Athletes and others suffering the same type of injury to the knee often
require anterior and posterior ligament reconstruction. In order to determine
the proper length of bone-patellar tendonbone grafts, experiments were done
using three imaging techniques to determine the required length of the grafts,
and these results were compared to the actual length required. A summary of
the results of a simple linear regression analysis for each of these three
methods is given in the following table. \({ }^{15}\)
$$
\begin{array}{llrcc}
\text { Imaging Technique } & \text {Coeffcient of Determination, } r^{2} &
\text { Intercept } & \text { Slope } & p \text { -value } \\
\hline \text { Radiographs } & 0.80 & -3.75 & 1.031 & <0.0001 \\
\text { Standard MRI } & 0.43 & 20.29 & 0.497 & 0.011 \\
\text { 3-dimensional MRI } & 0.65 & 1.80 & 0.977 & <0.0001
\end{array}
$$
a. What can you say about the significance of each of the three regression
analyses?
b. How would you rank the effectiveness of the three regression analyses? What
is the basis of your decision?
c. How do the values of \(r^{2}\) and the \(p\) -values compare in determining the
best predictor of actual graft lengths of ligament required?