/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 United States population growth:... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

United States population growth: In 1960 the population of the United States was about \(180 \mathrm{mil-}\) lion. Since that time the population has increased by approximately \(1.2 \%\) each year. This is a verbal description of the function \(N=N(t)\), where \(N\) is the population, in millions, and \(t\) is the number of years since 1960 . a. Express in functional notation the population of the United States in 1963. Calculate its value. b. Use the verbal description of \(N\) to make a table of values that shows U.S. population in millions from 1960 through \(1965 .\) c. Make a graph of U.S. population versus time. Be sure to label your graph appropriately. d. Verify that the formula \(180 \times 1.012^{t}\) million people, where \(t\) is the number of years since 1960 , gives the same values as those you found in the table in part b. (Note: Because \(t\) is the number of years since 1960, you would use \(t=2\) to get the population in 1962.) e. Assuming that the population has been growing at the same percentage rate since 1960 , what value does the formula above give for the population in 2000? (Note: The actual population in 2000 was about 281 million.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) In 1963, the population was about 186.54 million. b) & c) Table and graph show population grows each year. d) Formula verified. e) Formula predicts ~260 million; actual was ~281 million.

Step by step solution

01

Express Population in 1963

Write the formula for calculating the population in the year 1963. Since 1963 is 3 years after 1960, we set \(t = 3\). The formula according to the problem is \(N(t) = 180 \times 1.012^t\). Substitute \(t = 3\) into the formula: \(N(3) = 180 \times 1.012^3\). Calculate this using a calculator to find the population in millions.
02

Calculate Population for Each Year (1960-1965)

Using the formula \(N(t) = 180 \times 1.012^t\), calculate the population for each year from 1960 to 1965. Start with \(t = 0\) for 1960, \(t = 1\) for 1961, and so on up to \(t = 5\) for 1965. Record each value to create a table.
03

Create Table of Values

Based on calculations from Step 2, create a table that shows the population in millions for each year from 1960 to 1965. Include all your calculated results from the previous step.
04

Graph Population Over Time

Using the table from Step 3, create a graph where the x-axis represents the time in years (1960 to 1965) and the y-axis represents the population in millions. Ensure the graph has appropriately labeled axes and plot each calculated point.
05

Verify Formula with Table Values

Confirm that the formula \(180 \times 1.012^t\) gives values matching those in the table for each year from 1960 to 1965. Re-check any mismatches by recalculating to ensure accuracy.
06

Predict Population in 2000

Use the formula \(N(t) = 180 \times 1.012^t\) to predict the population for the year 2000. Since 2000 is 40 years after 1960, set \(t = 40\). Calculate \(N(40) = 180 \times 1.012^{40}\) and compare this result with the actual 2000 population, 281 million.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Modeling
Population modeling is a mathematical way to understand how populations change over time. One common model is the exponential growth model, which applies to situations where a population grows by a constant percentage each year. In the given exercise, we're looking at the U.S population modeled with this concept.
Exponential growth implies that the percentage growth rate stays consistent. Here, the U.S. population increases by 1.2% annually. We use the formula: \[N(t) = 180 \times 1.012^t\]where:
  • \(N(t)\) is the population at time \(t\), in millions
  • 180 is the initial population in 1960
  • 1.012 represents a 1.2% annual growth rate
  • \(t\) is the number of years after 1960
This approach helps us make future predictions and better understand historical data.
Functional Notation
Functional notation helps us express mathematical relationships clearly. In this context, it shows how the U.S. population changes over the years.When using functional notation for exponential models, like the one in the exercise, you express the model as a function of time, \(N(t)\). Here, \(N\) is our function, and \(t\) represents the number of years since 1960.For 1963, you would plug in \(t = 3\) (since 1963 is 3 years after 1960) as follows:\[N(3) = 180 \times 1.012^3\]This substitute helps us find the population in 1963. This method is handy because it lets us quickly find the population for any year after 1960, providing clarity and precision.
Population Graphing
Graphing population data allows us to visualize trends over time easily. Once you have calculated the population for each year from 1960 to 1965 using the given formula, displaying this data using a graph can provide insight into growth trends.To create a graph:
  • Label the x-axis as "Years" (from 1960 to 1965)
  • Label the y-axis as "Population in Millions"
  • Plot the calculated points for each year (e.g., \((0, 180)\) for 1960)
By connecting these points, you would observe an upward slope, indicating population growth. Such visual representation makes it easier to understand the nature of exponential growth compared to linear growth.
Population Prediction
Predicting future population helps in planning and resource allocation. Using models like the one in this exercise, predictions can be made even for periods well beyond the initial data range.For predicting the U.S. population in 2000:
  • Set \(t = 40\) because 2000 is 40 years after 1960
  • Use the formula: \[N(40) = 180 \times 1.012^{40}\]
Calculate to find the predicted population. This exercise reveals that according to the model, the population in 2000 would be around the number calculated. Comparing that with the actual 2000 population of 281 million helps us verify the model's accuracy in reflecting real-world data and spotting potential deviations or changes in growth rates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Arterial blood flow: Medical evidence shows that a small change in the radius of an artery can indicate a large change in blood flow. For example, if one artery has a radius only \(5 \%\) larger than another, the blood flow rate is \(1.22\) times as large. Further information is given in the table below. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Increase in radius } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Times greater blood } \\ \text { flow rate } \end{array} \\ \hline 5 \% & 1.22 \\ \hline 10 \% & 1.46 \\ \hline 15 \% & 1.75 \\ \hline 20 \% & 2.07 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use the average rate of change to estimate how many times greater the blood flow rate is in an artery that has a radius \(12 \%\) larger than another. b. Explain why if the radius is increased by \(12 \%\) and then we increase the radius of the new artery by \(12 \%\) again, the total increase in the radius is \(25.44 \%\). c. Use parts a and \(b\) to answer the following question: How many times greater is the blood flow rate in an artery that is \(25.44 \%\) larger in radius than another? d. Answer the question in part c using the average rate of change.

