/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Conroe Company is reviewing the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Conroe Company is reviewing the data provided by its management accounting system. Which of the following statements is/are correct? I. \(A\) cost driver is a causal factor that increases the total cost of a cost object. II. cost drivers may be volume based or activity based. III. cost drivers are normally the largest cost in the manufacturing process. 1\. I, II and III are correct 2\. I and II only are correct. 3\. I only is correct. 4\. Il and III only are correct.

Short Answer

Expert verified
2. I and II only are correct.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing Statement I

"A cost driver is a causal factor that increases the total cost of a cost object." This statement is correct. A cost driver is a factor that directly impacts the cost of an activity or a cost object, which can lead to an increase in the total cost.
02

Analyzing Statement II

"Cost drivers may be volume-based or activity-based." This statement is also correct. Cost drivers can be grouped into two broad categories: (1) volume-based cost drivers, which consider the quantity of products or services produced or provided, and (2) activity-based cost drivers, which consider the different activities or processes that contribute to the cost of the products or services.
03

Analyzing Statement III

"Cost drivers are normally the largest cost in the manufacturing process." This statement is incorrect. Cost drivers are the factors that help allocate the cost of a particular activity or resource, but they are not necessarily the largest cost within the manufacturing process. There can be various cost factors in manufacturing that contribute to the overall cost, and cost drivers help distribute these costs accurately. In conclusion, statements I and II are correct.
04

Choosing the correct answer

Based on our analysis, we can choose the corresponding answer: 2\. I and II only are correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost Driver
A cost driver in accounting serves as a pivotal element in the cost accounting function. It is essentially the root cause behind the occurrence of a cost. The main purpose of identifying a cost driver is to accurately attribute costs to production or service activities, and it operates under the principle that different cost incurrences can be traced back to specific elements prompting those expenses.

For example, consider a company that incurs electricity costs. The cost driver could be the number of machine hours since machines operating for longer durations will consume more electricity. Identifying and understanding cost drivers is crucial for businesses because it allows for more precise cost allocation and aids in analyzing the factors causing costs to change, hence fostering better budgeting and decision-making.

By dissecting a cost driver, companies can identify opportunities to reduce costs or improve efficiency. For instance, if a company discerns that machine breakdowns (a cost driver for maintenance expenses) are frequent, it may invest in more reliable equipment to reduce such maintenance costs in the future.
Volume-Based Cost Driver
A volume-based cost driver is tied to the number of units produced or the scale of services offered by a business. Essentially, it assumes that the underlying expenses of a cost object vary in line with the total output volume. Common examples include direct labor hours, machine hours, or the number of units produced.

For instance, suppose a factory which manufactures toys may use the number of toys produced as a volume-based cost driver. If more toys are made, the cost of materials and labor will generally increase. This form of cost allocation is more traditional and is rooted in the assumption of a direct relationship between the volume of output and the costs incurred.



However, one needs to be cautious because volume-based costing might not always accurately reflect the true costs, especially in complex, multi-faceted operations. It can sometimes overlook the nuances of modern manufacturing practices, which may involve a variety of different processes, requiring different levels of effort, that don't scale uniformly with output volume.
Activity-Based Cost Driver
In contrast to volume-based cost drivers, activity-based cost drivers are associated with the actual activities that are responsible for incurring costs. This approach to cost driving recognizes that the activities causing costs may not always be directly proportional to the number of units produced.

Examples of activity-based cost drivers include the number of setup hours, the number of quality inspections, or the quantity of material handling operations. Taking a software company as an example, the number of code reviews might be an activity-based cost driver that affects the overall project cost independent of the volume of software units produced.

Activity-based costing (ABC) helps in pinpointing non-value-adding processes and provides insights into the true cost of carrying out certain activities. Therefore, it promotes more strategic decision-making by enabling management to improve or eliminate processes that disproportionately consume resources. This system is particularly useful in complex environments with a diverse mix of products and services, as it provides a more nuanced understanding of costs compared to volume-based drivers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why should managers worry about product overcosting or undercosting?

