/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 Give the rejection region for a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 15: Problem 45

Give the rejection region for a test to detect rank correlation if the number of pairs of ranks is 25 and you have these \(\alpha\) -values: a. \(\alpha=.05\) b. \(\alpha=.01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The rejection regions are as follows: a. For \(\alpha = 0.05\), the rejection region is when the absolute value of the test statistic (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient) is greater than 0.396: \(|r_s| > 0.396\) b. For \(\alpha = 0.01\), the rejection region is when the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than 0.519: \(|r_s| > 0.519\) These rejection regions apply to a two-tailed test, where we are looking for either a strong positive or strong negative correlation, and reject the null hypothesis if the correlation coefficient is too large, either positively or negatively, compared to the critical values.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the number of pairs of ranks and the corresponding degree of freedom

The problem states that the number of pairs of ranks is 25. The degree of freedom (df) can be calculated as the number of pairs minus 2. So, for our problem, we have: df = 25 - 2 = 23
02

Find the critical values for the given \(\alpha\)-values

We need to find the critical values for the given \(\alpha\)-values using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient table. Let's denote the critical values as \(r_{\alpha}\). a. For \(\alpha = 0.05\), the table gives us a critical value at the degree of freedom of 23: \(r_{0.05} = 0.396\) b. For \(\alpha = 0.01\), the table gives us a critical value at the degree of freedom of 23: \(r_{0.01} = 0.519\)
03

Determine the rejection region

The rejection region is the set of values for which we would reject the null hypothesis (that there is no correlation), and we find this by comparing the actual test statistic (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient) to the critical values. a. For \(\alpha = 0.05\), the rejection region is when the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than \(r_{0.05}\): \(|r_s| > 0.396\) b. For \(\alpha = 0.01\), the rejection region is when the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than \(r_{0.01}\): \(|r_s| > 0.519\) These rejection regions are for the two-tailed test, where we are looking for either a strong positive or strong negative correlation, and reject the null hypothesis if the correlation coefficient is too large, either positively or negatively, compared to the critical values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study reported in the American Journal of Public Health (Science News) - the first to follow blood lead levels in law abiding handgun hobbyists using indoor firing ranges-documents a significant risk of lead poisoning. \({ }^{3}\) Lead exposure measurements were made on 17 members of a law enforcement trainee class before, during, and after a 3 -month period of firearm instruction at a state-owned indoor firing range. No trainee had elevated blood lead levels before the training, but 15 of the 17 ended their training with blood lead levels deemed "elevated" by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). If the use of an indoor firing range causes no increase in blood lead levels, then \(p\), the probability that a person's blood lead level increases, is less than or equal to .5. If, however, use of the indoor firing range causes an increase in a person's blood lead levels, then \(p>.5\). Use the sign test to determine whether using an indoor firing range has the effect of increasing a person's blood lead level with \(\alpha=.05 .\) (HINT: The normal approximation to binomial probabilities is fairly accurate for \(n=17 .\) )

Clinical data concerning the effectiveness of two drugs in treating a particular disease were collected from ten hospitals. The numbers of patients treated with the drugs varied from one hospital to another. You want to know whether the data present sufficient evidence to indicate a higher recovery rate for one of the two drugs. a. Test using the sign test. Choose your rejection region so that \(\alpha\) is near \(.05 .\) b. Why might it be inappropriate to use the Student's \(t\) -test in analyzing the data?

The productivity of 35 students was observed and measured both before and after the installation of new lighting in their classroom. The productivity of 21 of the 35 students was observed to have improved, whereas the productivity of the others appeared to show no perceptible gain as a result of the new lighting. Use the normal approximation to the sign test to determine whether or not the new lighting was effective in increasing student productivity at the \(5 \%\) level of significance.

Suppose you wish to detect a difference in the locations of two population distributions based on a paired-difference experiment consisting of \(n=30\) pairs. a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. b. Give the test statistic. c. Give the rejection region for the test for \(\alpha=.05\). d. If \(T^{+}=249,\) what are your conclusions? [NOTE: \(T^{+}+T^{-}=n(n+1) / 2 .\)

In a study of the palatability of antibiotics in children, Dr. Doreen Matsui and colleagues used a voluntary sample of healthy children to assess their reactions to the taste of four antibiotics. \({ }^{4}\) The children's response was measured on a 10 -centimeter (cm) visual analog scale incorporating the use of faces, from sad (low score) to happy (high score). The minimum score was 0 and the maximum was \(10 .\) For the accompanying data (simulated from the results of Matsui's report), each of five children was asked to taste each of four antibiotics and rate them using the visual (faces) analog scale from 0 to \(10 \mathrm{~cm}\) a. What design is used in collecting these data? b. Using an appropriate statistical package for a two way classification, produce a normal probability plot of the residuals as well as a plot of residuals versus antibiotics. Do the usual analysis of variance assumptions appear to be satisfied? c. Use the appropriate nonparametric test to test for differences in the distributions of responses to the tastes of the four antibiotics. d. Comment on the results of the analysis of variance in part b compared with the nonparametric test in part \(\mathrm{c} .\)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.