/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 The analysis of variance \(F\) -... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The analysis of variance \(F\) -test in Exercise 11.17 (and data set EX 1117 ) determined that there was indeed a difference in the average cost of lumber for the four states. The following information from Exercise 11.17 is given in the table: $$ \begin{array}{ll|lr} \hline \text { Sample Means } & \bar{x}_{1}=242.2 & \text { MSE } & 41.25 \\ & \bar{x}_{2}=214.8 & \text { Error } d f: & 16 \\ & \bar{x}_{3}=231.6 & n_{i}: & 5 \\ & \bar{x}_{4}=248.6 & k: & 4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use Tukey's method for paired comparisons to determine which means differ significantly from the others at the \(\alpha=.01\) level.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The pairs of states with significant differences in the average cost of lumber at the α = 0.01 level are (state 1, state 2), (state 2, state 3), (state 2, state 4), and (state 3, state 4).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Critical Value for Tukey's Test

We have to find the critical value for Tukey's test using the Studentized range statistic table. We do so by looking for the parameters: α = 0.01, k (number of groups) = 4, and error degrees of freedom = 16. Checking a Studentized range statistic table, we find the critical value: 4.98
02

Calculate the Differences Between All Pairs of Sample Means

Find the differences between all possible pairs of sample means: 1. \(|\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}| = |242.2 - 214.8| = 27.4\) 2. \(|\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{3}| = |242.2 - 231.6| = 10.6\) 3. \(|\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{4}| = |242.2 - 248.6| = 6.4\) 4. \(|\bar{x}_{2} - \bar{x}_{3}| = |214.8 - 231.6| = 16.8\) 5. \(|\bar{x}_{2} - \bar{x}_{4}| = |214.8 - 248.6| = 33.8\) 6. \(|\bar{x}_{3} - \bar{x}_{4}| = |231.6 - 248.6| = 17.0\)
03

Compare the Absolute Differences to the Critical Value

Now we must compare the absolute differences to the critical value we found earlier (4.98). To do this, we should use the mean square error (MSE = 41.25), the number of observations per group (nᵢ = 5), and the critical value (4.98) to calculate the least significant difference (LSD) between the means: LSD = Critical Value × \(\sqrt{\frac{MSE}{n_i}}\) = 4.98 × \(\sqrt{\frac{41.25}{5}} \approx 11.61\) Now, we compare the absolute differences calculated in Step 2: 1. \(27.4 > 11.61\) → Significant difference between states 1 and 2 2. \(10.6 < 11.61\) → No significant difference between states 1 and 3 3. \(6.4 < 11.61\) → No significant difference between states 1 and 4 4. \(16.8 > 11.61\) → Significant difference between states 2 and 3 5. \(33.8 > 11.61\) → Significant difference between states 2 and 4 6. \(17.0 > 11.61\) → Significant difference between states 3 and 4 With Tukey's paired comparisons method, we can conclude that there are significant differences between the means at the α = 0.01 level for the following pairs of states: (state 1, state 2), (state 2, state 3), (state 2, state 4), and (state 3, state 4).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Tukey's Test
Tukey's Test is a statistical method designed to find out which specific group means are different after conducting an analysis of variance (ANOVA). When we have several means to compare, such as the average cost of lumber across different states, Tukey’s Test helps identify exactly where the differences lie. It is especially useful when we have more than two samples to compare, ensuring that we catch significant differences without making a common statistical mistake called Type I error - mistakenly identifying a non-significant effect as significant contrary to the findings due to too many comparisons.
Tukey's Test operates under the assumption that the data is normally distributed and that the variances are homogeneous, meaning variations within these different groups should be similar. By comparing every possible pair of means, it helps pinpoint where specific differences indicate significant variations. If the absolute difference between any two means exceeds the critical value we calculate, that tells us there's a statistically significant difference between those two means.
Therefore, after performing an ANOVA and finding an overall significant result, you would apply Tukey's Test to determine exactly which groups are different from one another. It's like figuring out which cities have notably differing average costs, beyond just knowing there is variation without identifying which ones.
Significant Difference
A significant difference refers to a difference between group means that is strong enough to be unlikely due to chance alone. In the context of statistical testing, especially Tukey's Test, we are looking to identify pairs of group means that are notably different when accounting for sampling error.
The notion of significance in this setting is usually validated through a critical threshold or value. Once the calculated differences in means (as outlined in various steps, like between different states) are compared to this threshold, if they exceed it, that signals a significant difference. Essentially, we are finding confirmation through statistical evidence that the variations observed in data from different groups (say, from different states in our example) are likely due to true differences rather than random variability.
Such assessments allow researchers and stakeholders to make informed decisions because they can ascertain that variations are substantial and not merely noise. This is especially important in practical fields such as economics and resource management where understanding statistical significance can influence policy and financial decisions dramatically.
Critical Value
The critical value in Tukey's Test is a number that helps us determine whether the differences between means are statistically significant. This value acts kind of like a benchmark, and it is derived from the Studentized range statistic specially constructed for comparing multiple groups.
The critical value depends on several factors:
  • The selected significance level (\(\alpha = 0.01\) in our example), ensuring we have high confidence in our findings.
  • The number of groups being compared (\(k\)), as the more groups you compare, the higher the probability of variance.
  • The error degrees of freedom, which accounts for the data's variability unrelated to the testing groups.
For our case, the critical value was calculated as 4.98 because these parameters influenced the level we considered enough to assume true significance in mean differences, leading to conclusions drawn that only the largest differences are signal-worthy. Understanding and finding this critical value is core to executing Tukey’s test accurately.
Mean Square Error
The Mean Square Error (MSE) is a core component in ANOVA and Tucker's Test calculations. It essentially measures the average of the squares of errors—that is, the average squared differences between what was estimated and the actual observed data points.
In simpler terms, it's a measure of the variance or dispersion in the data. A small mean square error indicates your predictions are close to the observed results, meaning less unexplained variability. Think of it like understanding how tightly data points cluster around a mean; closer means more consistency between observations.
In Tukey's Test, the MSE becomes part of calculating the least significant difference (LSD) for paired comparisons. With our example MSE = 41.25, it guided us through assessing the precise threshold between statistical significance and mere fluctuation. Thus, MSE not only plays a role in helping determine the size of the critical value needed for significant differences but also enhances how confidently one can interpret the differences found in group means. Knowing the MSE is essential because it anchors our understanding of what variations are normal and which ones truly stand out.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A nationa home builder wants to compare the prices per 1,000 board feet of standard or better grade Douglas fir framing lumber. He randomly selects five suppliers in each of the four states where the builder is planning to begin construction. The prices are given in the table. $$ \begin{array}{rrrr} && {\text { State }} \\ \hline 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \$ 241 & \$ 216 & \$ 230 & \$ 245 \\ 235 & 220 & 225 & 250 \\ 238 & 205 & 235 & 238 \\ 247 & 213 & 228 & 255 \\ 250 & 220 & 240 & 255 \end{array} $$ a. What type of experimental design has been used? b. Construct the analysis of variance table for this data. c. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the average price per 1000 board feet of Douglas fir differs among the four states? Test using \(\alpha=.05\)

