/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 The authors of the paper 鈥淩aci... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The authors of the paper 鈥淩acial Stereotypes in Children's Television Commercials鈥 (Journal of Advertising Research [2008]: 80-93) counted the number of times that characters of different ethnicities appeared in commercials aired on Philadelphia television stations, resulting in the data in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} \hline \text { Ethnicity } & \begin{array}{l} \text { African- } \\ \text { American } \end{array} & \text { Asian } & \text { Caucasian } & \text { Hispanic } \\ \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Observed } \\ \text { Frequency } \end{array} & 57 & 11 & 330 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Based on the 2000 Census, the proportion of the U.S. population falling into each of these four ethnic groups are \(.177\) for African-American, \(.032\) for Asian, \(.734\) for Caucasian, and \(.057\) for Hispanic. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportions appearing in commercials are not the same as the census proportions? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the data provides sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportions appearing in commercials are not the same as the census proportions, since the calculated Chi-Square Test Statistic of 19.52 is greater than the critical value of 11.34 at a significance level of 0.01.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Expected Frequencies

The expected frequency can be calculated using the formula: \( E_i = n*P_i \) where \( E_i \) is the expected frequency, \( n \) is the total number of observations and \( P_i \) is the proportion in the population for category i. The total number of observations is the sum of the observed frequencies, which is \( 57+11+330+6 = 404 \). Therefore, the expected frequencies are: \( E1 = 404*.177 = 71.51 \) \( E2 = 404*.032 = 12.93 \) \( E3 = 404*.734 = 296.34 \) \( E4 = 404*.057 = 23.03 \)
02

Calculate Chi-Square Test Statistic

The Chi-Square test statistic can be calculated using the formula: \( X^2 = 危 [ (O_i - E_i)^2 / E_i ] \) where \( O_i \) is the observed frequency and \( E_i \) is the expected frequency for category i. The calculated value of X^2 is: \( X^2 = (57 - 71.51)^2 / 71.51 + (11 - 12.93)^2 / 12.93 + (330 - 296.34)^2 / 296.34 + (6 - 23.03)^2 / 23.03 = 2.99 + 0.29 + 3.58 + 12.66 = 19.52 \)
03

Determine Critical Value and Make Decision

The critical value can be found using Chi-Square distribution table. With a significance level of .01 and df = 4-1 = 3, the critical value is 11.34. Since the calculated test statistic 19.52 is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected. This indicates that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportions appearing in commercials are not the same as the census proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test
The Chi-Square Test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies in categorical data. This test helps evaluate whether differences between categories arise from chance or some specific factors.
It is often used when dealing with population proportions to check if the witnessed data align with expected ratios. In this particular context, we use the Chi-Square Test to compare the proportions of ethnic groups in TV commercials against census data.
To conduct the test, follow these steps:
  • Calculate expected frequencies for each category based on known population proportions and total observations.
  • Use the formula \( X^2 = \sum \left( \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \right) \), where \(O_i\) are observed frequencies and \(E_i\) are expected frequencies. This gives the Chi-Square statistic.
  • Find the critical value using the Chi-Square distribution table, with degrees of freedom \( df = \,\text{(number of categories)} - 1 \) and the specified significance level.
If the calculated statistic exceeds the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant difference between what is observed and what is expected. This means the TV commercial proportions deviate significantly from the census proportions.
Observed Frequencies
Observed Frequencies refer to the actual counts of occurrences that you find in your sample data. In our exercise, these are the numbers representing how often characters of different ethnic backgrounds appear in TV commercials.
These raw data points are crucial because they offer a real-world sample that we can analyze. Here, we have 57 African-American, 11 Asian, 330 Caucasian, and 6 Hispanic appearances.
The observed frequencies provide the basis for analysis, as they are compared against expected frequencies derived from another data source鈥攊n this case, census data鈥攗sing the Chi-Square Test.
The goal is to assess how well these observed frequencies align with population-based expectations. Discrepancies may indicate a deviation influenced by factors such as societal bias or under-representation, warranting further examination.
Census Proportions
The term 'Census Proportions' refers to the distribution of certain demographic characteristics as recorded in a census, typically conducted by a governmental entity. These proportions are used as benchmarks for expected distributions in various studies.
In our scenario, the proportions for different ethnic groups are drawn from the 2000 U.S. Census data:
  • African-American: 17.7%
  • Asian: 3.2%
  • Caucasian: 73.4%
  • Hispanic: 5.7%
These percentages form the basis for calculating expected frequencies in the Chi-Square Test. By applying these proportions to the total number of observed characters (404), we establish a baseline for comparison.
Accurate census proportions are critical because they provide a scientifically collected standard reference. Any derivation in commercial representations implies potential disparities that might prompt broader societal discussions or actions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Each person in a large sample of German adolescents was asked to indicate which of 50 popular movies they had seen in the past year. Based on the response, the amount of time (in minutes) of alcohol use contained in the movies the person had watched was estimated. Each person was then classified into one of four groups based on the amount of movie alcohol exposure (groups \(1,2,3\), and 4 , with 1 being the lowest exposure and 4 being the highest exposure). Each person was also classified according to school performance. The resulting data is given in the accompanying table (from "Longitudinal Study of Exposure to Entertainment Media and Alcohol Use among German Adolescents," Pediatrics [2009]: \(989-995\) ). Assume it is reasonable to regard this sample as a random sample of German adolescents. Is there evidence that there is an association between school performance and movie exposure to alcohol? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.05\). $$ \begin{array}{l|lcrrr} & & \text { Alcohol Exposure } \\ & & \text { Group } \\ \hline & & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \text { School Performance } & \text { Excellent } & 110 & 93 & 49 & 65 \\\ & \text { Good } & 328 & 325 & 316 & 295 \\ & \text { Average/Poor } & 239 & 259 & 312 & 317 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

