/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 Give the rejection region for a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give the rejection region for a chi-square test of independence if the contingency table involves \(r\) rows and \(c\) columns. $$r=3, c=5, \alpha=.01$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Identify the rejection region for a chi-square test of independence using a significance level of 0.01 and a contingency table with 3 rows and 5 columns. Answer: The rejection region for this chi-square test of independence is χ² > 20.09.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the degrees of freedom

To calculate the degrees of freedom, we use the formula \(df = (r-1)(c-1)\), where \(r\) is the number of rows and \(c\) is the number of columns in the contingency table. Plugging in the given values, we get: $$df = (3-1)(5-1) = 2\times4 = 8$$
02

Find the critical value

Using a chi-square distribution table, we find the critical value corresponding to our significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\) and \(df=8\). The critical value is approximately 20.09.
03

Determine the rejection region

To find the rejection region, we need to identify all values of the chi-square statistic that would lead to rejecting the null hypothesis. In this case, the rejection region is all values greater than the critical value. Therefore, the rejection region for this chi-square test of independence is: $$\text{Rejection Region: }\chi^2 > 20.09$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Degrees of Freedom
In statistics, especially when conducting a chi-square test of independence, the term 'degrees of freedom' is a pivotal concept. It represents the number of values in a calculation that can vary without violating any given constraints. For a chi-square test applied to a contingency table, the degrees of freedom (often abbreviated as df) are calculated using the formula:
\[ df = (r-1)(c-1) \]
where \( r \) represents the number of rows and \( c \) represents the number of columns in the contingency table. Essentially, this formula accounts for the number of independent categories that contribute to the calculation of the chi-square statistic. To put it simply, if you have a 3x5 table, there are 3 possible outcomes for each of 5 variables, but once you know the outcomes for 2 of the rows and 4 of the columns, the last row and column are determined. Thus, for our 3x5 table example, the degrees of freedom would be \( (3-1)(5-1) = 2 \times 4 = 8 \). Understanding degrees of freedom is crucial, as it affects the critical value of the test and therefore affects the test's conclusion.
Contingency Table
A contingency table, also known as a cross tabulation or crosstab, is a type of table in a matrix format that displays the frequency distribution of the variables. They are extensively used in statistics to organize data and show the relationship between two categorical variables. The rows usually represent one variable, and the columns represent another. Each cell in the table shows the count of occurrences for the respective combination of categories. For instance, if we are assessing the relationship between gender (male/female) and a preference for a type of book (fiction/non-fiction), a 2x2 table would display the count of males and females who prefer fiction or non-fiction books. Contingency tables are fundamental to chi-square tests because they provide the observed frequencies that are compared against expected frequencies under the null hypothesis of independence between the variables.
Critical Value
The 'critical value' in a statistical test is a point (or points) on the scale of the test statistic beyond which we reject the null hypothesis, assuming it is true. In the context of a chi-square test of independence, the critical value is determined based on the degrees of freedom and the level of significance, \( \(alpha \)). The significance level is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true, and is denoted by \( \alpha \) (commonly set to 0.05, 0.01, etc.). To find the critical value, one would typically refer to a chi-square distribution table, which outlines critical values for different degrees of freedom at various significance levels. For our exercise with 8 degrees of freedom and an \( \alpha \) of 0.01, the critical value is approximately 20.09. This critical value serves as the threshold for deciding whether the observed data significantly deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis.
Rejection Region
The 'rejection region' for a statistical hypothesis test is the range of values for the test statistic for which the null hypothesis is rejected. This region is determined by the significance level of the test and the critical value. In a chi-square test of independence, the rejection region consists of all chi-square statistic values that are greater than the critical value. If the calculated chi-square statistic from the test exceeds this critical value, the result is statistically significant, and the null hypothesis (of no association between the categorical variables) is rejected. For example, with a critical value of 20.09 and a significance level of 0.01, the rejection region is any chi-square value larger than 20.09. It is essential to understand that the rejection region corresponds to the 'tail' of the chi-square distribution, where values falling into this region indicate a low probability of observing such extreme statistics given that the null hypothesis is true.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A department store manager claims that her store has twice as many customers on Fridays and Saturdays than on any other day of the week (the store is closed on Sundays). That is, the probability that a customer visits the store Friday is \(2 / 8\), the probability that a customer visits the store Saturday is \(2 / 8\), while the probability that a customer visits the store on each of the remaining weekdays is \(1 / 8\). During an average week, the following numbers of customers visited the store: $$ \begin{array}{lr} \hline \text { Day } & \text { Number of Customers } \\ \hline \text { Monday } & 95 \\ \text { Tuesday } & 110 \\ \text { Wednesday } & 125 \\ \text { Thursday } & 75 \\ \text { Friday } & 181 \\ \text { Saturday } & 214 \end{array} $$ Can the manager's claim be refuted at the \(\alpha=.05\) level of significance?

Researchers from Germany have concluded that the risk of a heart attack for a working person may be as much as \(50 \%\) greater on Monday than on any other day. \({ }^{1}\) In an attempt to verify their claim, 200 working people who had recently had heart attacks were surveyed and the day on which their heart attacks occurred was recorded: $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Day } & \text { Observed Count } \\ \hline \text { Sunday } & 24 \\ \text { Monday } & 36 \\ \text { Tuesday } & 27 \\ \text { Wednesday } & 26 \\ \text { Thursday } & 32 \\ \text { Friday } & 26 \\ \text { Saturday } & 29 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a difference in the incidence of heart attacks depending on the day of the week? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

Conduct the appropriate test of specified probabilities using the information given. Write the null and alternative hypotheses, give the rejection region with \(\alpha=.05\) and calculate the test statistic. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test. Conduct the test and state your conclusions. The specified probabilities are \(p_{1}=.4, p_{2}=.3\), \(p_{3}=.3\) and the category counts are shown in the table: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} \text { Category } & 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline \text { Observed Count } & 130 & 98 & 72 \end{array} $$

Accident data were analyzed to determine the numbers of fatal accidents for automo- biles of three sizes. The data for 346 accidents are as follows: Do the data indicate that the frequency of fatal accidents is dependent on the size of automobiles? Test using a \(5 \%\) significance level.

Manganese nodules are mineral-rich concoctions found abundantly on the deep- sea floor. \({ }^{10}\) A research report relates the magnetic age of the earth's crust to the "probability of finding manganese nodules," giving the number of samples of the earth's core and the percentage of those that contain manganese nodules for each of a set of magnetic-crust ages. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the probability of finding manganese nodules in the deepsea earth's crust is dependent on the magnetic- age classification? $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Age } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Samples } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Percentage with } \\ \text { Nodules } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Miocene-recent } & 389 & 5.9 \\ \text { Oligocene } & 140 & 17.9 \\ \text { Eocene } & 214 & 16.4 \\ \text { Paleocene } & 84 & 21.4 \\ \text { Late Cretaceous } & 247 & 21.1 \\ \text { Early and Middle Cretaceous } & 1120 & 14.2 \\ \text { Jurassic } & 99 & 11.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.