/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 Swedish researchers concluded th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Problem 43

Swedish researchers concluded that viewing and discussing art soothes the soul and helps relieve medical conditions such as high blood pressure and constipation (AFP International News Agency, October 14,2005 ). This conclusion was based on a study in which 20 elderly women gathered once a week to discuss different works of art. The study also included a control group of 20 elderly women who met once a week to discuss their hobbies and interests. At the end of 4 months, the art discussion group was found to have a more positive attitude, to have lower blood pressure, and to use fewer laxatives than the control group. a. Why would it be important to determine if the researchers assigned the women participating in the study at random to one of the two groups? b. Explain why you think that the researchers included a control group in this study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Random assignment ensures the initial equivalence of groups, preventing bias and allowing for a valid comparison between groups. Hence, any observed differences can be attributed to the different treatments (art or hobby discussion) rather than pre-existing differences. Researchers included a control group to isolate the effects of the 鈥榯reatment鈥�, in this case, discussions about art. This allows for a comparison between groups to evaluate the influence of the 'treatment'.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the importance of random assignment

Random assignment in research minimizes the effects of confounding variables and bias, making sure the groups are equivalent at the beginning of the study. This promotes the validity of the conclusion, as any difference between the groups can be attributed to the treatment (in this case, the art discussion), rather than any pre-existing differences between individuals or groups.
02

Explain the inclusion of the control group

A control group in a study is essential to isolate the effect of the treatment. By including a control group that does not receive the treatment (in this case, the art discussion), any changes observed in the art group can be interpreted as the effect of the treatment, removing the impact of possible external factors. The control group in this study (those who discussed hobbies) serves to determine the normal outcome of not having the 'treatment', hence providing a base for comparison.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Based on observing more than 400 drivers in the Atlanta area, two investigators at Georgia State University concluded that people exiting parking spaces did so more slowly when a driver in another car was waiting for the space than when no one was waiting ("Territorial Defense in Parking Lots: Retaliation Against Waiting Drivers," Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1997]: \(821-834\) ). Describe how you might design an experiment to determine whether this phenomenon is true for your city. What is the response variable? What are some extraneous factors and how does your design control for them?

The article "Tots' TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 5, 2004) describes a study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics. In this study, researchers looked at records of 2500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. They found that \(10 \%\) of these children had attention disorders at age 7 and that hours of television watched at age 1 and age 3 was associated with an increased risk of having an attention disorder at age 7 . a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Give an example of a potentially confounding variable that would make it unwise to draw the conclusion that hours of television watched at a young age is the cause of the increased risk of attention disorder.

Of the 6500 students enrolled at a community college, 3000 are part time and the other 3500 are full time. The college can provide a list of students that is sorted so that all full-time students are listed first, followed by the part-time students. a. Select a stratified random sample that uses full-time and part-time students as the two strata and that includes 10 students from each stratum. Describe the procedure you used to select the sample, and identify the students included in your sample by placement on the sorted list. b. Does every student at this community college have the same chance of being selected for inclusion in the sample? Explain.

The Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London found that dealing with "infomania" has a temporary, but significant derogatory effect on IQ. (Discover, November 2005). In this experiment, researchers divided volunteers into two groups. Each subject took an IQ test. One group had to check email and respond to instant messages while taking the test while the second group took the test without any distraction. The distracted group had an average score that was 10 points lower than the average for the control group. Explain why it is important that the researchers created the two experimental groups in this study by using random assignment.

You have been asked to determine on what types of grasslands two species of birds, northern harriers and short-eared owls, build nests. The types of grasslands to be used include undisturbed native grasses, managed native grasses, undisturbed nonnative grasses, and managed nonnative grasses. You are allowed a plot of land \(500 \mathrm{~m}\) square to study. Explain how you would determine where to plant the four types of grasses. What role would randomization play in this determination? Identify any confounding variables. Would this study be considered an observational study or an experiment? (Based on the article "Response of Northern Harriers and Short-Eared Owls to Grassland Management in Illinois," Journal of Wildlife Management \([1999]: 517-523 .)\)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.