Education and income: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2004 the median (middle of the range) annual income of a high school graduate with no further education was about \(\$ 37,000\) per year. If we assume that it takes 4 years to earn a bachelor's degree and 2 additional years to earn a master's degree, the median annual income increases by \(14 \%\) for each year spent toward successful completion of a degree. This describes a function \(I=I(y)\), where \(I\) is the median income in 2004 for a person with y years of college education. a. Express in functional notation the median income in 2004 of an individual with an associate degree, which requires 2 years of college. Calculate the value. b. Make a table of values that shows the median income in 2004 for individuals completing 0 through 4 years of college. c. Make a graph of median income versus years of college completed. Be sure to provide appropriate labels. d. Verify that the formula \(I=37 \times 1.14^{y}\) thousand dollars, where \(y\) is the number of years of college completed, gives the same values as those you found in the table you made.e. Using the formula given in part d, find the median income in 2004 of an individual who has a master's degree. f. Assuming it takes 3 years beyond the master's degree to complete a Ph.D., and assuming the formula in part \(d\) applies, what was the median income of a Ph.D. in 2004? g. In fact, the same rate of increase does not apply for the years spent on a Ph.D. The actual median income for a Ph.D. in 2004 was \(\$ 100,000\). Does that mean that the increase in median income for years spent earning a Ph.D. is higher or lower than \(14 \%\) per year?

Falling with a parachute: If an average-size man jumps from an airplane with a properly opening parachute, his downward velocity \(v=v(t)\), in feet per second, \(t\) seconds into the fall is given by the following table. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} t=\text { Seconds } \\ \text { into the fall } \end{array} & v=\text { Velocity } \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 1 & 16 \\ \hline 2 & 19.2 \\ \hline 3 & 19.84 \\ \hline 4 & 19.97 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Explain why you expect \(v\) to have a limiting value and what this limiting value represents physically. b. Estimate the terminal velocity of the parachutist.

Equity in a home: When you purchase a home by securing a mortgage, the total paid toward the principal is your equity in the home. (Technically, the lending agency calculates your equity by subtracting the amount you still owe on your mortgage from the current value of your home, which may be higher or lower than your principal.) If your mortgage is for \(P\) dollars, and if the term of the mortgage is \(t\) months, then your equity \(E\), in dollars, after \(k\) monthly payments is given by $$ E=P \times \frac{(1+r)^{k}-1}{(1+r)^{t}-1} $$ Here \(r\) is the monthly interest rate as a decimal, with \(r=\mathrm{APR} / 12\).c. Find a formula that gives your equity after \(y\) years of payments. Suppose you have a home mortgage of \(\$ 400,000\) for 30 years at an APR of \(6 \%\). a. What is the monthly rate as a decimal? Round your answer to three decimal places. b. Express, using functional notation, your equity after 20 years of payments, and then calculate that value.

Sound pressure and decibels: Sound exerts a pressure \(P\) on the human ear. \({ }^{6}\) This pressure increases as the loudness of the sound increases. If the loudness \(D\) is measured in decibels and the pressure \(P\) in dynes \({ }^{7}\) per square centimeter, then the relationship is given by $$ P=0.0002 \times 1.122^{D} . $$ b. A decibel level of 120 causes pain to the ear and can result in damage. What is the corresponding pressure level on the ear?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.