/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 In \(2001,\) the mean household ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In \(2001,\) the mean household expenditure for energy was \(\$ 1493,\) according to data obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. An economist wanted to know whether this amount has changed significantly from its 2001 level. In a random sample of 35 households, he found the mean expenditure (in 2001 dollars) for energy during the most recent year to be \(\$ 1618\), with standard deviation \(\$ 321 .\) (a) Do you believe that the mean expenditure has changed significantly from the 2001 level at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval about the mean energy expenditure. What does the interval imply?

Short Answer

Expert verified
At the 0.05 significance level, the mean expenditure has changed significantly from 2001. The 95% confidence interval for mean expenditure is (1507.86, 1728.14).

Step by step solution

01

- Define the Hypotheses

To address part (a), set up the null and alternative hypotheses.Null hypothesis, \, H_0: \(\mu = 1493\)Alternative hypothesis, \, H_A: \(\mu e 1493\)
02

- Collect the Sample Data

From the problem, we have the following sample data:Sample mean \(\bar{x} = 1618\)Population mean \(\mu = 1493\)Sample standard deviation \(s = 321\)Sample size \(n = 35\)
03

- Calculate the Test Statistic

Use the t-test statistic formula for a sample:\[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s / \sqrt{n}} \]Substitute the given values:\[ t = \frac{1618 - 1493}{321 / \sqrt{35}} \]Calculate the t-value:\[ t \approx 2.112 \]
04

- Determine the Critical Value and Decision Rule

Find the critical t-value for a two-tailed test at the \(\alpha = 0.05\) significance level with \(n-1 = 34\) degrees of freedom. Using a t-distribution table, the critical value is approximately \(\pm 2.032\). If the calculated t-value falls outside the range [-2.032, 2.032], reject the null hypothesis.
05

- Compare the Test Statistic and Make a Decision

The calculated t-value is approximately 2.112.Since 2.112 exceeds 2.032, reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, at the \(\alpha = 0.05\) level, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean expenditure has changed significantly from 2001.
06

- Construct the 95% Confidence Interval

To address part (b), calculate the 95% confidence interval using the sample mean and standard error.The confidence interval formula is:\[\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, df} \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \]Substitute the given values:\[ 1618 \pm 2.032 \cdot \frac{321}{\sqrt{35}} \]Calculate the margin of error:\[ 2.032 \cdot \frac{321}{\sqrt{35}} \approx 110.14 \]Construct the interval:\[ 1618 \pm 110.14 \rightarrow (1507.86, 1728.14) \]
07

- Interpret the Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval for the mean energy expenditure is (1507.86, 1728.14). This interval does not include 1493, indicating that it is likely that the mean expenditure is different from the 2001 expenditure level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals help us estimate an unknown population parameter by providing a range of plausible values based on sample data. For instance, in our problem, we constructed a 95% confidence interval to estimate the mean energy expenditure. This interval is calculated using the formula: \[\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, df} \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \] where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, \(n\) is the sample size, and \(t_{\alpha/2, df}\) is the critical t-value for the chosen confidence level with appropriate degrees of freedom (\(df\)).
For our example, the 95% confidence interval is (1507.86, 1728.14). This means we are 95% confident that the true mean expenditure lies within this interval. The interpretation of the interval impacts our decision-making by showing that 1493 is not within this range, suggesting a significant change in expenditures.
T-Test
A t-test is a statistical test used to compare the mean of a sample to a known value or another sample's mean. This test helps determine if there is a significant difference between the two means. In our problem, we used a t-test to see if the mean energy expenditure in a recent year is significantly different from that in 2001.
The test statistic for a one-sample t-test is calculated as: \[\frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s / \sqrt{n}} \] where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\text{mu}\) is the population mean, \(\text{s}\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. In our case, we found the t-value to be approximately 2.112, which we compared to the critical t-value (approximately \(\pm 2.032\) for \(df = 34\) at \(\text{alpha} = 0.05\)).
Since 2.112 is greater than 2.032, we rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there is a significant change in mean expenditure.
Level of Significance
The level of significance, denoted \(\alpha\), is the threshold for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly set at 0.05, it represents a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none (Type I error).
In hypothesis testing, we compare the p-value or test statistic to the level of significance to determine the result. For our problem, we set \(\alpha = 0.05\) and compared the calculated t-value (2.112) to the critical value (2.032).
If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. In our case, since 2.112 > 2.032, we concluded that the mean expenditure has changed significantly. This use of \(\alpha\) ensures our results are statistically significant and not due to random chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A poll conducted by CNN, USA Today, and Gallup reported the following results: "According to the most recent CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted June 28-July 1, a majority of Americans (52\%) approve of the job Bush is doing as president." The poll results were obtained by conducting simple random sample of 1014 adults aged 18 years old or older, with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points. State what is wrong with the conclusions presented by the pollsters.

(a) determine the null and alternative hypotheses, (b) explain what it would mean to make a Type I error, and (c) explain what it would mean to make a Type II error. According to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, the mean monthly cell phone bill was \(\$ 49.91\) in \(2003 .\) A researcher suspects that the mean monthly cell phone bill is different today.

A nutritionist believes that children under the age of 10 years are consuming more than the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recommended daily allowance of sodium, which is \(2400 \mathrm{mg}\). She obtains a random sample of 75 children under the age of 10 and measures their daily consumption of sodium. The mean amount of sodium consumed was determined to be \(2993 \mathrm{mg},\) with a standard deviation of 1489 mg. Is there significant evidence to conclude that children under the age of 10 years are consuming too much sodium? Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

A null and alternative hypothesis is given. Determine whether the hypothesis test is left-tailed, right-tailed, or two tailed. What parameter is being tested? $$\begin{aligned}&H_{0}: \mu=120\\\&H_{1}: \mu<120\end{aligned}$$

Farm Size In \(1990,\) the average farm size in Kansas was 694 acres, according to data obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A researcher claims that farm sizes are larger now due to consolidation of farms. She obtains a random sample of 40 farms and determines the mean size to be 731 acres. Assume that \(\sigma=212\) acres. Test the researcher's claim at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.