/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Show that the square of a noncen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 9: Problem 4

Show that the square of a noncentral \(T\) random variable is a noncentral \(F\) random variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The square of a noncentral \(T\) random variable is a noncentral \(F\) random variable. This is due to the underlying mathematical definitions and properties of these distributions.

Step by step solution

01

Define a Noncentral \(T\) Distribution

A noncentral \(T\) variable may be defined as the ratio \(T = X / \sqrt{Y}\), where \(X\) follows a normal distribution with mean \(\mu\) and standard deviation \(1\), and \(Y\) follows a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom. It's essential to note that \(X\) and \(Y\) are independent random variables.
02

Square the Noncentral \(T\) Distribution

Squaring the \(T\) random variable yields \(T^2 = X^2 / Y\). The \(X^2\) term is a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom, and \(Y\) is a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom, based on the definition from Step 1.
03

Define a Noncentral \(F\) Distribution

A noncentral \(F\) distribution is defined as the ratio of two independent chi-square random variables each divided by their respective degrees of freedom. In other words, let \(Z_1\) and \(Z_2\) be independent random variables each following chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom \(d_1\) and \(d_2\) respectively, then the noncentral \(F\) distribution can be defined as \(F = Z_1/d_1 / Z_2/d_2 = Z_1 / Z_2\) if \(d_1 = d_2 = 1\).
04

Compare \(T^2\) and \(F\) Definitions

Compare the \(T^2\) and \(F\) distribution definitions. \(T^2 = X^2 / Y\) matches the definition of a noncentral \(F\) distribution if both \(X^2\) and \(Y\) are chi-square with one degree of freedom. Hence, this shows that the square of the noncentral \(T\) random variable is a noncentral \(F\) random variable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mathbf{X}^{\prime}=\left[X_{1}, X_{2}\right]\) be bivariate normal with matrix of means \(\boldsymbol{\mu}^{\prime}=\left[\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}\right]\) and positive definite covariance matrix \(\mathbf{\Sigma}\). Let $$ Q_{1}=\frac{X_{1}^{2}}{\sigma_{1}^{2}\left(1-\rho^{2}\right)}-2 \rho \frac{X_{1} X_{2}}{\sigma_{1} \sigma_{2}\left(1-\rho^{2}\right)}+\frac{X_{2}^{2}}{\sigma_{2}^{2}\left(1-\rho^{2}\right)} $$ Show that \(Q_{1}\) is \(\chi^{2}(r, \theta)\) and find \(r\) and \(\theta\). When and only when does \(Q_{1}\) have a central chi-square distribution?

Using the background of the two-way classification with one observation per cell, show that the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\alpha_{i}, \beta_{j}\), and \(\mu\) are \(\hat{\alpha}_{i}=\bar{X}_{i .}-\bar{X}_{. .}\) \(\hat{\beta}_{j}=\bar{X}_{. j}-\bar{X}_{. .}\), and \(\hat{\mu}=\bar{X}_{. .}\), respectively. Show that these are unbiased estimators of their respective parameters and compute \(\operatorname{var}\left(\hat{\alpha}_{i}\right), \operatorname{var}\left(\hat{\beta}_{j}\right)\), and \(\operatorname{var}(\hat{\mu})\).

Let the independent normal random variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have, respectively, the probability density functions \(N\left(\mu, \gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\right), i=1,2, \ldots, n\), where the given \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal and no one of which is zero. Discuss the test of the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \gamma=1, \mu\) unspecified, against all alternatives \(H_{1}: \gamma \neq 1, \mu\) unspecified.

Let \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) be two nonnegative quadratic forms in the observations of a random sample from a distribution which is \(N\left(0, \sigma^{2}\right) .\) Show that another quadratic form \(Q\) is independent of \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) if and only if \(Q\) is independent of each of \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) Hint: \(\quad\) Consider the orthogonal transformation that diagonalizes the matrix of \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). After this transformation, what are the forms of the matrices \(Q, Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) if \(Q\) and \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) are independent?

The driver of a diesel-powered automobile decided to test the quality of three types of diesel fuel sold in the area based on mpg. Test the null hypothesis that the three means are equal using the following data. Make the usual assumptions and take \(\alpha=0.05\). $$ \begin{array}{llllll} \text { Brand A: } & 38.7 & 39.2 & 40.1 & 38.9 & \\ \text { Brand B: } & 41.9 & 42.3 & 41.3 & & \\ \text { Brand C: } & 40.8 & 41.2 & 39.5 & 38.9 & 40.3 \end{array} $$
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.