Chapter 5: Problem 4
Show that every polynomial of odd degree with real coefficients has at least one real root.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 5: Problem 4
Show that every polynomial of odd degree with real coefficients has at least one real root.
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Let \(A \subseteq \mathbb{R}\) and suppose that \(f: A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) has the following property: for each \(\varepsilon>0\) there exists a function \(g_{\varepsilon}: A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) such that \(g_{\varepsilon}\) is uniformly continuous on \(A\) and \(\left|f(x)-g_{\varepsilon}(x)\right|<\varepsilon\) for all \(x \in A .\) Prove that \(f\) is uniformly continuous on \(A\).
Let \(\delta\) be a gauge on \(I:=[a, b]\) and suppose that \(I\) does not have a \(\delta\) -fine partition. (a) Let \(c:=\frac{1}{2}(a+b)\). Show that at least one of the intervals \([a, c]\) and \([c, b]\) does not have a \(\delta\) - fine partition. (b) Construct a nested sequence \(\left(I_{n}\right)\) of subintervals with the length of \(I_{n}\) equal to \((b-a) / 2^{n}\) such that \(I_{n}\) does not have a \(\delta\) -fine partition. (c) Let \(\xi \in \cap_{n=1}^{\infty} I_{n}\) and let \(p \in \mathbb{N}\) be such that \((b-a) / 2^{p}<\delta(\xi)\). Show that \(I_{p} \subseteq[\xi-\delta(\xi)\), \(\xi+\delta(\xi)]\), so the pair \(\left(I_{p}, \xi\right)\) is a \(\delta\) -fine partition of \(I_{p}\).
Let \(g\) be defined on \(\mathbb{R}\) by \(g(1):=0\), and \(g(x):=2\) if \(x \neq 1\), and let \(f(x):=x+1\) for all \(x \in \mathbb{R}\). Show that \(\lim g \circ f \neq(g \circ f)(0)\). Why doesn't this contradict Theorem 5.2.6?
Prove that if \(f\) and \(g\) are each uniformly continuous on \(\mathbb{R}\), then the composite function \(f \circ g\) is uniformly continuous on \(\mathbb{R}\).
Let \(I:=[a, b]\) and let \(f: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be a (not necessarily continuous) function with the property that for every \(x \in I\), the function \(f\) is bounded on a neighborhood \(V_{\delta_{\lambda}}(x)\) of \(x\) (in the sense of Definition 4.2.1). Prove that \(f\) is bounded on \(I\).
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.