/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 Hotel Costs II Refer to Exercise... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Hotel Costs II Refer to Exercise \(9.25 .\) The table below shows the sample data collected to compare the average room rates at the Wyndham and Radisson hotel chains. $$\begin{array}{lcr} & \text { Wyndham } & \text { Radisson } \\\\\hline \text { Sample Average } & \$ 150 & \$ 145 \\\\\text { Sample Standard Deviation } & 16.5 & 10\end{array}$$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the average room rates for the Wyndham and the Radisson hotel chains? Use \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the average room rates for the two chains. Does this interval confirm your conclusions in part a?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain why or why not.

Step by step solution

01

State the hypothesis

Using the common notations \(\mu_1\) and \(\mu_2\), we can express the null hypothesis: there is no difference between the average room rates of the Westin and Doubletree hotels: $$H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0$$ The alternative hypothesis: there is a difference between the average room rates of the Westin and Doubletree hotels: $$H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0$$
02

Perform a two-sample t-test

To perform a two-sample t-test, we need the following formula: $$t = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}$$ Here: \(\bar{x}_1 = 165\) (Westin's sample average) \(\bar{x}_2 = 125\) (Doubletree's sample average) \(s_1 = 22.5\) (Westin's sample std. deviation) \(s_2 = 12.8\) (Doubletree's sample std. deviation) \(n_1, n_2\) (We don't have the values for sample sizes, so we will assume they are large enough for t-test.) Plug the values into the formula: $$t = \frac{(165-125) - (0)}{\sqrt{\frac{22.5^2}{n_1} + \frac{12.8^2}{n_2}}}$$
03

Calculate the t-score

From the formula above, $$t = \frac{40}{\sqrt{\frac{22.5^2}{n_1} + \frac{12.8^2}{n_2}}}$$ Without the values of \(n_1\) and \(n_2\), we cannot calculate the t-score.
04

Find the p-value and draw conclusions

Since we can't calculate the t-score, we cannot find the p-value and draw conclusions. However, if we had \(n_1\) and \(n_2\), we would compare the calculated p-value to the given significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)) and reject or fail to reject null hypothesis.
05

Construct a 95% confidence interval

A 95% confidence interval for the difference in average room rates between the two hotel chains can be found using the following formula: $$\left[\ (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - t_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}},\ (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) + t_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\ \right]$$ Since we don't have the values for sample sizes, we cannot calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in average room rates between the two hotel chains. However, if we had \(n_1\) and \(n_2\), we would use this formula to find the confidence interval and see if it confirms our conclusions in part a. In conclusion, without the values for the sample sizes (\(n_1\) and \(n_2\)), we are unable to perform the required tests and calculate the confidence interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions about population parameters. It involves making an assumption, called the null hypothesis \( H_0 \), and then determining whether the data provides enough evidence to reject this assumption in favor of an alternative hypothesis \( H_a \).

In our exercise, the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \) suggests that there is no difference in average room rates between the Wyndham and Radisson hotels. If this hypothesis is rejected, it implies that a significant difference does exist, as stipulated by the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \eq 0 \).

To test this hypothesis, a two-sample t-test is employed, which compares the sample means from two different populations. Based on the p-value obtained from the t-test and the chosen significance level \( \alpha \), which is often 0.05, we can either reject \( H_0 \) or fail to reject it. Rejecting \( H_0 \) suggests that the observed difference in sample means is not likely due to random chance. However, without sample sizes for our data, it's important to note that the t-test cannot be completed, and thus hypothesis testing cannot be performed.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we can be a certain percentage confident that the population parameter, such as the mean difference, falls. In the context of our exercise, a 95% confidence interval gives us a range that, according to the data, contains the true average difference between room rates 95% of the time.

To construct this interval for the difference in average room rates, we would typically use the formula given in the solution, incorporating the sample statistics and t-value associated with \( \alpha/2 \) for a two-tailed test. However, since the sample sizes \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) aren't available in the provided data, it's not possible to calculate this interval accurately.

Understanding the 95% Confidence Interval

If we were able to calculate the interval, and it did not contain 0, this would imply that the difference in room rates is statistically significant at the 5% significance level, which would likely lead us to reject the null hypothesis from our hypothesis testing. Therefore, the confidence interval can serve as a visual and numerical way to judge the hypothesis test's result.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion in a set of values. A low standard deviation indicates that the values tend to be close to the mean \( \mu \), while a high standard deviation indicates that the values are spread out over a wider range.

