/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 An article titled "Guard Your Ki... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article titled "Guard Your Kids Against Allergies: Get Them a Pet" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August 28 , 2002) described a study that led researchers to conclude that "babies raised with two or more animals were about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six." a. Do you think this study was an observational study or an experiment? Explain. b. Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) This study is an observational study because the researchers did not manipulate any variables but only observed the occurrence of allergies in children raised with pets. \ b) A potential confounding variable could be the overall cleanliness and hygiene of the household, or a genetic predisposition to allergies. It's unreasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the sole cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Type of Study

To determine the type of study conducted, consider whether the researchers manipulated any variable or only observed them. It is said that 'babies raised with two or more animals were about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six', this suggests that the researchers only observed the occurrence of allergies in children raised with pets, without actually manipulating this variable (e.g., assigning specific pets to specific households). Therefore, this study is an observational study.
02

Identify a Potential Confounding Variable

To identify a potential confounding variable that could affect the conclusion of the study, consider factors other than 'being raised with two or more animals' that could influence the allergy rate in children. One potential variable could be the overall cleanliness and hygiene of the household. For example, households with pets might enforce stricter cleaning routines which reduce exposure to allergens, leading to a lower rate of allergies. Also, a genetic predisposition to allergies can also be a confounding variable. Therefore, it's unreasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the sole cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confounding Variable
When examining the link between raising children with pets and the prevalence of allergies, it's essential to consider the role of a confounding variable. A confounding variable is an external factor that can influence the observed outcome and mislead researchers to infer a false causal relationship. In the context of the study mentioned, where children raised alongside pets seemingly had a reduced risk of allergies, one major confounding variable could be household income level. Families with higher income might be more likely to own multiple pets and also have better access to healthcare and healthy living environments that could contribute to a lower allergy rate independent of pet ownership.

Another potential confounding variable is parental allergies. If parents have fewer allergies, they may be more inclined to own pets, and their children, due to genetic factors, might also tend to have fewer allergies. This genetic predisposition could skew the correlation, misattributing the allergy prevention to the presence of pets rather than the family's allergy history. Identifying and controlling for such variables is critical in studies to avoid incorrect conclusions.
Causal Relationship
Understanding the nature of a causal relationship is central to interpreting the results of studies like the one described. A causal relationship implies that one event is the result of, or caused by, another—like asserting that exposure to pets directly reduces the likelihood of developing allergies. However, in observational studies, where researchers observe subjects in their natural environment without manipulation, distinguishing causation from mere correlation is challenging.

For example, mere observation cannot rule out the possibility that children who naturally have a robust immune system both tend to have fewer allergies and are more likely to be in environments with pets. To establish a firm causal link, researchers might conduct a randomized controlled trial, where the presence of pets is an assigned variable, not just an observed condition. Until such rigorous experimentation is carried out, any assertion of a causal relationship between pet exposure and allergy prevention remains speculative.
Childhood Allergy Prevention
The topic of childhood allergy prevention is complex and multifaceted, involving environmental, genetic, and lifestyle factors. The hypothesis that exposure to pets might contribute to allergy prevention, known as the 'hygiene hypothesis,' suggests that early exposure to certain microbes helps develop the immune system, reducing the risk of allergies. Nonetheless, this hypothesis is one of many and must be considered within a broader context.

For instance, early introduction to a variety of foods, vitamin D levels, and exposure to farm environments have also been associated with allergy prevention. It is critical for parents and caregivers to be aware that no single factor guarantees allergy prevention and that a combination of good hygiene, balanced diet, and, possibly, pet exposure could play a role. Consulting with pediatricians and allergy specialists is advised for individualized recommendations tailored to each child's health profile and family history.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006 ) reports the results of an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lay down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

Does alcohol consumption cause increased cravings for cigarettes? Research at Purdue University suggests this is so (see CNN.com web site article "Researchers Find Link Between Cigarette Cravings and Alcohol," dated June 13,1997 ). In an experiment, 60 heavy smokers and moderate drinkers were divided into two groups. One group drank vodka tonics and the other group drank virgin tonics (tonic water alone), but all subjects were told they were drinking vodka tonics. The researchers then measured the level of nicotine cravings (by monitoring heart rate, skin conductance, etc.). Those who had consumed the vodka tonics had \(35 \%\) more cravings than those who did not. Assuming that the assignment of subjects to the treatment (vodka) and control groups was made at random, do you think there are any confounding factors that would make conclusions based on this experiment questionable?

Based on a survey of 4113 U.S. adults, researchers at Stanford University concluded that Internet use leads to increased social isolation. The survey was conducted by an Internet-based polling company that selected its samples from a pool of 35,000 potential respondents, all of whom had been given free Internet access and WebTV hardware

A novel alternative medical treatment for heart attacks seeds the damaged heart muscle with cells from the patient's thigh muscle ("Doctors Mend Damaged Hearts with Cells from Muscles"' San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 18,2002 ). Doctor Dib from the Arizona Heart Institute evaluated the approach on 16 patients with severe heart failure. The article states that "ordinarily, the heart pushes out more than half its blood with each beat. Dib's patients had such severe heart failure that their hearts pumped just 23 percent. After bypass surgery and cell injections, this improved to 36 percent, although it was impossible to say how much, if any, of the new strength resulted from the extra cells." a. Explain why it is not reasonable to generalize to the population of all heart attack victims based on the data from these 16 patients. b. Explain why it is not possible to say whether any of the observed improvement was due to the cell injections, based on the results of this study. c. Describe a design for an experiment that would allow researchers to determine whether bypass surgery plus cell injections was more effective than bypass surgery alone.

The Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London found that dealing with "infomania" has a temporary, but significant derogatory effect on IQ. (Discover, November 2005). In this experiment, researchers divided volunteers into two groups. Each subject took an IQ test. One group had to check email and respond to instant messages while taking the test while the second group took the test without any distraction. The distracted group had an average score that was 10 points lower than the average for the control group. Explain why it is important that the researchers created the two experimental groups in this study by using random assignment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.