/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 Describe three alternative ways ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe three alternative ways to dispose of under- or overallocated overhead costs.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Three alternative ways to dispose of under- or overallocated overhead costs are: 1. Write-off to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): The entire amount of under- or overallocated overhead is adjusted in the cost of goods sold, increasing or decreasing the COGS accordingly. 2. Prorate to Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): This method allocates the under- or overallocated overhead to the three inventory accounts based on their existing balances, providing a more accurate distribution of the misallocated overhead. 3. Adjust the allocation rate: This method involves adjusting the overhead allocation rate for the following accounting period, allowing the company to correct the under- or overallocation by making adjustments in the future.

Step by step solution

01

1. Write-off to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

In this method, the entire amount of under- or overallocated overhead is written off to the cost of goods sold. This means that if there is an underallocation, the amount will be added to the cost of goods sold, while an overallocation will result in a decrease in COGS. Keep in mind, this method is generally used when the amount of under- or overallocation is not significant and is assumed to have a minimal impact on the overall financial statements.
02

2. Prorate to Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

This method involves allocating the underallocated or overallocated overhead to the three inventory accounts (Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and COGS) based on their existing balances. Prorating is a more accurate method than writing-off because it distributes the misallocated overhead in proportion to the actual amount in these accounts. To prorate the under- or overallocation, first calculate the misallocated overhead percentage by dividing the misallocated amount by the total of the three inventory accounts. Then, apply this percentage to the balances of each of the three inventory accounts to allocate the misallocated overhead.
03

3. Adjust the allocation rate

The third method is to adjust the overhead allocation rate for the following accounting period. Essentially, this method allows the company to correct the under- or overallocation by making adjustments in the future. This can be done by recalculating the predetermined overhead rate using the actual amount of overhead incurred in the previous period and applying it to the future accounting period. This method is typically used when it is determined that the under- or overallocation is caused by inaccurate estimation of the overhead rate and cannot be corrected using the methods mentioned earlier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
When discussing under- or overallocated overhead costs, one method to manage these discrepancies is by adjusting the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). COGS reflects the total cost directly tied to the production of goods sold by a company. It includes all expenses for producing and selling goods, excluding overheads. However, when overheads are under- or overallocated, they can significantly affect COGS.

In the write-off method, if a business has underallocated overhead, it adds the difference to COGS, effectively increasing it. Conversely, an overallocation results in a decrease in COGS. This adjustment is straightforward and usually applied when the under- or overallocation is minor. Therefore, businesses often opt for this method when discrepancies are small and have minimal impact on overall financial outcomes.
Prorate method
The prorate method offers a more precise approach to handling misallocated overhead costs. Instead of affecting only the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), this method distributes the misallocated overhead among various inventory accounts: Work-in-Process (WIP), Finished Goods, and COGS. It considers how much each of these accounts contributes to the total inventory value.

To apply the prorate method, calculate the misallocated overhead percentage by dividing the misallocated overhead by the combined value of the inventory accounts. Then, distribute this percentage to each account based on its individual balance. By doing this, businesses ensure a fair allocation of costs based on actual inventory values and avoid disproportionately affecting COGS. This method is especially favored when the error impacts the overall fairness and accuracy of financial statements.
inventory accounts
Inventory accounts play a crucial role in cost accounting and overhead allocation. They represent different stages of production and completion within a business and include:
  • Work-in-Process (WIP): Refers to partially finished goods that are still in production.
  • Finished Goods: Completed products ready for sale but not yet sold.
  • Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): Cost directly associated with sold products.

Each account reflects a different stage in the product lifecycle and has related costs. Accurately allocating overhead costs to each of these accounts according to the production and sales process is vital for maintaining fair financial records. Misallocation of overhead affects the net income and financial statements. Therefore, businesses need to ensure correct allocations to reflect true costs and profits.
overhead allocation rate
Overhead allocation rate is the rate used to assign overhead costs to products or services. Companies establish this rate by predicting total overhead costs and expected production activity for the period, such as labor hours or machine hours. An accuracy in setting this rate is crucial, as it influences cost management and financial reporting.

When discrepancies in overhead allocation occur, companies can adjust the overhead allocation rate for future periods. This adjustment helps reflect more realistic cost behavior based on actual historical data rather than assumptions. Adjusting the allocation rate is a strategic decision, typically employed when consistent discrepancies indicate that initial estimations were flawed, thus improving accuracy in cost assessments and financial transparency for subsequent periods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe three major source documents used in job-costing systems.

