/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 In March 2004, the U.S. Agricult... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In March 2004, the U.S. Agriculture Department announced plans to test approximately 243,000 slaughtered cows per year for mad cow disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy). \(^{17}\) When announcing the plan, the Agriculture Department stated that "by the laws of probability, that many tests should detect mad cow disease even if it is present in only 5 cows out of the 45 million in the nation." \(^{18}\) Test the Department's claim by computing the probability that, if only 5 out of 45 million cows had mad cow disease, at least 1 cow would test positive in a year (assuming the testing was done randomly).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability that at least one cow would test positive for mad cow disease in a year, given the described conditions, is approximately 0.999 or 99.9%. This supports the Agriculture Department's statement that their testing plan should be able to detect mad cow disease.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the probabilities of the events

We know that the number of cows with mad cow disease is 5 out of 45 million. Therefore, the probability that a cow has mad cow disease (positive case) is: \[\frac{5}{45,000,000} \]The probability that a cow is not infected with mad cow disease (negative case) is: \[1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000} \]
02

Calculate the probability of no positive tests

In this step, we will calculate the probability of not detecting any positive cases of mad cow disease in the 243,000 tests conducted in a year. To do this, we will simply find the probability of all tests being negative cases. Since the tests are independent, we can find the probability of all tests being negative cases by multiplying the probability of a single negative case by itself 243,000 times (the number of tests). This can be represented as: \[\left(1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000}\right)^{243,000} \]
03

Find the probability of at least one positive test

Now we will use the complement rule to find the probability of at least one positive case of mad cow disease being detected in the 243,000 tests. As mentioned earlier, the complement rule states that the probability of at least one event occurring is equal to 1 minus the probability of none of the events occurring. In this case, we can represent the probability of at least one positive case with the following equation: \[1 - \left(1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000}\right)^{243,000} \]
04

Evaluate the probability

Now we can plug in the values and compute the probability of detecting at least one positive case of mad cow disease: \[1 - \left(1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000}\right)^{243,000} \approx 0.999\] The probability that at least one cow would test positive for mad cow disease in a year, given the described conditions, is approximately 0.999 or 99.9%. This supports the Agriculture Department's statement that their testing plan should be able to detect mad cow disease.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistics
Statistics is a field of study that deals with the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data. It helps us make informed decisions by providing insights into complex data sets.
In the context of the exercise, statistics is used to estimate and predict occurrences of events, like detecting mad cow disease among a massive population of cows. The U.S. Agriculture Department's approach involves making forecasts based on random sampling, which is a common statistical method.
A few key statistical concepts include:
  • Random Sampling: A technique where each member of a population has an equal chance of being selected. It's crucial for ensuring unbiased results and is used in the exercise to randomly test cows for the disease.
  • Probability: Statistical studies often involve calculating probabilities to predict the likelihood of certain outcomes, as shown through probability calculation of detecting disease.
  • Complement Rule: This method is used to simplify probability calculations, often beneficial in assessing "at least one" scenarios, as utilized in the solution.
Statistics provide the foundational framework for understanding and solving complex problems like the probability of disease in livestock through manageable chunks of data.
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment involves evaluating the probability and impact of an event, particularly unfavorable ones. In this context, the U.S. Agriculture Department aimed to assess the risk of mad cow disease being present without detection.
Key elements in risk assessment include:
  • Identifying Risks: Recognizing potential negative outcomes, such as undetected mad cow disease among cows.
  • Probability Assessment: Calculating the likelihood of such risks occurring; for instance, computing the probability that not a single infected cow is detected among tested cows.
  • Impact Evaluation: Understanding the consequences should the risk materialize — for instance, the implications of mad cow disease spreading undetected.
Risk assessment helps organizations like the U.S. Agriculture Department develop intervention strategies, ensuring that they can detect and mitigate the potential impact of diseases effectively.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation is a fundamental part of probability theory, which involves determining the likelihood of different outcomes. This aspect was pivotal in answering the exercise's question about the probability of detecting mad cow disease.
Steps to carry out probability calculations:
  • Define Event Probability: As demonstrated, you start by identifying the probability of an event occurring, in this case, a cow having mad cow disease is \(\frac{5}{45,000,000} \).
  • Compute Non-occurrence Probability: Next, calculate the probability of the event not happening, done here as \(1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000} \).
  • Use Complement Rule: To find the probability of at least one positive test, apply the complement rule: 1 minus the probability that none occurred.
    • The formula used: \(1 - (1 - \frac{5}{45,000,000})^{243,000} \).
    • Resulted in a 99.9% chance of finding at least one infected cow through the tests conducted.
Probability calculations offer a precise mechanism to predict outcomes, aiding in decision-making processes, such as ensuring effective disease surveillance in livestock.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Based on data from Nielsen Research, there is a \(15 \%\) chance that any television that is turned on during the time of the evening newscasts will be tuned to \(\mathrm{ABC}\) 's evening news show. \({ }^{58}\) Your company wishes to advertise on a small local station carrying \(\mathrm{ABC}\) that serves a community with 2,500 households that regularly tune in during this time slot. Find the approximate probability that at least 400 households will be tuned in to the show. HINT [See Example 4.]

In a certain political poll, each person polled has a \(90 \%\) probability of telling his or her real preference. Suppose that \(55 \%\) of the population really prefer candidate Goode, and \(45 \%\) prefer candidate Slick. First find the probability that a person polled will say that he or she prefers Goode. Then find the approximate probability that, if 1,000 people are polled, more than \(52 \%\) will say they prefer Goode.

Calculate the expected value of the given random variable \(X .\) [Exercises \(23,24,27\), and 28 assume familiarity with counting arguments and probability (Section 7.4).] \(\nabla X\) is the number of green marbles that Suzan has in her hand after she selects four marbles from a bag containing three red marbles and two green ones.

If we model after-tax household income with a normal distribution, then the figures of a 1995 study imply the information in the following table, which should be used for Exercises \(35-40^{55}\) Assume that the distribution of incomes in each country is normal, and round all percentages to the nearest whole number: Which country has a higher proportion of very poor families (income \(\$ 12,000\) or less): Canada or Switzerland?

Exercises \(45-50\) are based on the following information, gathered from student testing of a statistical software package called MODSTAT. \(^{56}\) Students were asked to complete certain tasks using the software, without any instructions. The results were as follows. (Assume that the time for each task is normally distributed. Assuming that the time it takes a student to complete each task is independent of the others, find the probability that a student will take at least 10 minutes to complete each of Tasks 3 and 4 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.