/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 A paired-difference experiment c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A paired-difference experiment consists of \(n=18\) pairs, \(\bar{d}=5.7,\) and \(s_{d}^{2}=256 .\) Suppose you wish to detect \(\mu_{d}>0\). a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. b. Conduct the test and state your conclusions.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on a paired-difference experiment with a sample size of 18 pairs, a mean difference of 5.7, and a variance of differences of 256, we performed a hypothesis test to determine if the true mean difference is greater than 0. We defined the null hypothesis as no difference between the means (μd = 0), and the alternative hypothesis as the true mean difference being greater than 0 (μd > 0). By calculating the test statistic (t ≈ 1.463) and comparing it to the critical value (t_critical ≈ 1.740) at a 0.05 significance level, we failed to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean difference is greater than 0 at the 0.05 significance level.

Step by step solution

01

a. Null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that there is no difference between the means, meaning \(\mu_d = 0\). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that the true mean difference is greater than 0, or \(\mu_d > 0\). So, we have: \(H_0: \mu_d = 0\) \(H_1: \mu_d > 0\)
02

b. Conduct the test and state your conclusions

To conduct the test, we first need to calculate the test statistic. We will use the t-test statistic, which is given by: \(t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}\) Here, \(\bar{d} = 5.7\), \(\mu_d = 0\) (under null hypothesis), \(s_d^2 = 256\), and \(n = 18\). First, we calculate the standard deviation of the differences: \(s_d = \sqrt{s_d^2} = \sqrt{256} = 16\) Now, we can calculate the test statistic: \(t = \frac{5.7 - 0}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{18}}} = \frac{5.7}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{18}}} \approx 1.463\) Next, we need to choose a significance level (\(\alpha\)) for the test. Common choices are 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1. Let's choose a significance level of 0.05, meaning there's a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. Since this is a one-tailed test (we're testing for \(\mu_d > 0\)), we will find the critical value of t with 17 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1): \(t_{critical} = t_{0.05, 17} \approx 1.740\) Now, we compare the test statistic to the critical value: \(t = 1.463 < 1.740 = t_{critical}\) Since the test statistic is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
03

Conclusion

Based on the results of the test, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean difference (\(\mu_d\)) is greater than 0, at the 0.05 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental concept in statistical testing, representing the default position that there is no effect or no difference in a given experiment. When dealing with paired difference experiments, it's essentially stating that the mean difference between paired observations is zero, indicating no change or effect. In the context of the provided exercise, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is formally defined as the true mean difference, \(\mu_d = 0\), which implies that any observed difference in the paired samples is due to random chance.

Understanding the null hypothesis is crucial because it sets the benchmark for statistical significance. If we can provide enough evidence to refute the null hypothesis, we can then explore the alternative hypothesis, which suggests that there is indeed an effect or a difference. However, if we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we are not necessarily proving it true; we are simply stating that we do not have sufficient evidence against it.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as (\(H_1\) or \(H_a\)), posits the presence of an effect or a difference between pairs in a paired-difference experiment. It is the opposite of what is stated in the null hypothesis. In the exercise, the alternative hypothesis is set to test whether the true mean difference is greater than zero, \(\mu_d > 0\).

When formulating an alternative hypothesis, it's articulated based on what we genuinely expect to find or aim to provide evidence for. In our exercise, the expectation is that the mean difference \(\mu_d\) is positive, meaning there's an actual increase or improvement when comparing the paired samples. It's important to note that statistical tests do not confirm the alternative hypothesis but can only provide evidence to reject the null in favor of considering the alternative. This makes understanding both hypotheses vital for interpreting the results correctly.
T-Test
The t-test is a statistical procedure used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two sets of data. In a paired-difference experiment, a specific type of t-test called the paired sample t-test is used. This test compares the means from two related groups to determine if there is a statistically significant average difference between these two groups.

The t-test statistic is calculated by the formula \(t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}\), where \(\bar{d}\) is the mean difference of the sample, \(\mu_d\) is the mean difference under the null hypothesis (typically 0), \(s_d\) is the standard deviation of the differences, and \(n\) is the sample size. After the test statistic is calculated, it is then compared to a critical value from the t-distribution based on the chosen significance level. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

In our example, the calculated t-value did not exceed the critical t-value; therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level, suggesting that there is not enough evidence to support a significant difference in the mean of the paired differences. It's essential to select a suitable significance level and understand test statistic calculations and critical values to make accurate inferences from a t-test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What assumptions are made when Student's \(t\) -test is used to test a hypothesis concerning a population mean?

A random sample of \(n=15\) observations was selected from a normal population. The sample mean and variance were \(\bar{x}=3.91\) and \(s^{2}=.3214 .\) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance \(\sigma^{2}\).

In a study of the infestation of the Thenus orientalis lobster by two types of barnacles, Octolasmis tridens and \(O .\) lowei, the carapace lengths (in millimeters) of 10 randomly selected lobsters caught in the seas near Singapore are measured: \(\begin{array}{llll}78 & 66 & 65 & 63\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lll}60 & 60 & 58\end{array}\) $$ \begin{array}{lll} 56 & 52 & 50 \end{array} $$ Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean carapace length of the \(T\). orientalis lobsters.

A paired-difference experiment was conducted to compare the means of two populations: Pairs Population 2 3 4 5 \(\begin{array}{llllll}1 & 1.3 & 1.6 & 1.1 & 1.4 & 1.7 \\\ 2 & 1.2 & 1.5 & 1.1 & 1.2 & 1.8\end{array}\) a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that \(\mu_{1}\) differs from \(\mu_{2}\) ? Test using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test and interpret its value. c. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right) .\) Compare your interpretation of the confidence interval with your test results in part a. d. What assumptions must you make for your inferences to be valid?

In Exercise 10.6 we presented data on the estimated average price for a 6 -ounce can or a 7.06 -ounce pouch of tuna, based on prices paid nationally in supermarkets. A portion of the data is reproduced in the table below. Use the MINI TAB printout to answer the questions. \begin{tabular}{rr|rr} Light Tuna in Water & \multicolumn{2}{|l} { Light Tuna in 0il } \\ \hline .99 & .53 & 2.56 & .62 \\ 1.92 & 1.41 & 1.92 & .66 \\ 1.23 & 1.12 & 1.30 & .62 \\ .85 & .63 & 1.79 & .65 \\ .65 & .67 & 1.23 & .60 \\ .69 & .60 & & .67 \\ 60 & .66 & & \end{tabular} MINI TAB output for Exercise 10.25 Two-Sample T-Test and Cl: Water, Oil Two-sample T for Water vs Oil Mean StDev \(\mathrm{SE}\) Mean 1 er \(0.896 \quad 0.400 \quad 0 .\) 11 1.147 0.679 0.2 Difference \(=\) mu (Water) - mu (Oil) Estimate for difference: -0.251 958 CI for difference: (-0.700,0.198) T-Test of difference \(=0\) (vs not \(=\) ): T-value \(=-1.16\) P-Value \(=0.260 \quad D F=23\) Both use Pooled StDev \(=0.5389\) a. Do the data in the table present sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the average prices of light tuna in water versus oil? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. What is the \(p\) -value for the test? c. The MINITAB analysis uses the pooled estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\). Is the assumption of equal variances reasonable? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.