/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a \(N\left(\theta, \sigma^{2}\right)\) distribution, where \(\sigma^{2}\) is fixed but \(-\infty<\theta<\infty\) (a) Show that the mle of \(\theta\) is \(\bar{X}\). (b) If \(\theta\) is restricted by \(0 \leq \theta<\infty\), show that the mle of \(\theta\) is \(\widehat{\theta}=\max \\{0, \bar{X}\\}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The MLE of \(\theta\) is \(\bar{X}\) in the unrestricted case, and \(max\{0, \bar{X}\}\) with the restriction \(0 \leq \theta<\infty\).

Step by step solution

01

Derive the Likelihood Function

Given a random sample \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) from a normalized distribution with known variance \(\sigma^{2}\) and unknown mean \(\theta\), the joint probability density function can be written as \(L(\theta)=\prod_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma} e^{-\frac{(X_{i}-\theta)^{2}}{2 \sigma^{2}}}\). This is the so-called likelihood function, which we want to maximize with respect to \(\theta\).
02

Apply Logarithmic Function to Simplify

To simplify derivation, take the natural logarithm (ln) forming the log-likelihood function, \(ln(L(\theta))=-\frac{n}{2} ln(2 \pi \sigma^{2})-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_{i}-\theta)^{2}\). The first term is a constant with respect to \(\theta\) and can be ignored while maximizing the likelihood.
03

Finding the Derivative to Locate Maximum

Find the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\theta\) and equate to 0 to locate the maximum. We get \(\frac{d ln(L(\theta))}{d \theta}=\frac{1}{\sigma^{2}} \sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_{i}-\theta)=0\). Rearranging gives \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_{i}-\theta)=0\). Solving for \(\theta\) gives \(\theta=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\), which is the sample mean, \(\bar{X}\). Hence the MLE of \(\theta\) is \( \bar{X}\) in the unrestricted case.
04

Finding Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimate

When \(0 \leq \theta<\infty\), the likelihood function is still maximized at \(\bar{X}\). However, if \(\bar{X}\) falls below 0, the maximum likelihood within the restricted range is at 0 because the normal distribution is symmetric about \(\theta\). Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimate for \(\theta\), given the restrictions is \(max\{0, \bar{X}\}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recall that \(\widehat{\theta}=-n / \sum_{i=1}^{n} \log X_{i}\) is the mle of \(\theta\) for a beta \((\theta, 1)\) distribution. Also, \(W=-\sum_{i=1}^{n} \log X_{i}\) has the gamma distribution \(\Gamma(n, 1 / \theta)\). (a) Show that \(2 \theta W\) has a \(\chi^{2}(2 n)\) distribution. (b) Using part (a), find \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\) so that $$P\left(c_{1}<\frac{2 \theta n}{\hat{\theta}}

Suppose \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) are iid with pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=(1 / \theta) e^{-x / \theta}, 0

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a \(\Gamma(\alpha, \beta)\) distribution where \(\alpha\) is known and \(\beta>0\). Determine the likelihood ratio test for \(H_{0}: \beta=\beta_{0}\) against \(H_{1}: \beta \neq \beta_{0}\)

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a \(N(0, \theta)\) distribution. We want to estimate the standard deviation \(\sqrt{\theta}\). Find the constant \(c\) so that \(Y=\) \(c \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left|X_{i}\right|\) is an unbiased estimator of \(\sqrt{\theta}\) and determine its efficiency.

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) and \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{m}\) be independent random samples from the distributions \(N\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{3}\right)\) and \(N\left(\theta_{2}, \theta_{4}\right)\), respectively. (a) Show that the likelihood ratio for testing \(H_{0}: \theta_{1}=\theta_{2}, \theta_{3}=\theta_{4}\) against all alternatives is given by $$\frac{\left[\sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} / n\right]^{n / 2}\left[\sum_{1}^{m}\left(y_{i}-\bar{y}\right)^{2} / m\right]^{m / 2}}{\left\\{\left[\sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-u\right)^{2}+\sum_{1}^{m}\left(y_{i}-u\right)^{2}\right] /(m+n)\right\\}^{(n+m) / 2}},$$ where \(u=(n \bar{x}+m \bar{y}) /(n+m)\). (b) Show that the likelihood ratio test for testing \(H_{0}: \theta_{3}=\theta_{4}, \theta_{1}\) and \(\theta_{2}\) unspecified, against \(H_{1}: \theta_{3} \neq \theta_{4}, \theta_{1}\) and \(\theta_{2}\) unspecified, can be based on the random variable $$F=\frac{\sum_{1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\bar{X}\right)^{2} /(n-1)}{\sum_{1}^{m}\left(Y_{i}-\bar{Y}\right)^{2} /(m-1)}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.