated in the study: $$ \begin{array}{l|rrr} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 120 & 80 & \mathbf{2 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 20 & 20 & 40 \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{1 4 0} & \mathbf{1 0 0} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? c. Now consider the summary data for the women who participated in the study: $$ \begin{array}{l|rrc} & \text { Survived } & \text { Died } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment A } & 95 & 5 & \mathbf{1 0 0} \\ \text { Treatment B } & 221 & 39 & \mathbf{2 6 0} \\ \text { Total } & \mathbf{3 1 6} & \mathbf{1 4 4} & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Find \(P(S)\). ii. Find \(P(S \mid A)\). iii. Find \(P(S \mid B)\). iv. Which treatment appears to be better? d. You should have noticed from Parts (b) and (c) that for both men and women, Treatment \(A\) appears to be better. But in Part (a), when the data for men and women are combined, it looks like Treatment \(\mathrm{B}\) is better. This is an example of what is called Simpson's paradox. Write a brief explanation of why this apparent inconsistency occurs for this data set. (Hint: Do men and women respond similarly to the two treatments?)

A company uses three different assembly lines \(A_{1}, A_{2}\), and \(A_{3}\) -to manufacture a particular component. Of those manufactured by \(A_{1}, 5 \%\) need rework to remedy a defect, whereas \(8 \%\) of \(A_{2}\) 's components and \(10 \%\) of \(A_{3}\) 's components need rework. Suppose that \(50 \%\) of all components are produced by \(A_{1}\), whereas \(30 \%\) are produced by \(A_{2}\) and \(20 \%\) come from \(A_{3}\). a. Construct a tree diagram with first-generation branches corresponding to the three lines. Leading from each branch, draw one branch for rework (R) and another for no rework (N). Then enter appropriate probabilities on the branches. b. What is the probability that a randomly selected component came from \(A_{1}\) and needed rework? c. What is the probability that a randomly selected component needed rework?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.