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of management training on the decision-making abilities of supervisors in a large corporation. Sixteen supervisors were selected, and eight were randomly chosen to receive managerial training. Four trained and four untrained supervisors were then randomly selected to function in a situation in which a standard problem arose. The other eight supervisors were presented with an emergency situation in which standard procedures could not be used. The response was a management behavior rating for each supervisor as assessed by a rating scheme devised by the experimenter. a. What are the experimental units in this experiment? b. What are the two factors considered in the experiment? c. What are the levels of each factor? \(?\) ? d. How many treatments are there in the experiment? e. What type of experimental design has been used?

A study was conducted to compare automobile gasoline mileage for three formulations of gasoline. A was a non-leaded 87 octane formulation, \(\mathrm{B}\) was a non-leaded 91 octane formulation, and \(\mathrm{C}\) was a non-leaded 87 octane formulation with \(15 \%\) ethanol. Four automobiles, all of the same make and model, were used in the experiment, and each formulation was tested in each automobile. Using each formulation in the same automobile has the effect of eliminating (blocking out) automobile-toautomobile variability. The data (in miles per gallon) follow. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} && {\text { Automobile }} \\ \hline \text { Formulation } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \mathrm{A} & 25.7 & 27.0 & 27.3 & 26.1 \\ \mathrm{~B} & 27.2 & 28.1 & 27.9 & 27.7 \\ \mathrm{C} & 26.1 & 27.5 & 26.8 & 27.8 \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean mileage per gallon for the three gasoline formulations? b. Is there evidence of a difference in mean mileage for the four automobiles? c. Suppose that prior to looking at the data, you had decided to compare the mean mileage per gallon for formulations A and B. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for this difference. d. Use an appropriate method to identify the pairwise differences, if any, in the average mileages for the three formulations.

Suppose you wish to compare the means of four populations based on independent random samples, each of which contains six observations. Insert, in an ANOVA table, the sources of variation and their respective degrees of freedom.

An article in Archaeometry involved an analysis of 26 samples of Romano- British pottery, found at four different kiln sites in the United Kingdom. \(^{9}\) Since one site only yielded two samples, consider the samples found at the other three sites. The samples were analyzed to determine their chemical composition and the percentage of iron oxide is shown below. a. What type of experimental design is this? b. Use an analysis of variance to determine if there is a difference in the average percentage of iron oxide at the three sites. Use \(\alpha=.01\). c. If you have access to a computer program, generate the diagnostic plots for this experiment. Does it appear that any of the analysis of variance assumptions have been violated? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.