/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 The article "Gene's Role in Canc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Gene's Role in Cancer May Be Overstated" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August 21,2002 ) states that "early studies that evaluated breast cancer risk among gene mutation carriers selected women in families where sisters, mothers, and grandmothers all had breast cancer. This created a statistical bias that skewed risk estimates for women in the general population." Is the bias described here selection bias, measurement bias, or nonresponse bias? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The bias described is selection bias. This is due to the fact that the early studies selected women in families where sisters, mothers, and grandmothers all had breast cancer. This selection process did not provide a fitting representation of the entire population but instead focused on a specific group, which led to skewed risk estimates for women in the general population.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Bias

Firstly, here's a description of a situation where women were selected from families where all members had breast cancer, in order to evaluate breast cancer risk among gene mutation carriers. The key word here is 'selected.' If the selection method excludes other women without a family history of breast cancer, then those handling the samples have introduced bias into this study. The bias is skewed so that the risk estimates are only valid for a certain section of the population, not the general population. This selection of a specific, non-representative group for the study makes it evident that this is a case of selection bias.
02

Understanding Why

Why is it a selection bias? It's because the sample used in the earlier studies didn't represent the general population accurately. This evasion of a broad and fair representation of the population, instead focusing on a narrow and selective group, has evidently introduced a bias in the statistical analysis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Selection Bias
Selection bias occurs in statistical analysis when the sample taken for a study is not representative of the broader population. This can distort the validity of the findings, leading to inaccurate conclusions.

In the case of breast cancer risk among gene mutation carriers, researchers initially selected only women with a strong family history of breast cancer. This approach excludes a large portion of the population, such as women with gene mutations but without a family history of breast cancer. Consequently, the risk estimates derived would be significantly higher than the actual risk for the general population, as these estimates only apply to a subgroup with a higher predisposition.

To reduce selection bias, it's crucial to use random selection procedures, ensuring every individual in the target population has an equal chance of being included in the sample. This method provides a true reflection of the population and leads to more reliable and generalizable results.
Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Assessment
Understanding the risk factors for breast cancer is a complex task that requires taking multiple variables into account, including genetic predispositions, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Gene mutation carriers may have a higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to the general population; however, the risk is not equal among all carriers.

For example, mutations in genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 significantly increase the risk, but how much risk can vary based on family history and other genetic factors that may not be as well understood.

Breast cancer risk assessments aim to provide individuals with information on their likelihood of developing the disease, which can lead to informed decisions regarding prevention and early detection strategies. It's essential to ensure these assessments are based on data accurately reflecting the diverse experiences and genetic backgrounds found within the broader population.
The Role of Gene Mutation Carriers in Understanding Cancer
Gene mutation carriers are individuals who have inherited genetic alterations that may elevate their risk of developing certain cancers. These mutations can be passed down through families, increasing the likelihood of related cancers across generations.

When studies focus exclusively on such families, they inadvertently emphasize the genetic component's role in cancer development. However, given the variety of factors contributing to cancer risk, examining a more heterogeneous population can provide a fuller understanding.

For precise risk estimation, it's necessary to include both carriers with and without a family history of cancer in research studies. This inclusion offers a balanced perspective on how gene mutations influence cancer risk in the general population, rather than skewing the data towards those with the highest predisposition.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto compared babies born to mothers with diabetes to babies born to mothers without diabetes ("Conditioning and Hyperanalgesia in Newborns Exposed to Repeated Heel Lances" "Journal of the American Medical Association \([2002]: 857-861) .\) Babies born to mothers with diabetes have their heels pricked numerous times during the first 36 hours of life in order to obtain blood samples to monitor blood sugar level. The researchers noted that the babies born to diabetic mothers were more likely to grimace or cry when having blood drawn than the babies born to mothers without diabetes. This led the researchers to conclude that babies who experience pain early in life become highly sensitive to pain. Comment on the appropriateness of this conclusion.

In national surveys, parents consistently point to school safety as an important concern. One source of violence in junior high schools is fighting ("Self-Reported Characterization of Seventh-Grade Student Fights"" Journal of Adolescent Health [1998]: 103-109). To construct a knowledge base about student fights, a school administrator wants to give two surveys to students after fights are broken up. One of the surveys is to be given to the participants, and the other is to be given to students who witnessed the fight. The type of information desired includes (1) the cause of the fight, (2) whether or not the fight was a continuation of a previous fight, (3) whether drugs or alcohol was a factor, (4) whether or not the fight was gang related, and (5) the role of bystanders. a. Write a set of questions that could be used in the two surveys. Each question should include a set of possible responses. For each question, indicate whether it would be used on both surveys or just on one of the two. b. How might the tendency toward positive selfpresentation affect the responses of the fighter to the survey questions you wrote for Part (a)? c. How might the tendency toward positive selfpresentation affect the responses of a bystander to the survey questions you wrote for Part (a)?

c. One problem with the pet-related questions is the reliance on memory. That is, parents may not actually remember when they got their pets. How might you check the parents' memories about these pets?

An article in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (September 7,1999 ) described an experiment designed to investigate the effect of creatine supplements on the development of muscle fibers. The article states that the researchers "looked at 19 men, all about 25 years of age and similar in weight, lean body mass, and capacity to lift weights. Ten were given creatine \(-25\) grams a day for the first week, followed by 5 grams a day for the rest of the study. The rest were given a fake preparation. No one was told what he was getting. All the men worked out under the guidance of the same trainer. The response variable measured was gain in fat-free mass (in percent)." a. What extraneous variables are identified in the given statement, and what strategy did the researchers use to deal with them? b. Do you think it was important that the men participating in the experiment were not told whether they were receiving creatine or the placebo? Explain. c. This experiment was not conducted in a double-blind manner. Do you think it would have been a good idea to make this a double-blind experiment? Explain.

A 1993 study showed that college students temporarily gained up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does randomization play in your design?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.