The job-costing system at Melody's Custom Framing has five indirect cost pools (purchasing, material handling, machine maintenance, product inspection, and packaging) The company is in the process of bidding on two jobs: Job \(220,\) an order of 17 intricate personalized frames, and Job 330 , an order of 5 standard personalized frames. The controller wants you to compare overhead allocated under the current simple job-costing system and a newly designed activity-based job-costing system. Total budgeted costs in each indirect-cost pool and the budgeted quantity of activity driver are as follows. Information related to Job 220 and Job 330 follows. Job 220 incurs more batch- level costs because it uses more types of materials that need to be purchased, moved, and inspected relative to Job 330 . 1\. Compute the total overhead allocated to each job under a simple costing system, where overhead is allocated based on machine-hours. 2\. Compute the total overhead allocated to each job under an activity-based costing system using the appropriate activity drivers. 3\. Explain why Melody's Custom Framing might favor the ABC job-costing system over the simple jobcosting system, especially in its bidding process.

What are the key reasons for product cost differences between simple costing systems and ABC systems?

Pharmahelp, Inc., a distributor of special pharmaceutical products, operates at capacity and has three main market segments: a. General supermarket chains b. Drugstore chains c. Mom-and-pop single-store pharmacies Rick Flair, the new controller of Pharmahelp, reported the following data for 2017 . For manyyears, Pharmahelp has used gross margin percentage [(Revenue - cost of goods sold) \div Revenue] to evaluate the relative profitability of its market segments. But Flair recently attended a seminar on activity-based costing and is considering using it at Pharmahelp to analyze and allocate "other operating costs." He meets with all the key managers and several of his operations and sales staff, and they agree that there are five key activities that drive other operating costs at Pharmahelp: Each customer order consists of one or more line items. A line item represents a single product (such as Extra-Strength Tylenol Tablets). Each product line item is delivered in one or more separate cartons. Each store delivery entails the delivery of one or more cartons of products to a customer. Pharmahelp's staff stacks cartons directly onto display shelves in customers' stores. Currently, there is no additional charge to the customer for shelf-stocking and not all customers use Pharmahelp for this activity. The level of each activity in the three market segments and the total cost incurred for each activity in 2017 is as follows: 1\. Compute the 2017 gross-margin percentage for each of Pharmahelp's three market segments. 2\. Compute the cost driver rates for each of the five activity areas. 3\. Use the activity-based costing information to allocate the \(\$ 301,080\) of "other operating costs" to each of the market segments. Compute the operating income for each market segment. 4\. Comment on the results. What new insights are available with the activity- based costing information?

Marshall Devices manufactures metal products and uses activity-based costing to allocate overhead costs to customer orders for pricing purposes. Many customer orders are won through competitive bidding based on costs. Direct material and direct manufacturing labor costs are traced directly to each order. Marshall's direct manufacturing labor rate is \(\$ 20\) per hour. The company reports the following budgeted yearly overhead costs: Marshall has established four activity cost pools and the following budgeted activity for each cost pool: Some customer orders require more complex designs, while others need simple designs. Marshall estimates that it will do 120 complex designs during a year, which will each take 11.75 hours for a total of 1,410 design-hours. It estimates it will do 180 simple designs, which will each take 6 hours for a total of 1,080 design-hours. Paul Napoli, Marshall's controller, has prepared the following estimates for distribution of the overhead costs across the four activity-cost pools: Order 277100 consists of four different metal products. Three products require a complex design and one requires a simple design. Order 277100 requires \(\$ 4,550\) of direct materials and 80 direct manufacturing labor-hours. 1\. Allocate the overhead costs to each activity cost pool. Calculate the activity rate for each pool. 2\. Determine the cost of Order 277100 . 3\. How does activity-based costing enhance Marshall's ability to price its orders? Suppose Marshall used a simple costing system to allocate all overhead costs to orders on the basis of direct manufacturing labor-hours. How might this have affected Marshall's pricing decision for Order \(227100 ?\) 4\. When designing its activity-based costing system, Marshall uses time- driven activity-based costing system (TDABC) for its design department. What does this approach allow Marshall to do? How would the cost of Order 277100 have been different if Marshall had used the number of customer designs rather than the number of custom design-hours to allocate costs to different customer orders? Which cost driver do you prefer for design support? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.