/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 98 Medical errors are common in hos... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Medical errors are common in hospitals throughout the world. One possible causal factor is the long work hours of hospital personnel. In a pilot study investigating this issue, medical residents were encouraged to sleep \(6-8\) hours per night for a 3 -week period instead of their usual irregular sleep schedule. The researchers expected, given previous data, that there would be one medical error per resident per day on their usual irregular sleep schedule. Suppose two residents participate in the program (each for 3 weeks), and chart review finds a total of 20 medical errors made by the two residents combined. What test can be used to test the hypothesis that an increase in amount of sleep will change the number of medical errors per day?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a Poisson test to check if increased sleep affects medical errors.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the change in sleep does not affect the number of medical errors, so the error rate remains one per day per resident. The alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that the increase in sleep will decrease the number of medical errors per day.
02

Calculate the Expected Errors

Calculate the expected number of errors under the null hypothesis over the 3-week period. Each resident works 21 days in 3 weeks, and with an error rate of one per day, this gives an expected 42 errors for the two residents combined (21 days per resident * 2 residents * 1 error per day).
03

Choose the Statistical Test

Since we are comparing observed errors (20) with expected errors (42) and data may not be normally distributed, a Poisson test, suitable for count data, is appropriate to test if the number of errors significantly deviates from what's expected based on the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical procedure used to make decisions about a population parameter based on sample data. In our medical error study, we're trying to determine if a change in sleep patterns affects the error rate. Here's how we set this up:
  • **Null Hypothesis (H0)**: The null hypothesis posits that there is no effect or difference. In this case, it states that increasing sleep does not alter the frequency of medical errors.
  • **Alternative Hypothesis (H1)**: The alternative hypothesis suggests that there is an effect or difference. Here, it proposes that more sleep leads to fewer errors.
Once these hypotheses are defined, data is collected, and statistical tests are used to interpret the results. If data significantly supports the alternative hypothesis, we might reject the null hypothesis.
Poisson Distribution
The Poisson distribution is a probability distribution that describes the number of events happening within a fixed interval of time or space. It's particularly useful for modeling count data or rare events. In the context of the medical error study, here's how it applies:
  • **Count Data**: The medical errors are count data since they're being tallied over a period.
  • **Assumptions**: Poisson assumes these events happen independently and within a given time frame, suitable since each day is an independent unit for the study.
  • **Poisson Test**: This statistical test measures if the observed count (20 errors) is significantly different from the expected count (42 errors) under the null hypothesis.
The analysis involves calculating probabilities and comparing them to expected outcomes to see if the deviation from expectations could be due to random chance.
Error Rate Analysis
Error rate analysis helps in understanding and quantifying the frequency and impact of errors within a given system. It is crucial for quality control and improvement measures in various fields, including healthcare. Here's how it fits into our discussion:
  • **Baseline Error Rate**: In the study, a baseline or expected rate of 1 error per day per resident was established under existing conditions.
  • **Observed Error Rate**: After intervention, 20 errors were observed over the study period, which is lower than expected based on the baseline rate (42 errors).
  • **Statistical Testing**: By using statistical tools like a Poisson test, we determine if this reduction in error rate is statistically significant or not.
Being aware of such error rates and analyses helps draw insights into process improvements, potentially leading to reduced errors and enhanced outcomes in the healthcare setting.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Osteoporosis is an important cause of morbidity in middle-aged and elderly women. Several drugs are currently used to prevent fractures in postmenopausal women. Suppose the incidence rate of fractures over a 4 -year period is known to be \(5 \%\) among untreated postmenopausal women with no previous fractures. A pilot study conducted among 100 women without previous fractures aims to determine whether a new drug can prevent fractures. It is found that two of the women have developed fractures over a 4-year period. Suppose the new drug is hypothesized to yield a fracture rate of \(2.5 \%\) over a 4 -year period. How many subjects need to be studied to have an \(80 \%\) chance of detecting a significant difference between the incidence rate of fractures in treated women and the incidence rate of fractures in untreated women (assumed to be \(5 \%\) from Problem 7.105 )?

