Energy cost of running: Physiologists have studied the steady-state oxygen
consumption (measured per unit of mass) in a running animal as a function of
its velocity (i.e., its speed). They have determined that the relationship is
approximately linear, at least over an appropriate range of velocities. The
table on the following page gives the velocity \(v\), in kilometers per hour,
and the oxygen consumption \(E\), in milliliters of oxygen per gram per hour,
for the rhea, a large, flightless South American bird. \({ }^{27}\) (For
comparison, 10 kilometers per hour is about \(6.2\) miles per hour.) $$
\begin{array}{|c|c|}
\hline \text { Velocity } v & \text { Oxygen consumption } E \\
\hline 2 & 1.0 \\
\hline 5 & 2.1 \\
\hline 10 & 4.0 \\
\hline 12 & 4.3 \\
\hline
\end{array}
$$ a. Find the equation of the regression line for \(E\) in terms of \(v\).
b. The slope of the linear function giving oxygen consumption in terms of
velocity is called the cost of transport for the animal, since it measures the
energy required to move a unit mass by 1 unit distance. What is the cost of
transport for the rhea?
c. Physiologists have determined the general approximate formula \(C=8.5
\mathrm{~W}^{-0.40}\) for the cost of transport \(C\) of an animal weighing \(W\)
grams. If the rhea weighs 22,000 grams, is its cost of transport from part b
higher or lower than what the general formula would predict? Is the rhea a
more or a less efficient runner than a typical animal its size?
d. What would your equation from part a lead you to estimate for the oxygen
consumption of a rhea at rest? Would you expect that estimate to be higher or
lower than the actual level of oxygen consumption of a rhea at rest?