/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 A random sample of \(n=35\) obse... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A random sample of \(n=35\) observations from a quantitative population produced a mean \(\bar{x}=2.4\) and a standard deviation \(s=.29 .\) Suppose your research objective is to show that the population mean \(\mu\) exceeds 2.3 a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. b. Locate the rejection region for the test using a \(5 \%\) significance level. c. Find the standard error of the mean. d. Before you conduct the test, use your intuition to decide whether the sample mean \(\bar{x}=2.4\) is likely or unlikely, assuming that \(\mu=2.3 .\) Now conduct the test. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that \(\mu>2.3 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yes, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population mean is greater than 2.3.

Step by step solution

01

a. Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis states the situation where there is no effect or no difference, while the alternative hypothesis claims that there is an effect or a difference. In this case, we want to determine if the population mean exceeds 2.3. Thus, Null hypothesis: \(\ H_0: \mu = 2.3\) (the population mean is equal to 2.3) Alternative hypothesis: \(\ H_1: \mu > 2.3 \) (the population mean is greater than 2.3)
02

b. Rejection Region

The rejection region is the set of sample statistics that leads us to reject the null hypothesis, based on the significance level. In this case, we are using a 5% significance level, so our critical value will be a z-score corresponding to the value that separates the 95% of the lower area and the 5% of the upper area (right-tail) of the z-distribution. According to z-tables, that z-score is approximately 1.645 (you can find this value using tables, calculators or statistical software). Since our alternative hypothesis states that the population mean is greater than 2.3, our rejection region will be all z-scores to the right of 1.645.
03

c. Standard Error of the Mean

The standard error of the mean (SEM) can be calculated as follows: SEM = \(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\) Plugging in the given values, we have: SEM = \(\frac{0.29}{\sqrt{35}} \approx 0.049\)
04

d. Testing the Hypothesis

Intuitively, we might think that since the sample mean is 2.4, which is greater than 2.3 the population mean might also be greater than 2.3. This is an intuition, but we need to test it statistically. To evaluate if the sample provides enough evidence to accept or reject the null hypothesis, we will use the test statistic (z-score) formula: \(z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\text{SEM}}\) Where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu_0\) is the value stated in the null hypothesis, and SEM is the standard error of the mean. Plugging in the given values, we get: \(z = \frac{2.4 - 2.3}{0.049} \approx 2.04\) Since our calculated z-score (2.04) is greater than the critical value (1.645), it lies in the rejection region. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population mean \(\mu\) is greater than 2.3.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \) represents a default state or the status quo that there is no effect or no notable difference in a given population parameter. The null hypothesis is what researchers aim to test against. It's important because it can be specifically tested and possibly rejected in favour of an alternative hypothesis. For example, if we want to test if a new teaching method is more effective than the standard, the null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in effectiveness between the two methods.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \( H_1 \) or sometimes \( H_a \), is a statement that suggests a possible effect or difference that contradicts the null hypothesis. In our textbook exercise, the alternative hypothesis suggests that the population mean exceeds 2.3. The role of hypothesis testing is to determine whether the observed data provides enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If researchers have sufficient evidence, they may reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative.
Rejection Region
The rejection region is the range of values which, if the test statistic (such as z-score) falls within, the null hypothesis will be rejected. It's determined based on the significance level of the test. A key element of understanding the rejection region is knowing it is tail-specific; it can be one-tailed (either left or right) or two-tailed (both sides) depending on the alternative hypothesis. With a 5% significance level for a right-tailed test, any z-score higher than the critical value (approximately 1.645) falls into the rejection region, casting doubt on the null hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true (Type I error). Common levels include 5%, 1%, and 0.1%. Lower significance levels mean we require stronger evidence before we reject \( H_0 \). The significance level is also related to the confidence level of the test, which is 100% minus the significance level. A 5% significance level corresponds to a 95% confidence level, implying that we can be 95% confident that our results are not due to random chance.
Standard Error
Standard error measures the dispersion of the sampling distribution of a statistic, most commonly of the mean. It's derived from the standard deviation of the sample and the sample size. The standard error indicates the accuracy with which a sample represents a population. In the given exercise, calculating the standard error gives insight into how much the sample mean of 2.4 might vary from the actual population mean. The formula \(\text{SEM} = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\) provides a key component for determining the z-score in hypothesis testing.
Z-Score
A z-score is a statistical metric that describes the position of a raw score in terms of how many standard deviations it is away from the mean. In hypothesis testing, the z-score serves as the test statistic for the z-test, which assesses whether there is a significant difference between sample observations and the null hypothesis. A high absolute value of a z-score (far from zero) suggests an unlikely result under the null hypothesis and may lead to its rejection. The calculation of the z-score integrates the sample mean, the null hypothesis mean, and the standard error, culminating in the decision-making process of the hypothesis test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sports and Achilles Tendon Injuries Some sports that involve a significant amount of running, jumping, or hopping put participants at risk for Achilles tendinopathy (AT), an inflammation and thickening of the Achilles tendon. A study in The American Journal of Sports Medicine looked at the diameter (in \(\mathrm{mm}\) ) of the affected tendons for patients who participated in these types of sports activities. Suppose that the Achilles tendon diameters in the general population have a mean of 5.97 millimeters (mm). When the diameters of the affected tendon were measured for a random sample of 31 patients, the average diameter was 9.80 with a standard deviation of \(1.95 \mathrm{~mm}\). Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the average diameter of the tendon for patients with AT is greater than \(5.97 \mathrm{~mm}\) ? Test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance.

Find the \(p\) -value for the following large-sample \(z\) tests: a. A right-tailed test with observed \(z=1.15\) b. A two-tailed test with observed \(z=-2.78\) c. A left-tailed test with observed \(z=-1.81\)

Independent random samples of 36 and 45 observations are drawn from two quantitative populations, 1 and \(2,\) respectively. The sample data summary is shown here: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Sample 1 } & \text { Sample 2 } \\\\\hline \text { Sample Size } & 36 & 45 \\\\\text { Sample Mean } & 1.24 & 1.31 \\\\\text { SampleVariance } & .0560 & .0540\end{array}$$ Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean for population 1 is smaller than the mean for population 2 ? Use one of the two methods of testing presented in this section, and explain your conclusions

Daily Wages The daily wages in a particular industry are normally distributed with a mean of \(\$ 94\) and a standard deviation of \(\$ 11.88\). Suppose a company in this industry employs 40 workers and pays them \(\$ 91.50\) per week on the average. Can these workers be viewed as a random sample from among all workers in the industry? a. What are the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested? b. Use the Large-Sample Test of a Population Mean applet to find the observed value of the test statistic. c. Use the Large-Sample Test of a Population Mean applet to find the \(p\) -value for this test. d. If you planned to conduct your test using \(\alpha=.01\), what would be your test conclusions? e. Was it necessary to know that the daily wages are normally distributed? Explain your answer.

Breaking Strengths of Cables A test of the breaking strengths of two different types of cables was conducted using samples of \(n_{1}=n_{2}=100\) pieces of each type of cable. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference between the mean breaking strengths of the two cables? Use \(\alpha=.05 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.