/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 Describe three alternative ways ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe three alternative ways to dispose of under- or overallocated overhead costs.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Three alternative ways to dispose of under- or overallocated overhead costs are: 1. Write-off to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): The entire amount of under- or overallocated overhead is adjusted in the cost of goods sold, increasing or decreasing the COGS accordingly. 2. Prorate to Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): This method allocates the under- or overallocated overhead to the three inventory accounts based on their existing balances, providing a more accurate distribution of the misallocated overhead. 3. Adjust the allocation rate: This method involves adjusting the overhead allocation rate for the following accounting period, allowing the company to correct the under- or overallocation by making adjustments in the future.

Step by step solution

01

1. Write-off to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

In this method, the entire amount of under- or overallocated overhead is written off to the cost of goods sold. This means that if there is an underallocation, the amount will be added to the cost of goods sold, while an overallocation will result in a decrease in COGS. Keep in mind, this method is generally used when the amount of under- or overallocation is not significant and is assumed to have a minimal impact on the overall financial statements.
02

2. Prorate to Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

This method involves allocating the underallocated or overallocated overhead to the three inventory accounts (Work-in-Process, Finished Goods, and COGS) based on their existing balances. Prorating is a more accurate method than writing-off because it distributes the misallocated overhead in proportion to the actual amount in these accounts. To prorate the under- or overallocation, first calculate the misallocated overhead percentage by dividing the misallocated amount by the total of the three inventory accounts. Then, apply this percentage to the balances of each of the three inventory accounts to allocate the misallocated overhead.
03

3. Adjust the allocation rate

The third method is to adjust the overhead allocation rate for the following accounting period. Essentially, this method allows the company to correct the under- or overallocation by making adjustments in the future. This can be done by recalculating the predetermined overhead rate using the actual amount of overhead incurred in the previous period and applying it to the future accounting period. This method is typically used when it is determined that the under- or overallocation is caused by inaccurate estimation of the overhead rate and cannot be corrected using the methods mentioned earlier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
When discussing under- or overallocated overhead costs, one method to manage these discrepancies is by adjusting the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). COGS reflects the total cost directly tied to the production of goods sold by a company. It includes all expenses for producing and selling goods, excluding overheads. However, when overheads are under- or overallocated, they can significantly affect COGS.

In the write-off method, if a business has underallocated overhead, it adds the difference to COGS, effectively increasing it. Conversely, an overallocation results in a decrease in COGS. This adjustment is straightforward and usually applied when the under- or overallocation is minor. Therefore, businesses often opt for this method when discrepancies are small and have minimal impact on overall financial outcomes.
Prorate method
The prorate method offers a more precise approach to handling misallocated overhead costs. Instead of affecting only the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), this method distributes the misallocated overhead among various inventory accounts: Work-in-Process (WIP), Finished Goods, and COGS. It considers how much each of these accounts contributes to the total inventory value.

To apply the prorate method, calculate the misallocated overhead percentage by dividing the misallocated overhead by the combined value of the inventory accounts. Then, distribute this percentage to each account based on its individual balance. By doing this, businesses ensure a fair allocation of costs based on actual inventory values and avoid disproportionately affecting COGS. This method is especially favored when the error impacts the overall fairness and accuracy of financial statements.
inventory accounts
Inventory accounts play a crucial role in cost accounting and overhead allocation. They represent different stages of production and completion within a business and include:
  • Work-in-Process (WIP): Refers to partially finished goods that are still in production.
  • Finished Goods: Completed products ready for sale but not yet sold.
  • Cost of Goods Sold (COGS): Cost directly associated with sold products.

Each account reflects a different stage in the product lifecycle and has related costs. Accurately allocating overhead costs to each of these accounts according to the production and sales process is vital for maintaining fair financial records. Misallocation of overhead affects the net income and financial statements. Therefore, businesses need to ensure correct allocations to reflect true costs and profits.
overhead allocation rate
Overhead allocation rate is the rate used to assign overhead costs to products or services. Companies establish this rate by predicting total overhead costs and expected production activity for the period, such as labor hours or machine hours. An accuracy in setting this rate is crucial, as it influences cost management and financial reporting.

