/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 An auction house released a list... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An auction house released a list of 25 recently sold paintings. Eight artists were represented in these sales. The sale price of each painting also appears on the list. Would the correlation coefficient be an appropriate way to summarize the relationship between artist \((x)\) and sale price \((y)\) ? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, the correlation coefficient would not be an appropriate method to summarize the relationship between the artist (which is a categorical variable) and the sale price (which is a numerical variable).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the correlation coefficient

The correlation coefficient, also known as Pearson correlation coefficient, is a measure of the strength and direction of linear relationship between two variables, in this case, between artist and sale price. It does not capture non-linear relationships or multiple categories effectively.
02

Interpreting the given context

In this context, the artist variable is categorical, not numerical, with eight discrete categories each representing one artist. The sale price is numerical. The correlation coefficient is best suited to explain the relationship between two numerical variables, not between a numerical and a categorical variable.
03

Answer to the question

Thus, the correlation coefficient would not be an appropriate method to summarize the relationship between the artist and the sale price. It does not take into account the categories of artists and cannot fully describe the possible variations in sale price between different artists.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why it can be dangerous to use the leastsquares line to obtain predictions for \(x\) values that are substantially larger or smaller than those contained in the sample.

Consider the four \((x, y)\) pairs \((0,0),(1,1)\), \((1,-1)\), and \((2,0)\) a. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient \(r\) ? b. If a fifth observation is made at the value \(x=6\), find a value of \(y\) for which \(r>0.5\). c. If a fifth observation is made at the value \(x=6\), find a value of \(y\) for which \(r<0.5\).

In a study of 200 Division I athletes, variables related to academic performance were examined. The paper "Noncognitive Predictors of Student Athletes' Academic Performance"' (journal of College Reading and Learning [2000]: el67) reported that the correlation coefficient for college GPA and a measure of academic self-worth was \(r=0.48\). Also reported were the correlation coefficient for college GPA and high school GPA \((r=0.46)\) and the correlation coefficient for college GPA and a measure of tendency to procrastinate \((r=-0.36) .\) Higher scores on the measure of self-worth indicate higher self-worth, and higher scores on the measure of procrastination indicate a higher tendency to procrastinate. Write a few sentences summarizing what these correlation coefficients tell you about the academic performance of the 200 athletes in the sample.

\(5.19\) - The accompanying data on \(x=\) head circumference \(z\) score (a comparison score with peers of the same age - a positive score suggests a larger size than for peers) at age 6 to 14 months and \(y=\) volume of cerebral grey matter (in \(\mathrm{ml}\) ) at age 2 to 5 years were read from a graph in the article described in the chapter introduction (journal of the American Medical Association [2003]). \begin{tabular}{lc} Cerebral Grey Matter (ml) \(2-5\) yr & Head Circumference \(z\) Scores at \(6-14\) Months \\ \hline 680 & \(-.75\) \\ 690 & \(1.2\) \\ 700 & \(-.3\) \\ 720 & \(.25\) \\ 740 & \(.3\) \\ 740 & \(1.5\) \\ 750 & \(1.1\) \\ 750 & \(2.0\) \\ 760 & \(1.1\) \\ 780 & \(1.1\) \\ 790 & \(2.0\) \\ 810 & \(2.1\) \\ 815 & \(2.8\) \\ 820 & \(2.2\) \\ 825 & \(.9\) \\ 835 & \(2.35\) \\ 840 & \(2.3\) \\ 845 & \(2.2\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot for these data. b. What is the value of the correlation coefficient? c. Find the equation of the least-squares line. d. Predict the volume of cerebral grey matter at age 2 to 5 years for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score at age 12 months was \(1.8\). e. Explain why it would not be a good idea to use the least-squares line to predict the volume of grey matter for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score was \(3.0\).

The paper "Effects of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) on Gray Wolves in Minnesota" (journal of Wildlife Management [1995]: \(565-570\) ) summarized a regression of \(y=\) percentage of pups in a capture on \(x=\) percentage of CPV prevalence among adults and pups. The equation of the least-squares line, based on \(n=10\) observations, was \(\hat{y}=62.9476-0.54975 x\), with \(r^{2}=.57\). a. One observation was \((25,70)\). What is the corresponding residual? b. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? c. Suppose that \(\mathrm{SSTo}=2520.0\) (this value was not given in the paper). What is the value of \(s_{e}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.