A certain genetic characteristic of a particular plant can appear in one of three forms (phenotypes). A researcher has developed a theory, according to which the hypothesized proportions are \(p_{1}=.25, p_{2}=.50\), and \(p_{3}=.25 .\) A random sample of 200 plants yields \(X^{2}=\) \(4.63 .\) a. Carry out a test of the null hypothesis that the theory is correct, using level of significance \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose that a random sample of 300 plants had resulted in the same value of \(X^{2}\). How would your analysis and conclusion differ from those in Part (a)?

Drivers born under the astrological sign of Capricorn are the worst drivers in Australia, according to an article that appeared in the Australian newspaper The Mercury (October 26,1998 ). This statement was based on a study of insurance claims that resulted in the following data for male policyholders of a large insurance company. $$ \begin{array}{lc} \text { Astrological Sign } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Policyholders } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Aquarius } & 35,666 \\ \text { Aries } & 37,926 \\ \text { Cancer } & 38,126 \\ \text { Capricorn } & 54,906 \\ \text { Gemini } & 37,179 \\ \text { Leo } & 37,354 \\ \text { Libra } & 37,910 \\ \text { Pisces } & 36,677 \\ \text { Sagittarius } & 34,175 \\ \text { Scorpio } & 35,352 \\ \text { Taurus } & 37,179 \\ \text { Virgo } & 37,718 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that it is reasonable to treat the male policyholders of this particular insurance company as a random sample of male insured drivers in Australia, are the observed data consistent with the hypothesis that the proportion of male insured drivers is the same for each of the 12 astrological signs? b. Why do you think that the proportion of Capricorn policyholders is so much higher than would be expected if the proportions are the same for all astrological signs? c. Suppose that a random sample of 1000 accident claims submitted to this insurance company is selected and each claim classified according to the astrological sign of the driver. (The accompanying table is consistent with accident rates given in the article.) $$ \begin{array}{lc} & \text { Observed Number } \\ \text { Astrological Sign } & \text { in Sample } \\ \hline \text { Aquarius } & 85 \\ \text { Aries } & 83 \\ \text { Cancer } & 82 \\ \text { Capricorn } & 88 \\ \text { Gemini } & 83 \\ \text { Leo } & 83 \\ \text { Libra } & 83 \\ \text { Pisces } & 82 \\ \text { Sagittarius } & 81 \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lc} & \text { Observed Number } \\ \text { Astrological Sign } & \text { in Sample } \\ \hline \text { Scorpio } & 85 \\ \text { Taurus } & 84 \\ \text { Virgo } & 81 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Test the null hypothesis that the proportion of accident claims submitted by drivers of each astrological sign is consistent with the proportion of policyholders of each sign. Use the given information on the distribution of policyholders to compute expected frequencies and then carry out an appropriate test.

A survey was conducted in the San Francisco Bay area in which each participating individual was classified according to the type of vehicle used most often and city of residence. A subset of the resulting data are given in the accompanying table (The Relationship of Vehicle Type Choice to Personality. Lifestyle, Attitudinal and Demographic Variables, Technical Report UCD-ITS-RRO2-06, DaimlerCrysler Corp., 2002). $$ \begin{array}{l|crc} & & \text { City } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Vehide } \\ \text { Type } \end{array} & \text { Concord } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Pleasant } \\ \text { Hills } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { North San } \\ \text { Francisco } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Small } & 68 & 83 & 221 \\ \text { Compact } & 63 & 68 & 106 \\ \text { Midsize } & 88 & 123 & 142 \\ \text { Large } & 24 & 18 & 11 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do the data provide convincing evidence of an association between city of residence and vehicle type? Use a significance level of \(.05 .\) You may assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample as a random sample of Bay area residents.

A particular paperback book is published in a choice of four different covers. A certain bookstore keeps copies of each cover on its racks. To test the hypothesis that sales are equally divided among the four choices, a random sample of 100 purchases is identified. a. If the resulting \(X^{2}\) value were \(6.4\), what conclusion would you reach when using a test with significance level .05? b. What conclusion would be appropriate at significance level \(.01\) if \(X^{2}=15.3\) ? c. If there were six different covers rather than just four, what would you conclude if \(X^{2}=13.7\) and a test with \(\alpha=.05\) was used?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.