An experiment was performed to assess the efficacy of an eye drop in preventing "dry eye." A principal objective measure used to assess efficacy is the tear breakup time (TBUT), which is reduced in people with dry eye and which the researchers hope will be increased after use of the eye drop. In the actual study, participants will be randomized to either active drug or placebo, based on a fairly large sample size. However, a pilot study was first performed based on 14 participants. Under protocol \(A\), the participants had their TBUT measured at baseline and were then instructed to not blink their eyes for 3 seconds, after which time the placebo eye drop was instilled. The TBUT was measured again immediately after instillation as well as at \(5,10,\) and 15 minutes postinstillation, during which time the study participants were in a controlled-chamber environment with low humidity to exacerbate symptoms of dry eye. On 2 other days participants received protocols \(B\) and \(C\). Protocol \(B\) was identical to protocol \(A\) except that participants were told not to blink for 6 seconds prior to drop instillation. Protocol \(\mathrm{C}\) was identical to protocol A except that participants were told not to blink their eyes for 10 seconds prior to drop instillation. Note that the same participants were used for each protocol and that for each protocol data are available for each of two eyes. Also, for each eye, two replicate measurements were provided. The data are available in TEAR.DAT with documentation in TEAR.DOC at www.cengagebrain.com. For each protocol, TBUT (in seconds) was measured (1) at baseline (before drop instillation), (2) immediately after drop instillation, (3) 5 minutes after instillation, (4) 10 minutes after instillation, and (5) 15 minutes after instillation. The standard protocol used in previous clinical studies of TBUT is a 6 -second nonblink interval (protocol B). All the following questions concern protocol B data. For this purpose, average TBUT over two replicates and over both eyes to find a summary value for each time period for each participant. Does the effect of the placebo eye drop change over time after drop instillation? (Hint: Compare mean TBUT at \(5,10,\) and 15 minutes postinstillation vs. mean \(\mathrm{TBUT}\) immediately after drop instillation.)

Treatment with statins can reduce the risk of a major cardiovascular event in people with specified risk factors. During about 2 years of follow-up in the JUPITER trial (P. M. Ridker et al. \([8]), 142\) of 8901 subjects treated with a statin had a major cardiovascular event. Suppose the expected 2-year risk of a major cardiovascular event in similar but untreated people is 0.028 . Test whether the 2 -year risk in those treated with a statin is significantly different from this expected risk at the \(5 \%\) level. Make sure to state your null and alternative hypotheses and specify your conclusion.

A study was performed among patients with glaucoma, an important eye disease usually manifested by high intraocular pressure (IOP); left untreated, glaucoma can lead to blindness. The patients were currently on two medications (A and B) to be taken together for this condition. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the patients could drop medications \(A\) and \(B\) and be switched to a third medication (medication C) without much change in their IOP. Ten patients were enrolled in the study. They received medications \(A+B\) for 60 days and had their IOP measured at the end of the 60-day period (referred to as \(\mathrm{IOP}_{\mathrm{A}+\mathrm{B}}\) ). They were then taken off medications \(A\) and \(B\) and switched to medication \(C\), which they took for an additional 60 days. IOP was measured a second time at the end of the 60 -day period while the patient was on medication \(\mathrm{C}\) (referred to as \(\mathrm{IOP}_{\mathrm{C}}\) ). The results were as shown in Table 7.12. What procedure can be used to test the hypothesis that there has been no mean difference in IOP after 60 days between the two drug regimens?

Researchers have reported that the incidence rate of cataracts may be elevated among people with excessive exposure to sunlight. To confirm this, a pilot study is conducted among 200 people ages \(65-69\) who report an excessive tendency to bum on exposure to sunlight. Of the 200 people, 4 develop cataracts over a 1-year period. Suppose the expected incidence rate of cataracts among \(65-\) to 69 -year olds is \(1 \%\) over a 1 -year period. What test procedure can be used to compare the 1-year rate of cataracts in this population with that in the general population?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.