In hypothesis testing and specifically in a two-sample t-test, the sample standard deviations \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are used to estimate the variability within each group being compared. This information is crucial as it directly influences the test statistic calculation, which in turn affects the p-value and confidence interval construction.

Role of Standard Deviation in the t-Test

The Wyndham and Radisson hotel chains in our exercise have sample standard deviations of 16.5 and 10, respectively. These values express the amount of variability in the room rates around each sample mean. When comparing two means, the larger the standard deviations, the more overlap there might be between the two datasets, which could make it harder to detect a real difference between the populations' means. It's essential to note that we need sample sizes to pair with the standard deviations for a complete analysis – without them, our test outcome remains inconclusive.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Bass Fishing The pH factor is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of water. A reading of 7.0 is neutral; values in excess of 7.0 indicate alkalinity; those below 7.0 imply acidity. Loren Hill states that the best chance of catching bass occurs when the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the water is in the range 7.5 to \(7.9 .{ }^{17}\) Suppose you suspect that acid rain is lowering the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of your favorite fishing spot and you wish to determine whether the \(\mathrm{pH}\) is less than 7.5 a. State the alternative and null hypotheses that you would choose for a statistical test. b. Does the alternative hypothesis in part a imply a one- or a two-tailed test? Explain. c. Suppose that a random sample of 30 water specimens gave \(\mathrm{pH}\) readings with \(\bar{x}=7.3\) and \(s=.2\) Just glancing at the data, do you think that the difference \(\bar{x}-7.5=-.2\) is large enough to indicate that the mean \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the water samples is less than \(7.5 ?\) (Do not conduct the test.) d. Now conduct a statistical test of the hypotheses in part a and state your conclusions. Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) Compare your statistically based decision with your intuitive decision in part c.

Find the \(p\) -value for the following large-sample \(z\) tests: a. A right-tailed test with observed \(z=1.15\) b. A two-tailed test with observed \(z=-2.78\) c. A left-tailed test with observed \(z=-1.81\)

Independent random samples of 36 and 45 observations are drawn from two quantitative populations, 1 and \(2,\) respectively. The sample data summary is shown here: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Sample 1 } & \text { Sample 2 } \\\\\hline \text { Sample Size } & 36 & 45 \\\\\text { Sample Mean } & 1.24 & 1.31 \\\\\text { SampleVariance } & .0560 & .0540\end{array}$$ Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean for population 1 is smaller than the mean for population 2 ? Use one of the two methods of testing presented in this section, and explain your conclusions

Suppose you wish to detect a difference between \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) (either \(\mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) or \(\mu_{1}<\mu_{2}\) ) and, instead of running a two-tailed test using \(\alpha=.05,\) you use the following test procedure. You wait until you have collected the sample data and have calculated \(\bar{x}_{1}\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}\) If \(\bar{x}_{1}\) is larger than \(\bar{x}_{2},\) you choose the alternative hypothesis \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) and run a one-tailed test placing \(\alpha_{1}=.05\) in the upper tail of the \(z\) distribution. If, on the other hand, \(\bar{x}_{2}\) is larger than \(\bar{x}_{1},\) you reverse the procedure and run a one-tailed test, placing \(\alpha_{2}=.05\) in the lower tail of the \(z\) distribution. If you use this procedure and if \(\mu_{1}\) actually equals \(\mu_{2},\) what is the probability \(\alpha\) that you will conclude that \(\mu_{1}\) is not equal to \(\mu_{2}\) (i.e., what is the probability \(\alpha\) that you will incorrectly reject \(H_{0}\) when \(H_{0}\) is true)? This exercise demonstrates why statistical tests should be formulated prior to observing the data.

Biomass Exercise 7.63 reported that the biomass for tropical woodlands, thought to be about 35 kilograms per square meter \(\left(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right),\) may in fact be too high and that tropical biomass values vary regionally - from about 5 to \(55 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2} .20\) Suppose you measure the tropical biomass in 400 randomly selected square- meter plots and obtain \(\bar{x}=31.75\) and \(s=10.5 .\) Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that scientists are overestimating the mean biomass for tropical woodlands and that the mean is in fact lower than estimated? a. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested. b. Locate the rejection region for the test with \(\alpha=.01\). c. Conduct the test and state your conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.