/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 A cannery prints "weight 16 ounc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A cannery prints "weight 16 ounces" on its label. The quality control supervisor selects nine cans at random and weighs them. She finds \(\bar{x}=15.7\) and \(s=.5 .\) Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean weight is less than that claimed on the label?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of the cans is less than the claimed weight on the label.

Step by step solution

01

State the null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H鈧) is that the true mean weight of the cans is equal to the claimed weight on the label. The alternative hypothesis (H鈧) is that the true mean weight is less than the claimed weight. Mathematically, we have: H鈧: 渭 = 16 ounces H鈧: 渭 < 16 ounces
02

Calculate the test statistic

Given the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)), sample standard deviation (s), and sample size (n), we can calculate the test statistic (t) using the following formula: t = \(($$ \bar{x} - \mu $$)/($$ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} $$)\) Where: \(\bar{x}\) = 15.7 (sample mean) 渭 = 16 (claimed mean weight) s = 0.5 (sample standard deviation) n = 9 (sample size) t = (15.7 - 16) / (0.5 / \(\sqrt{9}\)) = -1.8
03

Determine the critical value and rejection region

Since this is a one-tailed t-test, we will determine the critical value based on the desired significance level (伪). We can use a common 伪 value of 0.05 for this example. With a sample size of 9, we have 8 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1). Using a t-distribution table or calculator, we find the critical value (t伪) for a one-tailed test with 伪 = 0.05 and df = 8: t伪 = -1.860 The rejection region is the set of all values of the test statistic that would lead us to reject the null hypothesis. For a one-tailed test with the alternative hypothesis stating that the true mean is less than the claimed value, we reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is less than the critical value: Rejection region: t < -1.860
04

Make a decision and interpret the results

We will now compare the test statistic (t) to the critical value (t伪) in order to make a decision about the null hypothesis: t = -1.8 t伪 = -1.860 Since our test statistic (-1.8) is greater than the critical value (-1.860), we fail to reject the null hypothesis (H鈧). In conclusion, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of the cans is less than the claimed weight on the label.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 2.36 the number of passes completed by Brett Favre, quarterback for the Green Bay Packers, was recorded for each of the 16 regular season games in the fall of 2006 (ESPN.com): \(^{3}\) $$ \begin{array}{lllrll} 15 & 31 & 25 & 22 & 22 & 19 \\ 17 & 28 & 24 & 5 & 22 & 24 \\ 22 & 20 & 26 & 21 & & \end{array} $$ a. A stem and leaf plot of the \(n=16\) observations is shown below: Based on this plot, is it reasonable to assume that the underlying population is approximately normal, as required for the one-sample \(t\) -test? Explain. b. Calculate the mean and standard deviation for Brett Favre's per game pass completions. c. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the per game pass completions per game for Brett Favre.

To properly treat patients, drugs prescribed by physicians must have a potency that is accurately defined. Consequently, not only must the distribution of potency values for shipments of a drug have a mean value as specified on the drug's container, but also the variation in potency must be small. Otherwise, pharmacists would be distributing drug prescriptions that could be harmfully potent or have a low potency and be ineffective. A drug manufacturer claims that his drug is marketed with a potency of \(5 \pm .1\) milligram per cubic centimeter \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}), \mathrm{A}\) random sample of four containers gave potency readings equal to \(4.94,5.09,5.03,\) and \(4.90 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}\) a. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean potency differs from \(5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} ?\) b. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the variation in potency differs from the error limits specified by the manufacturer? [HINT: It is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what is meant by limits on potency as specified by a manufacturer. Since he implies that the potency values will fall into the interval \(5 \pm .1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}\) with very high probability - the implication is always-let us assume that the range \(.2 ;\) or \((4.9\) to 5.1\(),\) represents \(6 \sigma,\) as suggested by the Empirical Rule. Note that letting the range equal \(6 \sigma\) rather than \(4 \sigma\) places a stringent interpretation on the manufacturer's claim. We want the potency to fall into the interval \(5 \pm .1\) with very high probability.

Before contracting to have stereo music piped into each of his suites of offices, an executive had his office manager randomly select seven offices in which to have the system installed. The average time (in minutes) spent outside these offices per excursion among the employees involved was recorded before and after the music system was installed with the following results. \(\begin{array}{llllllll}\text { Office Number } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllllll}\text { No Music } & 8 & 9 & 5 & 6 & 5 & 10 & 7 \\\ \text { Music } & 5 & 6 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8\end{array}\) Would you suggest that the executive proceed with the installation? Conduct an appropriate test of hypothesis. Find the approximate \(p\) -value and interpret your results.

A chemical manufacturer claims that the purity of his product never varies by more than \(2 \% .\) Five batches were tested and given purity readings of \(98.2,97.1,98.9,97.7,\) and \(97.9 \%\). a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to contradict the manufacturer's claim? (HINT: To be generous, let a range of \(2 \%\) equal \(4 \sigma .)\) b. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\sigma^{2}\).

A random sample of \(n=15\) observations was selected from a normal population. The sample mean and variance were \(\bar{x}=3.91\) and \(s^{2}=.3214 .\) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance \(\sigma^{2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.