/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Year 1 financial data for the AB... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Year 1 financial data for the ABC Company is as follows: Sales\(\quad$$\$ 5,000,000\) Direct materials\(\quad\)850,000 Direct manufacturing labor\(\quad\)1,700,000 Variable manufacturing overhead\(\quad\)400,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead\(\quad\)750,000 Variable \(\mathrm{SG} \& \mathrm{A}$$\quad\)150,000 Fixed \(\mathrm{SG} \& \mathrm{A}$$\quad\)250,000 Under the absorption method, Year 1 cost of Goods sold will be: a. \(\$ 2,550,000\) b. \(\$ 2,950,000\) c. \(\$ 3,100,000\) d. \(\$ 3,700,000\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The cost of goods sold (COGS) for the ABC company under the Absorption Costing method is (d) $3,700,000.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the costs included in COGS under the absorption method

In the absorption costing method, all manufacturing costs i.e., direct materials, direct labor, variable manufacturing overhead, and fixed manufacturing overhead are included in the cost of goods sold (COGS). Selling and administration expenses (both fixed and variable) are not included in the COGS but are expensed as incurred.
02

Identify the costs given

From the given data we know the following: - Direct materials = $850,000 - Direct manufacturing labor = $1,700,000 - Variable manufacturing overhead = $400,000 - Fixed manufacturing overhead = $750,000 Expenses not included in COGS under the absorption method are: - Variable SGA = $150,000 - Fixed SGA = $250,000
03

Calculate the cost of goods sold

We add up all the costs that go into the COGS under the absorption costing method: COGS = Direct materials + Direct manufacturing labor + Variable manufacturing overhead + Fixed manufacturing overhead Hence: COGS = \(850,000 + \)1,700,000 + \(400,000 + \)750,000 = $3,700,000. Therefore, from options a, b, c, and d, the cost of goods sold (COGS) for the ABC company under the Absorption Costing method is Answer (d) $3,700,000.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
Understanding the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) is fundamental for students learning about accounting and business practices. COGS represents the direct expenses attributable to the production of the goods sold by a company. This includes the cost of the materials and labor directly used to create the product, as well as overhead costs associated with manufacturing.

In the context of the absorption costing method, COGS is particularly important because it encompasses not just the variable costs of production, such as direct materials and labor, but also a portion of fixed overhead costs. This can result in a higher COGS compared to variable costing methods, where only variable manufacturing costs are included. As such, calculating the COGS correctly under absorption costing requires the inclusion of all manufacturing costs, which provides a more comprehensive picture of the actual cost of producing goods sold during a period.
Manufacturing Overhead
Manufacturing overhead, another key element in the absorption costing method, refers to all the indirect costs associated with producing goods. These are costs that cannot be directly traced to specific units of product, like direct materials or labor can be.

Under manufacturing overhead, you have both variable and fixed components. Variable overheads change with the level of production output, such as the cost of utilities or machine maintenance. Fixed overheads remain constant regardless of the production volume, examples being salaries of manufacturing supervisors and rent for factory premises. When calculating COGS under absorption costing, it's crucial to spread these overhead costs across the units produced, which ensures that each product reflects a share of the indirect costs.
Direct Materials
Direct materials are the raw materials that are directly incorporated into a finished product. They can easily be traced and are clearly identifiable as they are converted into finished goods. For instance, lumber used to make furniture or flour used in baking bread are considered direct materials.

Since direct materials are a significant component of the COGS, understanding their impact on product costing is essential. Under the absorption costing method, the cost of direct materials is fully allocated to the product during the period they are used, contributing to the overall value of the inventory and the eventual cost once the goods are sold.
Direct Manufacturing Labor
Direct manufacturing labor costs include wages and other benefits related to employees who are actively engaged in the manufacturing process. These workers' contributions can be directly linked to specific units of product, such as assembly line workers or individuals operating machines that produce goods.

In absorption costing, these labor costs are part of the COGS because they are integral to converting materials into finished goods. Accurately accounting for direct labor is fundamental to determining the true cost of production and ensuring accurate financial reporting and analysis of a company's operational efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why unit costs must often be interpreted with caution.

Computing and interpreting manufacturing unit costs. Minnesota Office Products (MOP) produces three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber plant: Supreme, Deluxe, and Regular. Each product has its own dedicated production line at the plant. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct manufacturing labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs of the plant in July 2017 are \(\$ 150\) million (\$15 million of which are fixed). This total amount is allocated to each product line on the basis of the direct manufacturing labor costs of each line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2017 are as follows: $$\begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Supreme } & \text { Deluxe } & \text { Regular } \\ \hline \text { Direct material costs } & \$ 89 & \$ 57 & \$ 60 \\ \text { Direct manufacturing labor costs } & \$ 16 & \$ 26 & \$ 8 \\ \text { Manufacturing overhead costs } & \$ 48 & \$ 78 & \$ 24 \\ \text { Units produced } & 125 & 150 & 140 \end{array}$$ 1\. Compute the manufacturing cost per unit for each product produced in July 2017 . 2\. Suppose that, in August 2017 , production was 150 million units of Supreme, 190 million units of Deluxe, and 220 million units of Regular. Why might the July 2017 information on manufacturing cost per unit be misleading when predicting total manufacturing costs in August \(2017 ?\)

Distinguish between inventoriable costs and period costs.

The following information was extracted from the accounting records of Roosevelt Manufacturing Company: $$\begin{array}{lr} \text { Direct materials purchased } & 80,000 \\ \text { Direct materials used } & 76,000 \\ \text { Direct manufacturing labor costs } & 10,000 \\ \text { Indirect manufacturing labor costs } & 12,000 \\ \text { Sales salaries } & 14,000 \\ \text { 0ther plant expenses } & 22,000 \\ \text { Selling and administrative expenses } & 20,000 \end{array}$$ What was the cost of goods manufactured? 1\. \(\$ 124,000\) 2\. \(\$ 120,000\) 3\. \(\$ 154,000\) 4\. \(\$ 170,000\)

Cost classification; ethics. Paul Howard, the new plant manager of Garden Scapes Manufacturing Plant Number 7, has just reviewed a draft of his year-end financial statements. Howard receives a year-end bonus of \(11.5 \%\) of the plant's operating income before tax. The year-end income statement provided by the plant's controller was disappointing to say the least. After reviewing the numbers, Howard demanded that his controller go back and "work the numbers" again. Howard insisted that if he didn't see a better operat ing income number the next time around he would be forced to look for a new controller. Garden Scapes Manufacturing classifies all costs directly related to the manufacturing of its product as product costs. These costs are inventoried and later expensed as costs of goods sold when the productis sold. All other expenses, including finished-goods warehousing costs of \(\$ 3,64,000,\) are classified as period expenses. Howard had suggested that warehousing costs be included as product costs because they are "definitely related to our product." The company produced 260,000 units during the period and sold 240,000 units. As the controller reworked the numbers, he discovered that if he included warehousing costs as product costs, he could improve operating income by \(\$ 280,000\). He was also sure these new numbers would make Howard happy. 1\. Show numerically how operating income would improve by \(\$ 280,000\) just by classifying the preceding costs as product costs instead of period expenses. 2\. Is Howard correct in his justification that these costs are "definitely related to our product"? 3\. By how much will Howard profit personally if the controller makes the adjustments in requirement 1? 4\. What should the plant controller do?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.