Chapter 2: Problem 3
Show that the following sequences \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) are monotonic: (a) \(a_{n}=n !, n=1,2, \ldots ;\) (b) \(a_{n}=2^{-n}, n=1,2, \ldots ;\) (c) \(a_{n}=n+\frac{1}{n}, n=1,2, \ldots\)
Short Answer
Expert verified
(a) Increasing; (b) Decreasing; (c) Increasing.
Step by step solution
01
Show that Sequence (a) is Monotonic
The sequence is defined as \( a_n = n! \). To determine if it's monotonic, we compute \( a_{n+1} = (n+1)! = (n+1) \cdot n! \). Since \( n+1 > 1 \) for all \( n \geq 1 \), it follows that \( a_{n+1} > a_n \). Therefore, \( a_n = n! \) is a strictly increasing sequence.
02
Show that Sequence (b) is Monotonic
The sequence is given by \( a_n = 2^{-n} \). To check for monotonicity, compare \( a_{n+1} = 2^{-(n+1)} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2^{-n} \) with \( a_n = 2^{-n} \). Since \( \frac{1}{2} < 1 \), we have \( a_{n+1} < a_n \). Thus, the sequence \( a_n = 2^{-n} \) is strictly decreasing.
03
Show that Sequence (c) is Monotonic
Consider \( a_n = n + \frac{1}{n} \). To check if it's monotonic, evaluate \( a_{n+1} = n+1 + \frac{1}{n+1} \) and compare to \( a_n \). We have \( a_{n+1} - a_n = (n+1 + \frac{1}{n+1}) - (n + \frac{1}{n}) = 1 + \frac{1}{n+1} - \frac{1}{n} \). Since \( \frac{1}{n+1} < \frac{1}{n} \), the expression simplifies to a positive number, so \( a_{n+1} > a_n \). Hence, the sequence is strictly increasing.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Factorial Sequence
A factorial sequence is one where each term is defined as the factorial of a natural number. The factorial of a number, denoted as \( n! \), is the product of all positive integers less than or equal to \( n \). For example, \( 5! = 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 120 \). In terms of sequences, when \( a_n = n! \), we can observe this sequence by calculating its initial elements:
- \( a_1 = 1! = 1 \)
- \( a_2 = 2! = 2 \)
- \( a_3 = 3! = 6 \)
- \( a_4 = 4! = 24 \)
Exponential Decay
Exponential decay describes a process where quantities diminish at rates proportional to their current value. In a sequence like \( a_n = 2^{-n} \), the decay factor is the number 2 raised to the power of \(-n\). This particular sequence decreases because each subsequent term is half the previous term:
- \( a_1 = 2^{-1} = \frac{1}{2} \)
- \( a_2 = 2^{-2} = \frac{1}{4} \)
- \( a_3 = 2^{-3} = \frac{1}{8} \)
- \( a_4 = 2^{-4} = \frac{1}{16} \)
Sequence Comparison
Sequence comparison involves evaluating the relationship between terms in a sequence. For a sequence to be classified under a specific monotonic behavior, you must determine whether the sequence values consistently increase, decrease, or remain unchanged.
For instance, in comparing sequences where \( a_n = n! \) and \( a_n = n + \frac{1}{n} \), we recognize both are "strictly increasing." This is done by comparing \( a_{n+1} \) and \( a_n \) directly.
For \( a_n = n! \), knowing \( a_{n+1} \) equals \((n+1)! = (n+1) \cdot n!\), we see it is greater than \( n! \).
Meanwhile, in \( a_n = 2^{-n} \), calculating \( a_{n+1} \) and finding it equals \( \frac{1}{2} \ a_n \), shows it is less than \( a_n \). Sequence comparison is often the initial step to determine the overall pattern or trend within a sequence.
For instance, in comparing sequences where \( a_n = n! \) and \( a_n = n + \frac{1}{n} \), we recognize both are "strictly increasing." This is done by comparing \( a_{n+1} \) and \( a_n \) directly.
For \( a_n = n! \), knowing \( a_{n+1} \) equals \((n+1)! = (n+1) \cdot n!\), we see it is greater than \( n! \).
Meanwhile, in \( a_n = 2^{-n} \), calculating \( a_{n+1} \) and finding it equals \( \frac{1}{2} \ a_n \), shows it is less than \( a_n \). Sequence comparison is often the initial step to determine the overall pattern or trend within a sequence.
Strictly Increasing
A sequence is strictly increasing if each term is larger than the one before it. This means that for any natural number \( n \), \( a_{n+1} > a_n \). This increase is "strict" because it holds without exception throughout.
Consider the sequence \( a_n = n + \frac{1}{n} \):
Strictness ensures that there are no plateaus or static terms.
Consider the sequence \( a_n = n + \frac{1}{n} \):
- Here, adding \( \frac{1}{n} \) ensures the terms don't simplify into just \( n \), yet they still grow with increasing values of \( n \).
- So, with \( a_1 = 1 + 1 = 2 \) and progressing, \( a_2 = 2 + \frac{1}{2} = 2.5 \) becomes greater than \( a_1 \).
Strictness ensures that there are no plateaus or static terms.
Strictly Decreasing
A sequence is strictly decreasing when each term is lesser than the preceding one. For such sequences, \( a_{n+1} < a_n \) holds true for all terms, making the decrease consistent. An example is \( a_n = 2^{-n} \):
The strictness implies no two terms are equal, preserving a continuous downgrade in value. Such a categorization is helpful in identifying limits or concluding asymptotic behavior as it narrows towards zero or another lower boundary over time.
- Here, the values diminish by taking each prior term and multiplying it by \( \frac{1}{2} \), which is less than 1.
- Starting with \( a_1 = \frac{1}{2} \), this leads naturally to \( a_2 = \frac{1}{4} \), then \( a_3 = \frac{1}{8} \).
The strictness implies no two terms are equal, preserving a continuous downgrade in value. Such a categorization is helpful in identifying limits or concluding asymptotic behavior as it narrows towards zero or another lower boundary over time.