/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 49 The paper "Effects of Canine Par... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Effects of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) on Gray Wolves in Minnesota" (Journal of Wildlife Management \([1995]: 565-570\) ) summarized a regression of \(y=\) percentage of pups in a capture on \(x=\) percentage of \(\mathrm{CPV}\) prevalence among adults and pups. The equation of the least-squares line, based on \(n=10\) observations, was \(\hat{y}=62.9476-0.54975 x\), with \(r^{2}=.57\) a. One observation was \((25,70)\). What is the corresponding residual? b. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? c. Suppose that \(\mathrm{SSTo}=2520.0\) (this value was not given in the paper). What is the value of \(s_{e} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The corresponding residual for the observation (25,70) is 20.29. b. The value of the sample correlation coefficient is -0.75. c. The value of \(s_{e}\) is 11.674.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the residual for the observation (25,70)

Residual is calculated by subtracting the predicted value from the actual value. The equation of the line is given by \( \hat{y} = 62.9476 - 0.54975x \) from the exercise. Let's substitute \(x = 25\) into the equation to find the predicted value (\(\hat{y}\)): \(\hat{y} = 62.9476 - 0.54975*25 = 49.71 \). The actual value (\(y\)) for \(x = 25\) is 70. Hence, the residual is \(y - \hat{y} = 70 - 49.71 = 20.29 \)
02

Determine the value for correlation coefficient

The value of the square of the correlation coefficient (\(r^2\)) is given as 0.57 in the exercise. So, the correlation coefficient (\(r\)) is \(\sqrt{0.57}\) or - \(\sqrt{0.57}\). As we have a negative slope in the regression equation, we will take the negative root which gives \(r = -0.75\).
03

Compute the value for standard error (\(s_{e}\))

Standard error (\(s_{e}\)) is calculated by taking the square root of the residual sum of squares (SSR) divided by the degrees of freedom. The value of SSR can be calculated using the given value of total sum of squares (SSTo) and \(r^{2}\). SSR = SSTo*(1-\(r^{2}\)). plugging in the values, we get, SSR = 2520.0*(1-0.57) = 1084.40. As there are 10 observations, the degrees of freedom would be n-2=10-2=8. Let's substitute these values in the \(s_{e}\) equation: \(s_{e} = \sqrt{SSR/degree\ of\ freedom} = \sqrt{1084.40/8} = 11.674.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Residual Calculation
Residuals are important in linear regression because they show how far the actual data points deviate from the predicted values on the regression line. These deviations are expressed as differences. To calculate a residual, subtract the predicted value from the actual observed value. In this exercise, we have the equation of a regression line:
  • \( \hat{y} = 62.9476 - 0.54975x \)
Let's take an observation with actual values of \(x = 25\) and \(y = 70\). We substitute \(x = 25\) into the equation to find the predicted \(\hat{y}\). Hence, the predicted value \(\hat{y}\) is:
  • \( \hat{y} = 62.9476 - 0.54975 \times 25 = 49.71 \)
The residual is calculated by subtracting this predicted value from the actual observed value, \(y = 70\). Therefore, the residual is:
  • \( y - \hat{y} = 70 - 49.71 = 20.29 \)
Understanding residuals helps to improve the regression model by identifying potential outliers or suggesting modifications to the regression model, such as changing the model form or removing outliers.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, denoted by \(r\), measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, where values close to 1 or -1 indicate a strong relationship, and a value close to 0 suggests a weak linear relationship. In this exercise, we start with the coefficient of determination, \(r^2 = 0.57\), which tells us that 57% of the variability in the percentage of pups captured can be explained by the prevalence of CPV.To find \(r\), we take the square root of \(r^2\). Given \(r^2 = 0.57\), then:
  • \( r = \pm \sqrt{0.57} \)
  • \( r \approx \pm 0.75 \)
Since the slope of the regression line is negative, indicating that as the percentage of CPV increases, the percentage of captured pups decreases, we use the negative root. Hence, \(r = -0.75\), revealing a moderate negative correlation. This means as the CPV prevalence increases, there is a tendency for the pup capture percentage to decrease.
Standard Error of Regression
The standard error of regression is a measure of the accuracy with which a regression line predicts the data points. It provides an estimate of the standard deviation of the residuals or how much the observed values differ from the predicted values, on average. To compute the standard error \(s_{e}\), we use the residual sum of squares (SSR) and divide it by the degrees of freedom, take its square root.We know:
  • The total sum of squares \(SSTo = 2520.0\)
  • The coefficient of determination \(r^2 = 0.57\)
First, calculate the residual sum of squares (SSR) using the formula:
  • \( SSR = SSTo \times (1- r^2) = 2520.0 \times (1 - 0.57) = 1084.40 \)
With 10 observations, the degrees of freedom are \(n - 2 = 8\). Finally, the standard error \(s_{e}\) is computed as:
  • \( s_{e} = \sqrt{\frac{SSR}{\text{degrees of freedom}}} = \sqrt{\frac{1084.40}{8}} \approx 11.67 \)
The standard error \(s_{e}\) quantifies the typical distance that observed responses deviate from the regression line, providing insight into the model’s predictive precision.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is the following statement correct? Explain why or why not. A correlation coefficient of 0 implies that no relationship exists between the two variables under study.

According to the article "First-Year Academic Success: A Prediction Combining Cognitive and Psychosocial Variables for Caucasian and African American Students" \((\) Journal of College Student Development \([1999]: 599-\) 605), there is a mild correlation between high school GPA \((x)\) and first-year college GPA \((y)\). The data can be summarized as follows: $$ \begin{array}{clc} n=2600 & \sum x=9620 & \sum y=7436 \\ \sum x y=27,918 & \sum x^{2}=36,168 & \sum y^{2}=23,145 \end{array} $$ An alternative formula for computing the correlation coefficient that is based on raw data and is algebraically equivalent to the one given in the text is $$ r=\frac{\sum x y-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)\left(\sum y\right)}{n}}{\sqrt{\sum x^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)^{2}}{n}} \sqrt{\sum y^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum y\right)^{2}}{n}}} $$ Use this formula to compute the value of the correlation coefficient, and interpret this value.

Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) are used to assess the fit of a line. a. Is it possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set? Explain. (A picture might be helpful.) b. Is it possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small? Explain. (Again, a picture might be helpful.) c. Explain why it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{e}\) small if the relationship between two variables \(x\) and \(y\) is to be described using a straight line.

Representative data on \(x=\) carbonation depth (in millimeters) and \(y=\) strength (in megapascals) for a sample of concrete core specimens taken from a particular building were read from a plot in the article "The Carbonation of Concrete Structures in the Tropical Environment of Singapore" (Magazine of Concrete Research \([1996]: 293-300\) ): \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Depth, } x & 8.0 & 20.0 & 20.0 & 30.0 & 35.0 \\\ \text { Strength, } y & 22.8 & 17.1 & 21.1 & 16.1 & 13.4 \\ \text { Depth, } x & 40.0 & 50.0 & 55.0 & 65.0 & \\ \text { Strength, } y & 12.4 & 11.4 & 9.7 & 6.8 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a scatterplot. Does the relationship between carbonation depth and strength appear to be linear? b. Find the equation of the least-squares line. c. What would you predict for strength when carbonation depth is \(25 \mathrm{~mm}\) ? d. Explain why it would not be reasonable to use the least-squares line to predict strength when carbonation depth is \(100 \mathrm{~mm}\).

Draw two scatterplots, one for which \(r=1\) and a second for which \(r=-1\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.