/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 A study of the faculty at U.S. m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A study of the faculty at U.S. medical schools in 2006 revealed that \(32 \%\) of the faculty were women and \(68 \%\) were men. Of the female faculty, \(31 \%\) were full/ associate professors, \(47 \%\) were assistant professors, and \(22 \%\) were instructors. Of the male faculty, \(51 \%\) were full/associate professors, \(37 \%\) were assistant professors, and \(12 \%\) were instructors. If a faculty member at a U.S. medical school selected at random holds the rank of full/associate professor, what is the probability that she is female?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability that a faculty member is female, given that they hold the rank of full/associate professor, is approximately \(0.2224\) or \(22.24\%.\)

Step by step solution

01

Determine the probabilities of each gender and rank.

First, let's find the probability of each gender and rank as a percentage. - Female faculty: 32% - Male faculty: 68% - Female Full/Associate Professors: 31% of 32% - Female Assistant Professors: 47% of 32% - Female Instructors: 22% of 32% - Male Full/Associate Professors: 51% of 68% - Male Assistant Professors: 37% of 68% - Male Instructors: 12% of 68%
02

Calculate the intersection probability and the probability of being a Full/Associate Professor.

Now we will calculate the probability of the intersection (Female and Full/Associate Professor) and the probability of being a Full/Associate Professor. - P(Female and Full/Associate Professor) = 31% of 32% = \(0.31 \times 0.32 = 0.0992\) - P(Full/Associate Professor) = Female Full/Associate Professors + Male Full/Associate Professors = 31% of 32% + 51% of 68% = \(0.31 \times 0.32 + 0.51 \times 0.68 = 0.0992 + 0.3468 = 0.446\)
03

Calculate the conditional probability using the formula.

Now we can use the formula for conditional probability and the probabilities we found in step 2. P(Female | Full/Associate Professor) = P(Female and Full/Associate Professor) / P(Full/Associate Professor) = \(0.0992 / 0.446 \approx 0.2224\)
04

Express the answer as a probability.

Finally, we will express the result as a probability. The probability that a faculty member is female, given that they hold the rank of full/associate professor, is approximately 0.2224 or 22.24%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
Probability theory helps us understand how likely events are to happen, using calculations based on known data.
In this exercise, we deal with conditional probability, which is the likelihood of event A happening given event B has occurred.
For example, let's say we know someone is a full/associate professor. What are the chances they are female?
This is a classic case of conditional probability.
  • The probability of an event A occurring, given another event B, is written as \( P(A | B) \).
  • It can be calculated using the formula: \( P(A \text{ and } B) / P(B) \).
This formula requires two pieces of information:
  • The probability of both events happening together (\( P(A \text{ and } B) \)).
  • The probability of event B occurring (\( P(B) \)).
By applying this to our scenario, we can analyze the data on faculty ranks and gender to calculate specific probabilities.
Gender Statistics in Academia
Gender statistics offer insight into the representation of different genders within academic settings.
They help us understand the distribution of men and women across various levels and roles in academia, highlighting potential areas where gender disparities exist.
In our exercise, the 2006 study of U.S. medical school faculty highlighted some interesting gender distributions.
  • 32% of faculty were women, a notable statistic indicating underrepresentation.
  • The rank distribution showed that fewer women achieved higher senior positions, like full/associate professorships.
Analyzing these numbers helps not only in understanding current representation but also in tracking progress over time.
Are efforts to increase women's participation in these roles effective?
Such statistics guide policies and initiatives aimed at reducing gender gaps in academia.
Rank Distribution
Rank distribution refers to how individuals are spread across different levels or ranks within an organization or institution like a university.
Understanding rank distribution assists in pinpointing hierarchical or positional trends based on characteristics like gender or experience.
In the 2006 medical faculty study, rank distribution was assessed separately for men and women, revealing:
  • 31% of female faculty were full/associate professors, while 47% were assistant professors, and 22% were instructors.
  • In contrast, 51% of male faculty were full/associate professors, followed by 37% assistant professors, and 12% instructors.
This data tells us that a higher percentage of male faculty reached full or associate professorship status compared to female faculty.
Such distributions can point to systematic issues that may prevent equal advancement opportunities, highlighting a need for measures to support equitable career progression.
By addressing these challenges, institutions can create more diverse and inclusive environments.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table summarizes the results of a poll conducted with 1154 adults. $$\begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Income, \$ } & \text { Range, \% } & \text { Rich, \% } & \text { Class, \% } & \text { Poor, \% } \\ \hline \text { Less than 15,000 } & 11.2 & 0 & 24 & 76 \\ \hline 15,000-29,999 & 18.6 & 3 & 60 & 37 \\ \hline 30,000-49,999 & 24.5 & 0 & 86 & 14 \\ \hline 50,000-74,999 & 21.9 & 2 & 90 & 8 \\ \hline 75,000 \text { and higher } & 23.8 & 5 & 91 & 4 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. What is the probability that a respondent chosen at random calls himself or herself middle class? b. If a randomly chosen respondent calls himself or herself middle class, what is the probability that the annual household income of that individual is between $$\$ 30.000$$ and $$\$ 49,999$$, inclusive? c. If a randomly chosen respondent calls himself or herself middle class, what is the probability that the individual's income is either less than or equal to $$\$ 29,999$$ or greater than or equal to $$\$ 50,000$$ ?

In an attempt to study the leading causes of airline crashes, the following data were compiled from records of airline crashes from 1959 to 1994 (excluding sabotage and military action). $$\begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Primary Factor } & \text { Accidents } \\ \hline \text { Pilot } & 327 \\ \hline \text { Airplane } & 49 \\ \hline \text { Maintenance } & 14 \\ \hline \text { Weather } & 22 \\ \hline \text { Airport/air traffic control } & 19 \\ \hline \text { Miscellaneous/other } & 15 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Assume that you have just learned of an airline crash and that the data give a generally good indication of the causes of airline crashes. Give an estimate of the probability that the primary cause of the crash was due to pilot error or bad weather.

Before being allowed to enter a maximum-security area at a military installation, a person must pass three independent identification tests: a voice-pattern test, a fingerprint test, and a handwriting test. If the reliability of the first test is \(97 \%\), the reliability of the second test is \(98.5 \%\), and that of the third is \(98.5 \%\), what is the probability that this security system will allow an improperly identified person to enter the maximumsecurity area?enter the maximumsecurity area?

Determine whether the statement is true or false. If it is true, explain why it is true. If it is false, give an example to show why it is false. If \(A\) and \(B\) are mutually exclusive and \(P(B) \neq 0\), then \(P(A \mid B)=0 .\)

There are 12 signs of the Zodiac: Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricom, Aquarius, and Pisces. Each sign corresponds to a different calendar period of approximately 1 month. Assuming that a person is just as likely to be born under one sign as another, what is the probability that in a group of five people at least two of them a. Have the same sign?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.