Give two reasons why most organizations use an annual period rather than a weekly or monthly period to compute budgeted indirect-cost rates.

Atkinson Construction assembles residential houses. It uses a job-costing system with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct labor) and one indirect-cost pool (assembly support). Direct labor-hours is the allocation base for assembly support costs. In December 2016, Atkinson budgets 2017 assembly-support costs to be \(8,800,000 and 2017 direct labor- hours to be 220,000. At the end of 2017 , Atkinson is comparing the costs of several jobs that were started and completed in 2017 . $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Laguna Model } & \text { Mission Model } \\ \hline \text { Construction period } & \text { Feb-June 2017 } & \text { May-0ct 2017 } \\ \text { Direct material costs } & \$ 106,550 & \$ 127,450 \\ \text { Direct labor costs } & \$ 36,250 & \$ 41,130 \\ \text { Direct labor-hours } & 970 & 1,000 \end{array}$$ Direct materials and direct labor are paid for on a contract basis. The costs of each are known when direct materials are used or when direct labor-hours are worked. The 2017 actual assembly-support costs were \)\$ 8,400,000,$ and the actual direct labor-hours were 200,000. 1\. Compute the (a) budgeted indirect-cost rate and (b) actual indirect-cost rate. Why do they differ? 2\. What are the job costs of the Laguna Model and the Mission Model using (a) normal costing and (b) actual costing? 3\. Why might Atkinson Construction prefer normal costing over actual costing?

Service industry, job costing, two direct- and two indirect-cost categories, law firm (continuation of \(4-37\) ). Kidman has just completed a review of its job-costing system. This review included a detailed analysis of how past jobs used the firm's resources and interviews with personnel about what factors drive the level of indirect costs. Management concluded that a system with two direct-cost categories (professional partner labor and professional associate labor) and two indirect-cost categories (general support and secretarial support) would yield more accurate job costs. Budgeted information for 2017 related to the two direct-cost categories is as follows: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Professional Partner Labor } & \text { Professional Associate Labor } \\ \hline \text { Number of professionals } & 5 & 25 \\ \text { Hours of billable time per professional } & 1,500 \text { per year } & 1,500 \text { per year } \\ \text { Total compensation (average per } & \$ 210,000 & \$ 75,000 \\ \text { professional) } & & \end{array}$$ Budgeted information for 2017 relating to the two indirect-cost categories is as follows: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { General Support } & \text { Secretarial Support } \\ \hline \text { Total costs } & \$ 2,025,000 & \$ 450,000 \\ \text { Cost-allocation base } & \text { Professional labor-hours } & \text { Partner labor-hours } \end{array}$$ 1\. Compute the 2017 budgeted direct-cost rates for (a) professional partners and (b) professional associates. 2\. Compute the 2017 budgeted indirect-cost rates for (a) general support and (b) secretarial support. 3\. Compute the budgeted costs for the Richardson and Punch jobs, given the following information: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Richardson, Inc. } & \text { Punch, Inc. } \\ \hline \text { Professional partners } & 48 \text { hours } & 32 \text { hours } \\ \text { Professional associates } & 72 \text { hours } & 128 \text { hours } \end{array}$$ 4\. Comment on the results in requirement 3. Why are the job costs different from those computed in Problem \(4-37 ?\) 5\. Would you recommend Kidman \& Associates use the job-costing system in Problem 4-37 or the jobcosting system in this problem? Explain.

Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. The Solomon Company uses a job-costing system at its Dover, Delaware, plant. The plant has a machining department and a finishing department. Solomon uses normal costing with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department with machine-hours as the allocation base and the finishing department with direct manufacturing labor costs as the allocation base). The 2017 budget for the plant is as follows: 1\. Prepare an overview diagram of Solomon's job-costing system. 2\. What is the budgeted manufacturing overhead rate in the machining department? In the finishing department? 3\. During the month of January, the job-cost record for Job 431 shows the following: Compute the total manufacturing overhead cost allocated to Job 431 4\. Assuming that Job 431 consisted of 400 units of product, what is the cost per unit? 5\. Amounts at the end of 2017 are as follows: Compute the under- or overallocated manufacturing overhead for each department and for the Dover plant as a whole. 6\. Why might Solomon use two different manufacturing overhead cost pools in its job-costing system?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.