/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Data from a sample of \(n=150\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Data from a sample of \(n=150\) quail eggs were used to fit a multiple regression model relating $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { eggshell surface area }\left(\mathrm{mm}^{2}\right) \\ x_{1} &=\text { egg weight }(\mathrm{g}) \\ x_{2} &=\text { egg width }(\mathrm{mm}) \\ x_{3} &=\text { egg length }(\mathrm{mm}) \end{aligned} $$ ("Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width, Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thickness. Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors," International journal of Poultry Science \([2008]: 85-88)\). The resulting estimated regression function was \(\quad 10.561+1.535 x_{1}-0.178 x_{2}-0.045 x_{3}\) and \(R^{2}=.996 .\) a. Carry out a model utility test to determine if this multiple regression model is useful. b. A simple linear regression model was also used to describe the relationship between \(y\) and \(x_{1}\), resulting in the estimated regression function \(6.254+1.387 x_{1}\). The \(P\) -value for the associated model utility test was reported to be less than \(.01\), and \(r^{2}=.994\). Is the linear model useful? Explain. c. Based on your answers to Parts (a) and (b), which of the two models would you recommend for predicting eggshell surface area? Explain the rationale for your choice.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both the multiple regression model and the simple linear regression model are considerably useful in predicting the eggshell surface area, given their high \(R^2\) and significant P values. However, the choice between the two depends on balancing the slightly better predictability of the multiple regression model (due to its higher \(R^2\) value) with the simplicity and practicality of the simple linear model.

Step by step solution

01

Model Utility Test for Multiple Regression Model

To determine if a model is useful, we examine the \(R^2\) value, which represents the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variables. In this case, the \(R^2\) value for the multiple regression model is 0.996. This indicates that 99.6% of the variability in the eggshell surface area can be explained by the model. This suggests that the model is very useful in predicting eggshell surface area.
02

Model Utility Test for Simple Linear Regression Model

For the simple linear regression model, we not only examine the \(R^2\) value, but also the P-value associated with the model. The \(R^2\) value for the simple linear model is 0.994 and P-value is less than 0.01. This indicates that about 99.4% of the variability in eggshell surface area can be explained by the model. And the P-value, being less than 0.01, indicates statistical significance. Hence, indicating this model is also highly useful in predicting eggshell surface area.
03

Comparing and Choosing the Best model

Now that we have established that both models are useful in predicting eggshell surface area, it remains to decide which model is better. The multiple regression model has a slightly higher \(R^2\) value than the simple regression model (0.996 versus 0.994), which suggests it might explain the variability in eggshell surface area slightly well. However, the choice of model also depends on the complexity and practicality of the model. Multiple regression models take into account more variables, which can make them more complex and harder to implement. On the other hand, simple linear models are easier to understand and apply. Considering this, it would be recommended to further investigate the utility of the additional complexity introduced by the multiple regression model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Model Utility Test
When discussing a model's usefulness in statistics, we often refer to the model utility test. This test helps us understand whether the model provides significant insight into the relationship between variables. The key metric in this test is the coefficient of determination, represented as \(R^2\). A high \(R^2\) value, close to 1, indicates that a large proportion of the variance in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables in the model.

For example, in the multiple regression analysis of quail egg data, the \(R^2\) value was 0.996. This means that 99.6% of the variability in the eggshell surface area is explained by the model. Thus, suggesting it is highly useful. In contrast, a simple linear regression model with an \(R^2\) value of 0.994 also shows a strong relationship, explaining 99.4% of the variability.

Apart from the \(R^2\) value, the P-value indicates the statistical significance of the model. A P-value less than 0.01, as seen in the simple model, suggests that the model results are highly significant. Hence, the model utility test helps in validating the effectiveness of a regression model, allowing us to decide its practicality for predictions.
Simple Linear Regression
Simple linear regression is a foundational statistical method used to explain and predict the relationship between two variables. It models the relationship as a straight line, defined by an equation of the form: \(y = b_0 + b_1x\). Here, \(y\) represents the dependent variable, while \(x\) serves as the independent variable. The terms \(b_0\) and \(b_1\) are known as the intercept and the slope, respectively.

In the case of quail eggshell surface area, a simple linear regression was conducted with egg weight as the sole predictor. The resulting equation was \(6.254 + 1.387x_1\), indicating that changes in egg weight have a direct linear impact on the surface area.

While simple linear regression is easy to apply and interpret, its limitation lies in its simplicity—it only considers one predictor variable. Despite this, it's often useful as a starting point for exploratory analysis or when only one factor drives the response variable.
Predictive Modeling
Predictive modeling is a statistical technique that uses existing data to predict outcomes. This field capitalizes on patterns in the data to generate models capable of making informed predictions about an unknown future event.

