/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Explain the difference between a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 13: Problem 33

Explain the difference between a confidence interval and a prediction interval. How can a prediction level of \(95 \%\) be interpreted?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A confidence interval quantifies the uncertainty in estimating a population parameter, while a prediction interval quantifies uncertainty in predicting individual future observations. A prediction level of \(95\% \) implies that 95\% of the time, the prediction intervals would contain the future observed value.

Step by step solution

01

Define confidence interval

The Confidence Interval is a range of values, derived from a given data set. It's devised in such a way that it may contain the true value of the parameter it intends to estimate, with a certain probability, usually \(95\% \) or \(99\% \). The Confidence Interval gives an estimate of the range within which the true parameter falls into with a certain degree of certainty (confidence level).
02

Define prediction interval

A Prediction Interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the value of a single future observation given specific levels of confidence. This interval provides an estimate for forecasting future values, and its width differs from the confidence interval. It's wider since it needs to accommodate future uncertainties and variabilities, along with the characteristic behavior of the data at hand.
03

Explanation of differences

The main difference between a confidence interval and a prediction interval lies in what each attempts to quantify. Confidence intervals quantify uncertainty in estimating a population parameter, while prediction intervals quantify uncertainty in predicting individual future observations. While the Confidence Interval is more concerned with the parameter (like mean, median, etc.), the Prediction Interval focuses on individual future observations.
04

Interpret prediction level of \(95\% \)

A prediction level of \(95\%\), which is the most common choice, implies that \(95\% \) of the time, the prediction intervals would contain the future observed value. Practically, in the context of a data set, if we produce a large number of prediction intervals, we can expect that \(95 \% \) of them would contain the future observed value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The data of Exercise \(13.25\), in which \(x=\) milk temperature and \(y=\) milk \(\mathrm{pH}\), yield $$ \begin{aligned} &n=16 \quad \bar{x}=42.375 \quad S_{x x}=7325.75 \\ &b=-.00730608 \quad a=6.843345 \quad s_{e}=.0356 \end{aligned} $$ a. Obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\alpha+\beta(40)\), the mean milk \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the milk temperature is \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) b. Calculate a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean milk \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the milk temperature is \(35^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) c. Would you recommend using the data to calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean \(\mathrm{pH}\) when the temperature is \(90^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ? Why or why not?

The employee relations manager of a large company was concerned that raises given to employees during a recent period might not have been based strictly on objective performance criteria. A sample of \(n=20 \mathrm{em}\) ployees was selected, and the values of \(x\), a quantitative measure of productivity, and \(y\), the percentage salary increase, were determined for each one. A computer package was used to fit the simple linear regression model, and the resulting output gave the \(P\) -value \(=.0076\) for the model utility test. Does the percentage raise appear to be linearly related to productivity? Explain.

A regression of \(x=\) tannin concentration \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L})\) and \(y=\) perceived astringency score was considered in Examples \(5.2\) and \(5.6\). The perceived astringency was computed from expert tasters rating a wine on a scale from 0 to 10 and then standardizing the rating by computing a \(z\) -score. Data for 32 red wines (given in Example 5.2) was used to compute the following summary statistics and estimated regression line: $$ \begin{aligned} &n=32 \quad \bar{x}=.6069 \quad \sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=1.479 \\ &\text { SSResid }=1.936 \quad \hat{y}=-1.59+2.59 x \end{aligned} $$ a. Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean astringency rating for red wines with a tannin concentration of \(.5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L}\). b. When two \(95 \%\) confidence intervals are computed, it can be shown that the simultaneous confidence level is at least \([100-2(5)] \%=90 \%\). That is, if both intervals are computed for a first sample, for a second sample, for a third sample, and so on, in the long run at least \(90 \%\) of the samples will result in intervals which both capture the values of the corresponding population characteristics. Calculate confidence intervals for the mean astringency rating when the tannin concentration is \(.5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L}\) and when the tannin concentration is \(.7 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L}\) in such a way that the simultaneous confidence level is at least \(90 \%\). c. If two \(99 \%\) confidence intervals were computed, what do you think could be said about the simultaneous confidence level? d. If a \(95 \%\) confidence interval were computed for the mean astringency rating when \(x=.5\), another confidence interval was computed for \(x=.6\), and yet another one for \(x=.7\), what do you think would be the simultaneous confidence level for the three resulting intervals?

Carbon aerosols have been identified as a contributing factor in a number of air quality problems. In a chemical analysis of diesel engine exhaust, \(x=\) mass \(\left(\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) and \(y=\) elemental carbon \(\left(\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) were recorded. The estimated regression line for this data set is \(\hat{y}=31+.737 x\). The accompanying table gives the observed \(x\) and \(y\) values and the corresponding standardized residuals. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}x & 164.2 & 156.9 & 109.8 & 111.4 & 87.0 \\\ y & 181 & 156 & 115 & 132 & 96 \\ \text { St. resid. } & 2.52 & 0.82 & 0.27 & 1.64 & 0.08 \\ x & 161.8 & 230.9 & 106.5 & 97.6 & 79.7 \\ y & 170 & 193 & 110 & 94 & 77 \\ \text { St. resid. } & 1.72 & -0.73 & 0.05 & -0.77 & -1.11 \\\ x & 118.7 & 248.8 & 102.4 & 64.2 & 89.4 \\ y & 106 & 204 & 98 & 76 & 89 \\\ \text { St. resid. } & -1.07 & -0.95 & -0.73 & -0.20 & -0.68 \\ x & 108.1 & 89.4 & 76.4 & 131.7 & 100.8 \\ y & 102 & 91 & 97 & 128 & 88 \\ \text { St. resid. } & -0.75 & -0.51 & 0.85 & 0.00 & -1.49\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lllll}78.9 & 387.8 & 135.0 & 82.9 & 117.9\end{array}\) a. Construct a standardized residual plot. Are there any unusually large residuals? Do you think that there are any influential observations? b. Is there any pattern in the standardized residual plot that would indicate that the simple linear regression model is not appropriate? c. Based on your plot in Part (a), do you think that it is reasonable to assume that the variance of \(y\) is the same at each \(x\) value? Explain.

Explain the difference between \(r\) and \(\rho\).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.