/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 The authors of the paper studied... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The authors of the paper studied a number of variables they thought might be related to bone mineral density (BMD). The accompanying data on \(x=\) weight at age 13 and \(y=\) bone mineral density at age 27 are consistent with summary quantities for women given in the paper. A simple linear regression model was used to describe the relationship between weight at age 13 and \(\mathrm{BMD}\) at age 27\. For this data: $$ \begin{array}{lll} a=0.558 & b=0.009 & n=15 \\ \mathrm{SSTo}=0.356 & \text { SSResid }=0.313 & \end{array} $$ a. What percentage of observed variation in \(\mathrm{BMD}\) at age 27 can be explained by the simple linear regression model? b. Give a point estimate of \(\sigma\) and interpret this estimate. c. Give an estimate of the average change in BMD associated with a \(1 \mathrm{~kg}\) increase in weight at age 13 . d. Compute a point estimate of the mean BMD at age 27 for women whose age 13 weight was \(60 \mathrm{~kg}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The percentage of observed variation in BMD at age 27 that can be explained by the simple linear regression model is \(R^2 = 1 - (0.313/0.356)\). The standard error estimation is \(\sqrt{0.313/(15-2)}\). Average change in BMD associated with a 1 kg increase in weight at age 13 is 0.009. The mean BMD at age 27 for women whose age 13 weight was 60 kg can be given by \(y = a + bx\), i.e., \(y = 0.558 + 0.009 * 60\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate R-Squared

The percentage of observed variation in BMD at age 27 that can be explained by the model is the coefficient of determination, also known as \(R^2\). It is calculated as \(1 - (SSResid/SSTo)\). So, the \(R^2\) value is \(1 - (0.313/0.356)\).
02

Point Estimate of σ (Standard Error)

To calculate the point estimate for standard error, we need to find the root of mean square error. It is given by \(\sqrt{SSResid/(n-2)}\), where \(n\) refers to the number of observations. Hence, the point estimate of \(\sigma\) is \(\sqrt{0.313/(15-2)}\). The standard error measure tells us about the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Smaller value of standard error indicates most values are closer to the regression line.
03

Estimate the Average Change in BMD

The average change in BMD associated with a 1 kg increase in weight at age 13 is given by the slope of the regression line, \(b\). So, the average change in BMD for each kg of weight increase is 0.009 per kg.
04

Estimate of Mean BMD at Age 27 for Women Who Were 60 kg at Age 13

The point estimate of mean BMD at age 27 for women of weight 60 kg at age 13 can be calculated using the equation of the line which is \(y = a + bx\). Here \(y\) is the BMD at age 27, \(a\) is the intercept, \(b\) is the slope and \(x\) is the weight at 13. Substituting \(a= 0.558\), \(b=0.009\), and \(x=60\), we get the required BMD.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination
Understanding the coefficient of determination, often denoted as R-squared (R^2), is crucial when working with simple linear regression analysis. It quantifies the proportion of the variability in the dependent variable (in our case, bone mineral density or BMD) that can be explained by the independent variable (here, weight at age 13). An R^2 value of 1 indicates perfect correlation, while 0 means no correlation at all.

Using the formula R^2 = 1 - (SSResid/SSTo), where SSResid is the sum of squares of residuals and SSTo is the total sum of squares, we can compute the R^2 for our problem. The closer the value of R^2 is to 1, the better the regression line fits the data, implying that most of the variation in BMD can be explained by weight at age 13. Thus, this coefficient is a helpful measure of how well our model does in explaining the observations.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) in the context of regression analysis informs us about the typical distance that the data points deviate from the actual regression line. This gives us an idea of the precision of the regression coefficient estimates. In our exercise, we calculate the point estimate of the standard error by taking the square root of the mean square error, which utilizes the sum of the squared residuals (SSResid) and the number of observations (n).

The formula for standard error would then be SE = \(\sqrt{SSResid / (n - 2)}\), reflecting the average spread of the observations around the regression line. A smaller standard error indicates that the observations are more tightly clustered around the line, meaning our model's estimates are more precise. Conversely, a larger standard error suggests wider variability around the regression line and could signify a weaker model.
Regression Line Slope
The slope of the regression line represents the average change in the dependent variable (BMD) for every one-unit increase in the independent variable (weight at age 13). In simple linear regression, the slope coefficient, denoted by b, is a statistical measure of the strength and direction of the relationship.

