/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 When coastal power stations take... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

When coastal power stations take in large quantities of cooling water, it is inevitable that a number of fish are drawn in with the water. Various methods have been designed to screen out the fish. The article "Multiple Regression Analysis for Forecasting Critical Fish Influxes at Power Station Intakes" (Journal of Applied Ecology [1983]: 33-42) examined intake fish catch at an English power plant and several other variables thought to affect fish intake: $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { fish intake (number of fish) } \\ x_{1} &=\text { water temperature }\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right) \\ x_{2} &=\text { number of pumps running } \\ x_{3} &=\text { sea state }(\text { values } 0,1,2, \text { or } 3) \\ x_{4} &=\text { speed (knots) } \end{aligned} $$ Part of the data given in the article were used to obtain the estimated regression equation $$ \hat{y}=92-2.18 x_{1}-19.20 x_{2}-9.38 x_{3}+2.32 x_{4} $$ (based on \(n=26\) ). SSRegr \(=1486.9\) and SSResid \(=\) \(2230.2\) were also calculated. a. Interpret the values of \(b_{1}\) and \(b_{4}\). b. What proportion of observed variation in fish intake can be explained by the model relationship? c. Estimate the value of \(\sigma\). d. Calculate adjusted \(R^{2}\). How does it compare to \(R^{2}\) itself?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. For every one degree increase in water temperature, the fish intake decreases by about 2.18 (assuming all other variables are held constant). For every one knot increase in speed, the fish intake increases by about 2.32 (assuming all other variables are held constant). b. Around 40% of the observed variation in fish intake can be explained by the model relationship. c. The estimated value of \(\sigma\) is about 10.55. d. The adjusted R虏 is 0.37 which is slightly lower than the R虏 itself, suggesting that R虏 might have slightly overestimated the model's performance.

Step by step solution

01

Interpretation of Coefficients (b鈧 and b鈧)

The coefficients in a multiple regression analysis represent the change in the dependent variable (in this case, 'fish intake') resulting from a one-unit change in the respective independent variable, assuming all other variables are held constant. Therefore, \(b_{1}\) is -2.18 which means for every one degree increase in water temperature, we would expect the average number of fish intake to decrease by 2.18, assuming all other variables are held constant. Similarly, \(b_{4}\) is 2.32. So, for every one knot increase in speed, we would expect the average number of fish intake to increase by 2.32, assuming all other variables are held constant
02

Calculation of R虏

The coefficient of determination, R虏, which represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variables, is given by 1 - (SSResid / SSTotal). Using the provided sums of squares for the regression (SSRegr = 1486.9) and residual (SSResid = 2230.2) gives R虏 = 1 - SSResid / (SSResid+SSRegr) = 1 - 2230.2 / (2230.2 + 1486.9) = 0.40 (rounded to 2 decimal places). So, the observed model explains about 40% of the variation in fish intake.
03

Estimation of \(\sigma\)

The standard deviation of the residuals, \(\sigma\), can be estimated as \(\sqrt{SSResid/(n-k-1)}\), where \(n\) is the number of observations and \(k\) is the number of predictors. Substituting the provided values gives: \(\sigma = \sqrt{2230.2/(26-4-1)} = \sqrt{111.51} = 10.55\) (rounded to 2 decimal places).
04

Calculation of Adjusted R虏

The adjusted R虏 is calculated as 1 - [(1 - R虏)*(n - 1)/(n - k - 1)]. This is a modified version of R虏 that adjusts for the number of predictors in the model. Substituting the given values gives: Adjusted R虏 = 1 - [(1 - 0.40)*((26-1)/(26 - 4 - 1))] = 0.37 (rounded to 2 decimal places). The adjusted R虏 is slightly lower than the R虏 itself, which is often the case since R虏 tends to slightly overestimate the model's performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination (R虏)
The coefficient of determination, commonly denoted as R虏, is a crucial statistic in multiple regression analysis that measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable which can be explained by the independent variables in the model. It takes on values between 0 and 1, where a higher R虏 indicates a better fit of the model to the data, meaning that the model explains a larger portion of the variability in the response variable.

