/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 175 A study was performed among pati... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A study was performed among patients with piriformissyndrome (PS), a pelvic condition that involves malfunction of the piriformis muscle (a deep buttock muscle),which often causes lumbar and buttock pain with sciatica (pain radiating down the leg). A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed where patients were injected with one of three substances: Group 1: TL group received an injection of a combination of triamcinolone and lidocaine. Group 2: Placebo group received a placebo injection. Group 3: Botox group received a Botox injection. We will focus on a comparison of group 3 vs. group 2 for this problem. Patients were asked to come back at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, etc., up to 17 months. At each visit the patients rated their percentage of improvement of pain vs. baseline on a visual analog scale with a maximum of \(100 \%\) of improvement (indicated by 100 ). The results at the 3-month follow-up visit were as follows: 8.175 What test can be performed to compare the means of the two groups?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a two-sample t-test to compare the means.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the test groups

We need to compare the outcomes of two groups in the study. Specifically, we focus on Group 3 (Botox) and Group 2 (Placebo). Both groups have reported their percentage improvement using a visual analog scale at the 3-month follow-up.
02

Determine the nature of the data

The improvement ratings are continuous data, as they represent percentages on a scale from 0 to 100. Additionally, each participant belongs to a different independent group (either Group 2 or Group 3).
03

Identify the appropriate statistical test

To compare the means of two independent groups with continuous data, we apply a two-sample t-test (also called an independent samples t-test). This test determines whether there is a statistically significant difference between the means of the two groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Piriformis Syndrome
Piriformis Syndrome is a condition that affects the piriformis muscle, located deep in the buttock region. This muscle plays a crucial role in helping the hip rotate during body movements, such as walking or turning. When the piriformis muscle becomes irritated or tight, it can press against the sciatic nerve. This pressure causes a variety of symptoms, including lumbar and buttock pain, often resembling sciatica with pain radiating down the leg. Sciatica specifically refers to the pain along the sciatic nerve, which extends from the lower back to the hips and down each leg.

People with Piriformis Syndrome often experience discomfort while sitting, standing for long periods, or engaging in activities that involve hip rotation. The condition can be challenging to diagnose as its symptoms overlap with other ailments. It can sometimes mimic a herniated disc in the spine or other common back issues.

In managing Piriformis Syndrome, treatments involve physical therapy, medications, stretching exercises, and in some cases, injections into the affected area to relieve pain and inflammation. The study in question uses injections to investigate the effectiveness of different treatments on pain improvement. Understanding Piriformis Syndrome is essential when evaluating the outcomes of clinical interventions, such as in this study.
Independent Samples t-test
The Independent Samples t-test, also known as a two-sample t-test, is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means of two independent groups. This test is particularly useful when comparing two distinct groups, such as patients receiving different treatments in a clinical trial.

For a t-test, the data involved must be continuous, which means the data can take any value within a range, such as percentages or scores. In the given clinical trial, improvement ratings reported by the patients are continuous data collected on a visual analog scale from 0% to 100%.
  • Group 2: Placebo - receives an injection with no active ingredient.
  • Group 3: Botox - receives an injection containing Botox.
The test determines if the mean improvement in pain is statistically different between these groups at the 3-month follow-up.

To perform this test:
  • Identify your test groups: For this exercise, these are Group 2 and Group 3.
  • Check data assumptions: Ensure data is continuous and normally distributed.
  • Execute the t-test: Analyze if observed mean differences are statistically significant.
The outcome tells us if Botox provides significantly more pain relief compared to a placebo treatment.
Randomized Double-Blind Study
A Randomized Double-Blind Study is a highly respected research design in clinical trials, used to eliminate bias and ensure the reliability of the results. Here's why it's so effective:

In a randomized study, participants are randomly assigned to different groups. This random allocation reduces bias and ensures that differences in outcomes can be attributed to the treatment effect rather than pre-existing differences between individuals.
  • Randomization: Equally distributes characteristics among groups, like age or disease severity, which might affect results.
In a double-blind study, neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment the participants are receiving. This lack of awareness prevents bias in treatment administration and outcome assessment. For instance, in the study of Piriformis Syndrome involving different injections (Botox, TL combination, Placebo), both the patient and researcher remain unaware of which specific substance is injected.
  • Double-blinding: Eliminates placebo effect and observer bias, creating more credible results.
Such study designs are the gold standard as they improve the validity and reliability of the findings. By implementing randomization and blinding, researchers can confidently attribute any changes in the patients' condition to the treatments under investigation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Diabetes Prevention Study was a randomized study conducted in Finland in which middle-aged participants (mean age 55 years) with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were enrolled [17]. Study participants, who had high-normal glucose levels, were randomized to either an intervention group or a control group. People in the intervention group were encouraged to (a) reduce weight, (b) reduce fat intake, (c) increase fiber intake, and (d) increase hours per week of exercise. They also underwent intensive individuallevel counseling to reduce risk-factor levels. People in the control group received pamphlets with general information concerning diet and exercise but did not receive individual counseling. Data regarding changes in weight after 1 year are shown in Table What test can be used to assess mean changes in weight in the intervention group?

What test can be used to compare mean change in weight between the intervention and control groups?

Left ventricular mass (LVM) is an important risk factor for subsequent cardiovascular disease. A study is proposed to assess the relationship between childhood blood-pressure levels and LVM in children as determined from echocardiograms. The goal is to stratify children into a normal bp group ( \(<\) 80th percentile for their age, gender, and height) and an elevated bp group ( \(\geq\) 90th percentile for their age, gender, and height) and compare the change in LVM between the two groups. Before this can be done, one needs to demonstrate that LVM actually changes in children over a 4-year period. To help plan the main study, a pilot study is conducted where echocardiograms are obtained from 10 random children from the Bogalusa Heart Study at baseline and after four years of follow-up (Urbina et al., Personal Communication). The data are given in Table 8.27. What test can be used to assess if there is a change in mean LVM over four years?

A study compared mean electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude of patients with different genetic types of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a genetic eye disease that often results in blindness. The results shown in Table 8.24 were obtained for In (ERG amplitude) among patients \(18-29\) years of age. $$\begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Genetic type } & \text { Mean } \pm \mathrm{sd} & n \\ \hline \text { Dominant } & 0.85 \pm 0.18 & 62 \\ \text { Recessive } & 0.38 \pm 0.21 & 35 \\ \text { X-linked } & -0.09 \pm 0.21 & 28 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ What is the standard error of In(ERG amplitude) among patients with dominant RP? How does it differ from the standard deviation in the table?

A possible important environmental determinant of lung function in children is the amount of cigarette smoking in the home. Suppose this question is studied by selecting two groups: Group 1 consists of 23 nonsmoking children 5-9 years of age, both of whose parents smoke, who have a mean forced expiratory volume (FEV) of 2.1 L and a standard deviation of \(0.7 \mathrm{L} ;\) group 2 consists of 20 nonsmoking children of comparable age, neither of whose parents smoke, who have a mean FEV of \(2.3 \mathrm{L}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.4 \mathrm{L}\). What is the appropriate test procedure for the hypotheses in Problem 8.31?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.