/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 A producer of machine parts clai... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A producer of machine parts claimed that the diameters of the connector rods produced by his plant had a variance of at most .03 inch \(^{2}\). A random sample of 15 connector rods produced by his plant produced a sample mean and variance of .55 inch and .053 inch \(^{2},\) respectively. a. Is there sufficient evidence to reject his claim at the \(\alpha=.05\) level of significance? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the variance of the rod diameters.

Short Answer

Expert verified
What is the 95% confidence interval for the population variance? Answer: Yes, there is sufficient evidence to reject the producer's claim at the α=0.05 level of significance. The 95% confidence interval for the population variance is (0.03097, 0.12185).

Step by step solution

01

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis: The population variance, σ^2, is at most 0.03 inch^2 (σ^2 ≤ 0.03) The alternative hypothesis: The population variance, σ^2, is greater than 0.03 inch^2 (σ^2 > 0.03)
02

Apply the Chi-square test statistic

To calculate the test statistic, we will use the sample size (n = 15), sample variance (s^2 = .053) and the population variance according to the null hypothesis (σ^2 = 0.03). The test statistic is calculated as: Chi-square test statistic, \(χ^2 = (n-1) * (s^2 / σ^2) = (15-1) * (0.053 / 0.03)\)
03

Calculate the critical value

We need to find the critical value for a chi-square distribution with 14 degrees of freedom and a significance level of α = 0.05. The rejection region for the null hypothesis is in the upper tail, so we will look up the value for \(χ^2_{1 - α, df}\): \(χ^2_{0.95,14}\)
04

Compare the test statistic to the critical value

If the calculated chi-square test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
05

Find a 95% confidence interval for the variance

To find a 95% confidence interval for the population variance, we will use the sample variance (s^2 = 0.053) and the chi-square distribution with 14 degrees of freedom. The confidence interval is given by: \(((n-1)s^2) / (χ^2_{1 - α/2}) ≤ σ^2 ≤ ((n-1)s^2) / (χ^2_{α/2})\) Substitute the given values and calculate the confidence interval. #Solution#
06

Calculate the Chi-square test statistic

Chi-square test statistic, \(χ^2 = (15-1) * (0.053 / 0.03) = 14 * (0.053 / 0.03) \approx 24.53\)
07

Find the critical value

From the chi-square distribution table, \(χ^2_{0.95,14} \approx 23.685\)
08

Compare the test statistic to the critical value

Since the calculated test statistic (24.53) is greater than the critical value (23.685), we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to reject the producer's claim at the α=0.05 level of significance.
09

Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the variance

Using the chi-square distribution table, we find \(χ^2_{0.025,14} \approx 6.571\) and \(χ^2_{0.975,14} \approx 29.141\) \(((15-1)*0.053) / 29.141 ≤ σ^2 ≤ ((15-1)*0.053) / 6.571\) \(0.03097 ≤ σ^2 ≤ 0.12185\) The 95% confidence interval for the population variance is (0.03097, 0.12185).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental part of statistical analysis, used to make informed conclusions about a population parameter based on sample data. In any hypothesis test, two competing statements or hypotheses are considered:
  • The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) represents the status quo or a statement of no effect or difference. In the example, \(H_0\) claims the variance is at most 0.03 inch².
  • The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) reflects a new claim or the opposite of the null. Here, \(H_a\) suggests the variance is greater than 0.03 inch².
By comparing observed data with what we would expect under the null, we decide whether to reject the null hypothesis, often using a test statistic, and a predefined level of significance.
Chi-square Distribution
The chi-square distribution is heavily used in hypothesis testing, especially when dealing with variances. It is a continuous probability distribution that is particularly suited for tests of variance. In the exercise, the chi-square test statistic was calculated using the formula:\[χ^2 = (n-1) \times \frac{s^2}{σ^2}\]where:
  • \(n\) is the sample size.
  • \(s^2\) represents the sample variance.
  • \(σ^2\) is the hypothesized population variance.
The resulting chi-square statistic helps us compare whether the sample variance significantly differs from the hypothesized variance, guiding us on rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of plausible values for a population parameter, offering more insight than a single estimate alone. To calculate a confidence interval for variance using the chi-square distribution, we employ the formula:\[((n-1)s^2) / χ^2_{1 - α/2} \leq σ^2 \leq ((n-1)s^2) / χ^2_{α/2}\]This approach yields a range in which the true population variance likely falls. In this case study, a 95% confidence interval means that if we were to draw many samples and calculate a confidence interval from each, about 95% of those intervals would contain the true variance.
Variance
Variance measures how much values in a data set differ from the mean. It provides an indication of data spread or dispersion. A higher variance means data are more spread out, while lower variance indicates data points are closer to the mean. In the context of this exercise, the producer claims the variance of the diameters is at most 0.03 inch², indicating a belief in a controlled, consistent production process. However, the sample variance obtained was 0.053 inch², suggesting more variability than the claimed specification.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \(α\), is the threshold used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly set at 0.05, it represents a 5% risk level of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (Type I error). In this exercise, a 0.05 significance level was used, meaning there must be strong enough evidence against the null for it to be rejected. When the test statistic exceeds the critical value from the chi-square distribution table corresponding to this significance level, it leads us to reject the null hypothesis, showing that the sample results are unlikely to have occurred under the assumption of \(H_0\).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cholesterol The serum cholesterol Elevels of 50 subjects randomly selected from the L.A. Heart Data, data from an epidemiological heart disease study on Los Angeles County employees, follow. \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}148 & 304 & 300 & 240 & 368 & 139 & 203 & 249 & 265 & 229 \\ 303 & 315 & 174 & 209 & 253 & 169 & 170 & 254 & 212 & 255 \\ 262 & 284 & 275 & 229 & 261 & 239 & 254 & 222 & 273 & 299 \\ 278 & 227 & 220 & 260 & 221 & 247 & 178 & 204 & 250 & 256 \\ 305 & 225 & 306 & 184 & 242 & 282 & 311 & 271 & 276 & 248\end{array}\) a. Construct a histogram for the data. Are the data approximately mound- shaped? b. Use a \(t\) -distribution to construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the average serum cholesterol levels for L.A. County employees.

In a study of the infestation of the Thenus orientalis lobster by two types of barnacles, Octolasmis tridens and \(O .\) lowei, the carapace lengths (in millimeters) of 10 randomly selected lobsters caught in the seas near Singapore are measured: \(\begin{array}{llll}78 & 66 & 65 & 63\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lll}60 & 60 & 58\end{array}\) $$ \begin{array}{lll} 56 & 52 & 50 \end{array} $$ Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean carapace length of the \(T\). orientalis lobsters.

Although there are many treatments for bulimia nervosa, some subjects fail to benefit from treatment. In a study to determine which factors predict who will benefit from treatment, an article in the British Journal of Clinical Psychology indicates that self-esteem was one of these important predictors. The table gives the mean and standard deviation of self-esteem scores prior to treatment, at post treatment, and during a follow-up: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Pretreatment } & \text { Posttreatment } & \text { Follow-up } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } \bar{x} & 20.3 & 26.6 & 27.7 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } s & 5.0 & 7.4 & 8.2 \\ \text { Sample Size } n & 21 & 21 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Use a test of hypothesis to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true pretreatment mean is less than 25 . b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the true posttreatment mean. c. In Section 10.4 , we will introduce small-sample techniques for making inferences about the difference between two population means. Without the formality of a statistical test, what are you willing to conclude about the differences among the three sampled population means represented by the results in the table?

Two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=4\) and \(n_{2}=5\) are selected from each of two normal populations: \begin{tabular}{l|ccccc} Population 1 & 12 & 3 & 8 & 5 & \\ \hline Population 2 & 14 & 7 & 7 & 9 & 6 \end{tabular} a. Calculate \(s^{2},\) the pooled estimator of \(\sigma^{2}\). b. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right),\) the difference between the two population means. c. Test \(H_{0}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)=0\) against \(H_{\mathrm{a}}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)<0\) for \(\alpha=.05 .\) State your conclusions.

An experiment was conducted to compare the mean lengths of time required for the bodily absorption of two drugs \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\). Ten people were randomly selected and assigned to receive one of the drugs. The length of time (in minutes) for the drug to reach a specified level in the blood was recorded, and the data summary is given in the table: Drug A Drug B \(\bar{x}_{1}=27.2 \quad \bar{x}_{2}=33.5\) \(s_{1}^{2}=16.36 \quad s_{2}^{2}=18.92\) a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean times to absorption for the two drugs? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test. Does this value confirm your conclusions? c. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean times to absorption. Does the interval confirm your conclusions in part a?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.