/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Write the numbers of the stateme... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 21

Write the numbers of the statements on your paper and mark each "true," "false," or "not certain." Where you feel that someone might not agree with you, briefly explain the basis for your answer. Dwarves are not very large because they will fit inside sacks.

Short Answer

Expert verified
True; dwarves aren't large because they fit in sacks.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Statement

The statement claims that dwarves are not very large because they can fit inside sacks. To analyze this, we need to consider the logical structure: if something can fit inside a sack, does it imply it is not very large?
02

Evaluate the Conditional

The statement's reasoning depends on the condition that being able to fit inside sacks necessarily means something is not very large. This assumption seems reasonable for common understanding, as sacks are typically quite small compared to "very large" objects.
03

Consider the Generality

Consider whether this reasoning applies universally. Most people would agree that fitting inside a sack implies relatively small size. However, if we had no context on dwarves or sacks, the claim might be uncertain as both terms are somewhat subjective without specification.
04

Provide a Justification

The statement hinges on the assumption that the size of a sack is smaller than that of what would be considered 'large.' Given common understanding, we justify marking the statement as "true" based on this reasoning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Statements
A conditional statement is a foundational concept in logical reasoning. It typically has the form "If P, then Q," where P is the premise and Q is the conclusion.
In the example provided in the exercise, the conditional statement is: "If something can fit inside sacks, then it is not very large."
This sentence links fitting inside a sack (P) to not being very large (Q). The logic suggests that the first part (P) implies the second part (Q), creating a cause-and-effect relationship.
  • Understanding Conditional Relationships: This is crucial for analyzing statements. In many cases, like with our sack example, understanding the common properties鈥攍ike size鈥攈elps verify or challenge logical connections.
  • Exploring Counterexamples: If you find a situation where P is true, but Q is false, the conditional statement might fail. For our example, if an object that fits in a sack was actually very large due to some extraordinary context (like an intergalactic sack meant for planets), the conclusion might falter.
Grasping these elements enhances critical thinking skills, allowing for deeper analysis of statements.
Truth Value Assessment
The next important step in logical reasoning is assessing the truth value of a given statement. This involves determining whether a statement is "true," "false," or "not certain."
In our case, the statement that dwarves are not large because they fit inside sacks is evaluated based on common context.
The statement can be marked as "true" given typical understanding, yet a deeper dive shows that:
  • Context Matters: Words like "large" and tools like "sacks" are relative concepts, often requiring common frames of reference for assessment.
  • Importance of Evidence: To affirm the statement is "true," it helps to compare to known sizes: a dwarf fitting in a sack aligns with the idea of being not very large.
Further considerations might lead one to conclude differently based on rare scenarios or alternative sack designs, which is why this step is vital to reasoning.
Evaluating Assumptions
It鈥檚 essential to evaluate the assumptions behind statements to determine their validity. Assumptions fill in the gaps where explicit information is missing.
In this reasoning exercise, several assumptions underlie the statement:
"Dwarves fitting inside a sack implies they are not very large."
  • Identifying Assumptions: Recognize that this statement assumes the size of the sack is universally understood to be small, and that most definitions of "dwarves" agree to this size relation.
  • Testing Assumptions: Ask what happens if assumptions change: What if sacks were redefined? This tests how reliant the conclusion is on specific contexts.
Evaluating these assumptions enables more robust conclusions, encouraging a broader critical outlook on seemingly straightforward statements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Copy the following statements, writing them in "if-then" form and rearranging them in logical order. NASA would send some mice on a lunar mission if they were eager astronauts. If mice were sent on a lunar mission, the eyes of the entire world would be watching them on television. If the moon were made of green cheese, mice would make eager astronauts. It would be one giant peep for mouse kind if the eyes of the entire world were watching them on television.

Fact \(1 .\) If Miss Scarlet did it, she used a revolver. Fact \(2 .\) No bullets were fired. Fact \(3 .\) If Colonel Mustard didn't do it, then Miss Scarlet did it. Fact \(4 .\) If a revolver was used, a bullet was fired. Consider the following statements: Statement 1. If someone is a felon, he cannot vote. Statement 2. A person is a felon iff he has committed a serious crime. Statement 3. Dillinger has committed a serious crime. Write the two conditional statements that are equivalent to it.

The following statements appear on the customer agreement for obtaining a credit card. Statement 1. A transaction finance charge is a charge made if a new advance is added to your account. Statement \(2 .\) If you go over your credit limit, you will be charged a fee. Statement 3. A supercheck is a check designed for use with your credit card account. Statement 4. If you are charged a fee, the fee will be added to your new balance. Statement \(5 .\) If your card is lost or stolen, you agree to report it immediately. What words do they define?

If you forgot your pencil, you may borrow one of mine. You forgot your pencil. Therefore, you may borrow a pencil from me.

Write the numbers of the statements on your paper and mark each "true," "false," or "not certain." Where you feel that someone might not agree with you, briefly explain the basis for your answer. Major Moberly tried to kill Muggs.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.