The formula for calculating the slope in our example is straightforward: it's the value computed in the regression analysis (in our case, 0.009). This figure means that for every additional kilogram of weight at age 13, there is an estimated average increase of 0.009 in bone mineral density at age 27. Understanding the slope is vital as it helps estimate the magnitude of the relationship between weight and BMD.
Mean Bone Mineral Density Estimation
Estimating the mean bone mineral density (BMD) for a given weight at age 13 is done using the regression line equation. Applying the equation y = a + bx, where 'y' is the predicted BMD at age 27, 'a' is the y-intercept, 'b' is the slope, and 'x' represents the weight at age 13, we can predict BMD for any given weight.

For a weight of 60 kg at age 13, substituting the known values of 'a' and 'b' into the equation gives us the estimated mean BMD for a 27-year-old woman. Notably, this estimation has practical implications in the medical field for individuals and professionals looking to understand and manage bone health.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(13.26\) In anthropological studies, an important characteristic of fossils is cranial capacity. Frequently skulls are at least partially decomposed, so it is necessary to use other characteristics to obtain information about capacity. One such measure that has been used is the length of the lambda- opisthion chord. The article reported the accompanying data for \(n=7\) Homo erectus fossils. \(\begin{array}{llllllll}x \text { (chord } & 78 & 75 & 78 & 81 & 84 & 86 & 87\end{array}\) length in \(\mathrm{mm}\) ) \(\begin{array}{llllllll}\text { (capacity } & 850 & 775 & 750 & 975 & 915 & 1015 & 1030\end{array}\) in \(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\) ) Suppose that from previous evidence, anthropologists had believed that for each \(1-\mathrm{mm}\) increase in chord length, cranial capacity would be expected to increase by \(20 \mathrm{~cm}^{3}\). Do these new experimental data strongly contradict prior belief?

Reduced visual performance with increasing age has been a much-studied phenomenon in recent years. This decline is due partly to changes in optical properties of the eye itself and partly to neural degeneration throughout the visual system. As one aspect of this problem, the article presented the accompanying data on \(x=\) age and \(y=\) percentage of the cribriform area of the lamina scleralis occupied by pores. \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}x & 22 & 25 & 27 & 39 & 42 & 43 & 44 & 46 & 46 \\ y & 75 & 62 & 50 & 49 & 54 & 49 & 59 & 47 & 54 \\ x & 48 & 50 & 57 & 58 & 63 & 63 & 74 & 74 & \\ y & 52 & 58 & 49 & 52 & 49 & 31 & 42 & 41 & \end{array}\) a. Suppose that prior to this study the researchers had believed that the average decrease in percentage area associated with a 1 -year age increase was \(.5 \%\). Do the data contradict this prior belief? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a. 10 significance level. b. Estimate true average percentage area covered by pores for all 50 -year- olds in the population in a way that conveys information about the precision of estimation.

The data of Exercise \(13.25\), in which \(x=\) milk temperature and \(y=\) milk \(\mathrm{pH}\), yield $$ \begin{aligned} &n=16 \quad \bar{x}=42.375 \quad S_{x x}=7325.75 \\ &b=-.00730608 \quad a=6.843345 \quad s_{e}=.0356 \end{aligned} $$ a. Obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\alpha+\beta(40)\), the mean milk \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the milk temperature is \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) b. Calculate a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean milk \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the milk temperature is \(35^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) c. Would you recommend using the data to calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the temperature is \(90^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ? Why or why not?

An experiment to study the relationship between \(x=\) time spent exercising (minutes) and \(y=\) amount of oxygen consumed during the exercise period resulted in the following summary statistics. \(n=20 \quad \sum x=50 \quad \sum y=16,705 \quad \sum x^{2}=150\) \(\sum y^{2}=14,194,231 \quad \sum x y=44,194\) a. Estimate the slope and \(y\) intercept of the population regression line. b. One sample observation on oxygen usage was 757 for a 2-minute exercise period. What amount of oxygen consumption would you predict for this exercise period, and what is the corresponding residual? c. Compute a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the average change in oxygen consumption associated with a 1minute increase in exercise time.

The paper suggests that the simple linear regression model is reasonable for describing the relationship between \(y=\) eggshell thickness (in micrometers) and \(x=\) egg length \((\mathrm{mm})\) for quail eggs. Suppose that the population regression line is \(y=0.135+0.003 x\) and that \(\sigma=0.005 .\) Then, for a fixed \(x\) value, \(y\) has a normal distribution with mean \(0.135+0.003 x\) and standard deviation \(0.005\). a. What is the mean eggshell thickness for quail eggs that are \(15 \mathrm{~mm}\) in length? For quail eggs that are \(17 \mathrm{~mm}\) in length? b. What is the probability that a quail egg with a length of \(15 \mathrm{~mm}\) will have a shell thickness that is greater than \(0.18 \mu \mathrm{m}\) ? c. Approximately what proportion of quail eggs of length \(14 \mathrm{~mm}\) has a shell thickness of greater than .175? Less than . 178 ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.