When discrepancies in overhead allocation occur, companies can adjust the overhead allocation rate for future periods. This adjustment helps reflect more realistic cost behavior based on actual historical data rather than assumptions. Adjusting the allocation rate is a strategic decision, typically employed when consistent discrepancies indicate that initial estimations were flawed, thus improving accuracy in cost assessments and financial transparency for subsequent periods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Visual Company produces gadgets for the coveted small appliance market. The following data reflect activity for the year 2017: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { January 1, 2017 } & \text { December 31, 2017 } \\ \hline \text { Direct materials } & \$ 9,400 & \$ 18,000 \\ \text { Work in process } & 6,500 & 26,000 \\ \text { Finished goods } & 60,000 & 31,000 \end{array}$$ Visual Co. uses a normal-costing system and allocates overhead to work in process at a rate of \(\$ 3.10\) per direct manufacturing labor dollar. Indirect materials are insignificant so there is no inventory account for indirect materials. 1\. Prepare journal entries to record the transactions for 2017 including an entry to close out over-or underallocated overhead to cost of goods sold. For each journal entry indicate the source document that would be used to authorize each entry. Also note which subsidiary ledger, if any, should be referenced as backup for the entry. 2\. Post the journal entrifies to T-accounts for all of the inventories, Cost of Goods Sold, the Manutacturing Overhead Control Account, and the Manufacturing Overhead Allocated Account.

Under Stanford Corporation's job costing system, manufacturing overhead is applied to work in process using a predetermined annual overhead rate. During November, Year 1 , Stanford's transactions included the following: Direct materials issued to production Indirect materials issued to production Manufacturing overhead incurred Manufacturing overhead applied Direct manufacturing labor costs \(\$ 180,000\) 16,000 250,000 226,000 214,000 Stanford had neither beginning nor ending work-in-process inventory. What was the cost of jobs completed and transferred to finished goods in November \(20 \times 1 ?\) 1\. \(\$ 604,000\) 2\. \(\$ 644,000\) 3\. \(\$ 620,000\) 4\. \(\$ 660,000\)

Overview of general ledger relationships. Estevez Company uses normal costing in its job-costing system. The company produces kitchen cabinets. The beginning balances (December 1 ) and ending balances (as of December 30 ) in their inventory accounts are as follows: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Beginning Balance 12/1 } & \text { Ending Balance 12/30 } \\ \hline \text { Materials Control } & \$ 4,200 & \$ 17,000 \\ \text { Work-in-Process Control } & 13,400 & 18,000 \\ \text { Manufacturing Department 0verhead Control } & \- & 188,000 \\ \text { Finished Goods Control } & 8,800 & 38,800 \end{array}$$ a. Direct materials purchased during December were \(\$ 132,600\). b. cost of goods manufactured for December was \(\$ 468,000\). c. No direct materials were returned to suppliers. d. No units were started or completed on December 31 and no direct materials were requisitioned on December 31 e. The manufacturing labor costs for the December 31 working day: direct manufacturing labor, \(\$ 8,600\), and indirect manufacturing labor, \(\$ 2,800\) f. Manufacturing overhead has been allocated at \(110 \%\) of direct manufacturing labor costs through December 31 1\. Prepare journal entries for the December 31 payroll. 2\. Use T-accounts to compute the following: a. The total amount of materials requisitioned into work in process during December b. The total amount of direct manufacturing labor recorded in work in process during December (Hint. You have to solve requirements \(2 b\) and \(2 c\) simultaneously c. The total amount of manufacturing overhead recorded in work in process during December d. Ending balance in work in process, December 31 e. cost of goods sold for December before adjustments for under- or overallocated manufacturing overhead 3\. Prepare closing journal entries related to manufacturing overhead. Assume that all under- or overallocated manufacturing overhead is closed directly to cost of Goods Sold.

Dakota Products uses a job-costing system with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and one manufacturing overhead cost pool. Dakota allocates manufacturing overhead costs using direct manufacturing labor costs. Dakota provides the following information: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Budget for 2017 } & \text { Actual Results for 2017 } \\ \hline \text { Direct material costs } & \$ 2,250,000 & \$ 2,150,000 \\ \text { Direct manufacturing labor costs } & 1,700,000 & 1,650,000 \\ \text { Manufacturing overhead costs } & 3,060,000 & 3,217,500 \end{array}$$ 1\. Compute the actual and budgeted manufacturing overhead rates for 2017 . 2\. During March, the job-cost record for Job 626 contained the following information: Direct materials used Direct manufacturing labor costs \(\$ 55,000\) \(\$ 45,000\) Compute the cost of Job 626 using (a) actual costing and (b) normal costing. 3\. At the end of 2017 , compute the under-or overallocated manufacturing overhead under normal costing. Why is there no under- or overallocated manufacturing overhead under actual costing? 4\. Why might managers at Dakota Products prefer to use normal costing?

Describe two ways in which a house-construction company may use job-cost information.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.