In the context of the quail egg exercise, predictive modeling was conducted using both multiple and simple regression techniques. While the multiple regression model potentially offers a more nuanced prediction by considering additional variables such as egg width and length, the simple linear regression model is less complex, considering only one variable—egg weight.

Choosing between these two models requires balancing accuracy and complexity. The slight increase in accuracy from using a multiple regression model may justify its complexity if the variables collectively provide better insights. However, if simplicity and ease of implementation are prioritized, and if the additional variables in multiple regression yield minimal predictive difference, the simpler model may be preferred.

Ultimately, predictive modeling's objective is to choose the model that best generalizes the data for accurate future predictions, whether it be simple or more complex.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "The Influence of Temperature and Sunshine on the Alpha-Adid Contents of Hops" (Agricultural Meteorology [1974]: 375-382) used a multiple regression model to relate \(y=\) yield of hops to \(x_{1}=\) average temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) between date of coming into hop and date of picking and \(x_{2}=\) average percentage of sunshine during the same period. The model equation proposed is $$ y=415.11-6.60 x_{1}-4.50 x_{2}+e $$ a. Suppose that this equation does indeed describe the true relationship. What mean yield corresponds to an average temperature of 20 and an average sunshine percentage of 40 ? b. What is the mean yield when the average temperature and average percentage of sunshine are \(18.9\) and 43, respectively? c. Interpret the values of the population regression coefficients.

The following statement appeared in the article "Dimensions of Adjustment Among College Women" (Journal of College Student Development [19981: 364): Regression analyses indicated that academic adjustment and race made independent contributions to academic achievement, as measured by current GPA. Suppose $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { current GPA } \\ x_{1} &=\text { academic adjustment score } \\ x_{2} &=\text { race (with white }=0, \text { other }=1) \end{aligned} $$ What multiple regression model is suggested by the statement? Did you include an interaction term in the model? Why or why not?

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15\), calculated \(F=4.23\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=18\), calculated \(F=1.95\) c. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=5, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20\), calculated \(F=4.10\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=35\), calculated \(F=4.58\)

This exercise requires the use of a computer package. The article "Movement and Habitat Use by Lake Whitefish During Spawning in a Boreal Lake: Integrating Acoustic Telemetry and Geographic Information Systems" (Transactions of the American Fisheries Society [1999]: 939-952) included the accompanying data on 17 fish caught in 2 consecutive years. $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} \text { Year } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Fish } \\ \text { Number } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ (\mathrm{g}) \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Length } \\ (\mathrm{mm}) \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Age } \\ \text { (years) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Year 1 } & 1 & 776 & 410 & 9 \\ & 2 & 580 & 368 & 11 \\ & 3 & 539 & 357 & 15 \\ & 4 & 648 & 373 & 12 \\ & 5 & 538 & 361 & 9 \\ & 6 & 891 & 385 & 9 \\ & 7 & 673 & 380 & 10 \\ & 8 & 783 & 400 & 12 \\ \text { Year 2 } & 9 & 571 & 407 & 12 \\ & 10 & 627 & 410 & 13 \\ & 11 & 727 & 421 & 12 \\ & 12 & 867 & 446 & 19 \\ & 13 & 1042 & 478 & 19 \\ & 14 & 804 & 441 & 18 \\ & 15 & 832 & 454 & 12 \\ & 16 & 764 & 440 & 12 \\ & 17 & 727 & 427 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Fit a multiple regression model to describe the relationship between weight and the predictors length and age. \(\quad \hat{y}=-511+3.06\) length \(-1.11\) age b. Carry out the model utility test to determine whether at least one of the predictors length and age are useful for predicting weight.

The article "Readability of Liquid Crystal Displays: A Response Surface" (Human Factors [1983]: \(185-190\) ) used an estimated regression equation to describe the relationship between \(y=\) error percentage for subjects reading a four-digit liquid crystal display and the independent variables \(x_{1}=\) level of backlight, \(x_{2}=\) character subtense, \(x_{3}=\) viewing angle, and \(x_{4}=\) level of ambient light. From a table given in the article, SSRegr \(=19.2\), SSResid \(=20.0\), and \(n=30\). a. Does the estimated regression equation specify a useful relationship between \(y\) and the independent variables? Use the model utility test with a \(.05\) significance level. b. Calculate \(R^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) for this model. Interpret these values. c. Do you think that the estimated regression equation would provide reasonably accurate predictions of error percentage? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.