/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Use the information in Exercises... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the information in Exercises \(7-8 .\) Calculate the observed value of the \(t\) statistic for testing the difference between the two population means using paired data. Approximate the \(p\) -value for the test and use it to state your conclusions. $$\bar{d}=5.7, s_{d}^{2}=256, n=18, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{d}>0$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The observed value of the t-statistic is approximately 1.783, and with a p-value of approximately 0.045, which is less than the significance level (typically \(\alpha=0.05\)), we reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{d} = 0\) in favor of the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: \mu_{d}>0\). There is sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a significant difference between the two population means using paired data at a 5% significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the observed t-statistic value

We are given the following information: - The sample mean difference \(\bar{d}=5.7\) - The sample variance of the differences \(s_{d}^{2}=256\) - Sample size \(n=18\) - The alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: \mu_{d}>0\) To calculate the observed value of the t-statistic, we will use the following formula: $$t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}$$ In our case, \(\mu_d = 0\) due to the null hypothesis \(H_0: \mu_d = 0\). First, let's find the standard deviation of the differences, \(s_d\), which is the square root of the variance: $$s_d = \sqrt{s_{d}^2} = \sqrt{256} = 16$$ Now, we can calculate the t-statistic: $$t = \frac{5.7 - 0}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{18}}} = \frac{5.7}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{18}}} \approx 1.783$$ The observed value of the t-statistic is approximately 1.783.
02

Approximate the p-value and state conclusions

To approximate the p-value, we will use the t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to \(n-1 = 18-1 = 17\). To do this, we will refer to a t-distribution table or use statistical software. We find the area to the right of the t-statistic because our alternative hypothesis is \(H_{a}: \mu_{d}>0\). By looking at the t-distribution table or using software, we find that the p-value is approximately 0.045. Since the p-value is 0.045, which is less than the significance level (typically \(\alpha=0.05\)), we reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{d} = 0\) in favor of the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: \mu_{d}>0\). In conclusion, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a significant difference between the two population means using paired data at a 5% significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observed t-Statistic Value
Understanding the observed t-statistic value is a critical step in hypothesis testing, particularly when dealing with paired samples. Let's simplify the concept using the information given in the exercise. Here, we have a sample of paired data where the average difference between the pairs is 5.7, and the variance of these differences is 256. There are 18 pairs in total. To compare the means of this paired data, we calculate the observed t-statistic value.

The formula we use is: \[\begin{equation}t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}\end{equation}\]
where \(\bar{d}\) is the mean difference in our sample, \(s_d\) is the standard deviation of the differences, \(n\) is the number of pairs, and \(\mu_d\) is the hypothesized mean difference which is zero for the null hypothesis. After computing the standard deviation as the square root of the variance (16 in our case), we find the t-statistic to be approximately 1.783. This value is the first indicator in determining whether there is a statistically significant difference in means between the paired samples.
P-Value Approximation
Once we have our observed t-statistic value, the next step is to figure out the p-value approximation. The p-value tells us about the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. It is a critical component of hypothesis testing as it helps us make a decision about our hypotheses.

To approximate the p-value for the paired t-test, we use a t-distribution with degrees of freedom (df) which is generally the sample size minus one. In this example, the df is 17 (since \(n = 18\)). Using statistical tables or software, we find that our t-statistic of 1.783 corresponds to a p-value of approximately 0.045. This means that if there was really no difference between the mean differences of our population pairs, there would be only a 4.5% chance of observing a sample mean difference of 5.7 or more. Since this p-value is less than the commonly used significance level of 0.05, we would conclude that there is statistically significant evidence to suggest a greater mean difference than zero.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental process used in statistics to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition holds for the entire population. In the context of the paired t-test, the focus is on testing the mean difference between paired observations.

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) often posits no effect or no difference, while the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) suggests the presence of an effect or a difference. In this example, the null hypothesis states there is no difference in the mean differences \((\mu_d = 0)\), while the alternative hypothesis asserts that the mean difference is greater than zero \((\mu_d > 0)\). After calculating the observed t-statistic and the p-value, we compare the p-value against a predetermined significance level, typically \(\alpha = 0.05\). If the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative, thus concluding that the data provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

In our paired data example, with a p-value of 0.045 being smaller than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the two population means are indeed different.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the tabled value of \(t\left(t_{a}\right)\) corresponding to a left-tail area a and degrees of freedom given. $$ a=.005, d f=23 $$

A pollution control inspector suspected that a river community was releasing amounts of semitreated sewage into a river. To check his theory, he drew five randomly selected specimens of river water at a location above the town, and another five below. The dissolved oxygen readings (in parts per million) are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{l|lllll} \text { Above Town } & 4.8 & 5.2 & 5.0 & 4.9 & 5.1 \\ \hline \text { Below Town } & 5.0 & 4.7 & 4.9 & 4.8 & 4.9 \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean oxygen content below the town is less than the mean oxygen content above? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. Estimate the difference in the mean dissolved oxygen contents for locations above and below the town. Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval.

Calculate the number of degrees of freedom for \(s^{2}\), the pooled estimator of \(\sigma^{2}\). $$ n_{1}=16, \quad n_{2}=8 $$

Pollution Control The EPA limit on the allowable discharge of suspended solids into rivers and streams is 60 milligrams per liter \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L})\) per day. A study of water samples selected from the discharge at a phosphate mine shows that over a long period, the mean daily discharge of suspended solids is \(48 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L},\) but day-to-day discharge readings are variable. State inspectors measured the discharge rates of suspended solids for \(n=20\) days and found \(s^{2}=39(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L})^{2}\). Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\sigma^{2}\). Interpret your results.

Drug Potency To properly treat patients, drugs prescribed by physicians must have not only a mean potency value as specified on the drug's container, but also small variation in potency values. A drug manufacturer claims that his drug has a potency of \(5 \pm .1\) milligram per cubic centimeter \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc})\). A random sample of four containers gave potency readings equal to \(4.94,5.09,5.03,\) and \(4.90 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} .\) a. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean potency differs from \(5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} ?\) b. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the variation in potency differs from the error limits specified by the manufacturer? (HINT: It is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what is meant by limits on potency as specified by a manufacturer. Since he implies that the potency values will fall into the interval \(5 \pm .1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}\) with very high probability - the implication is almost always-let us assume that the range .2 or 4.9 to 5.1 represents \(6 \sigma,\) as suggested by the Empirical Rule.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.