In the context of our example with the power station and fish intake, the calculated R虏 value is 0.40. This means that 40% of the variation in the fish intake can be accounted for by the predictors in our model: water temperature, number of pumps running, sea state, and speed. While this value offers some insight, it's worth mentioning that it does not necessarily imply causation and does not indicate which predictors are significant.
Standard Deviation of Residuals (蟽)
The standard deviation of the residuals, or sigma (蟽), represents the average distance the observed values fall from the regression line; in other words, it measures the typical error in predicting the dependent variable from the independent variables. To calculate 蟽, we take the square root of the sum of squared residuals divided by the degrees of freedom, which is the number of observations minus the number of predictors minus one.

In our example, with 蟽 calculated to be approximately 10.55, it tells us that, on average, the actual fish intake numbers deviate from the predicted values obtained through the regression model by about 10.55 fish. Understanding 蟽 helps in assessing the accuracy of the predictions 鈥 the smaller the 蟽, the closer the observed data points fall to the regression line, indicating more reliable predictions.
Adjusted R虏
While R虏 is insightful, it has a limitation: it can increase just by adding more predictors to the model, regardless of whether they are truly significant. This is where adjusted R虏 comes into play as it incorporates the number of predictors and the sample size to 'penalize' for the addition of irrelevant predictors.

The formula for adjusted R虏 takes into account the number of predictors (k) and the total sample size (n). In this fish intake study, the adjusted R虏 of 0.37 is a modified and more balanced measure compared to the R虏 of 0.40. The slight decrease from R虏 to adjusted R虏 indicates the inclusion of all four predictors might not be as beneficial as the R虏 suggested. Students should always consider reporting adjusted R虏, as it gives a more accurate picture of the model's explanatory power, especially in multiple regression analyses with many predictors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15\), calculated \(F=4.23\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=18\), calculated \(F=1.95\) c. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=5, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20\), calculated \(F=4.10\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=35\), calculated \(F=4.58\)

Consider the dependent variable \(y=\) fuel efficiency of a car (mpg). a. Suppose that you want to incorporate size class of car, with four categories (subcompact, compact, midsize, and large), into a regression model that also includes \(x_{1}=\) age of car and \(x_{2}=\) engine size. Define the necessary indicator variables, and write out the complete model equation. b. Suppose that you want to incorporate interaction between age and size class. What additional predictors would be needed to accomplish this?

The ability of ecologists to identify regions of greatest species richness could have an impact on the preservation of genetic diversity, a major objective of the World Conservation Strategy. The article "Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores" (Ecology [1992]: 1852 - 1859) used a sample of \(n=37\) lakes to obtain the estimated regression equation \(\begin{aligned} \hat{y}=& 3.89+.033 x_{1}+.024 x_{2}+.023 x_{3} \\ &+.008 x_{4}-.13 x_{5}-.72 x_{6} \end{aligned}\) where \(y=\) species richness, \(x_{1}=\) watershed area, \(x_{2}=\) shore width, \(x_{3}=\) drainage \((\%), x_{i}=\) water color (total color units), \(x_{5}=\) sand \((\%)\), and \(x_{6}=\) alkalinity. The coefficient of multiple determination was reported as \(R^{2}=.83 .\) Use a test with significance level \(.01\) to decide whether the chosen model is useful.

The authors of the paper "Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width, Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thidnness. Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors" (International journal of Poultry Science [2008]: \(85-88\) ) used a multiple regression model with two independent variables where $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { quail egg weight }(\mathrm{g}) \\ x_{1} &=\text { egg width }(\mathrm{mm}) \\ x_{2} &=\text { egg length }(\mathrm{mm}) \end{aligned} $$ The regression function suggested in the paper is \(-21.658+0.828 x_{1}+0.373 x_{2}\) a. What is the mean egg weight for quail eggs that have a width of \(20 \mathrm{~mm}\) and a length of \(50 \mathrm{~mm}\) ? b. Interpret the values of \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{2}\).

The following statement appeared in the article "Dimensions of Adjustment Among College Women" (Journal of College Student Development [19981: 364): Regression analyses indicated that academic adjustment and race made independent contributions to academic achievement, as measured by current GPA. Suppose $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { current GPA } \\ x_{1} &=\text { academic adjustment score } \\ x_{2} &=\text { race (with white }=0, \text { other }=1) \end{aligned} $$ What multiple regression model is suggested by the statement? Did you include an interaction term in the model? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.