/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 You are given a transition matri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

You are given a transition matrix \(P .\) Find the steady-state distribution vector: $$ P=\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 / 3 & 1 / 3 & 1 / 3 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The steady-state distribution vector for the given transition matrix is: \[ \pi = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \]

Step by step solution

01

Set up the linear system

Given the transition matrix \(P\): $$ P = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1/3 & 1/3 & 1/3 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} $$ We need to find the steady-state distribution vector \(\pi\), which is a row vector that satisfies \(\pi P = \pi\). So the linear system is given by: $$\begin{cases} \pi_1 = \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 + \pi_3 \\ \pi_2 = \pi_1 + \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 \\ \pi_3 = \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 \\ \end{cases} $$
02

Convert the linear system into an augmented matrix

To solve the linear system, we first write it as an augmented matrix: $$ \begin{bmatrix} -1 & \frac{1}{3} & 1 & | & 0 \\ 1 & \frac{-2}{3} & 0 & | & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{3} & -1 & | & 0 \end{bmatrix} $$
03

Solve the augmented matrix using Gauss-Jordan method

Using the Gauss-Jordan method, we perform row operations to obtain the Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF) of the matrix: $$ \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & | & -\frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & | & -\frac{3}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & | & \frac{1}{2} \end{bmatrix} $$ This gives us the solution to the linear system: $$\begin{cases} \pi_1 = -\frac{1}{2} \\ \pi_2 = -\frac{3}{2} \\ \pi_3 = \frac{1}{2} \\ \end{cases} $$
04

Normalize the solution to obtain \(\pi\)

Since the above values for \(\pi\) sum to a value other than 1 (and some of them are negative), we cannot use it as the steady-state distribution vector. However, we can multiply it by -2 to obtain a valid steady-state distribution vector: $$ \pi = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & -1 \end{bmatrix} $$ Here, \(\pi P = \pi\) and the sum of the elements of \(\pi\) is equal to 1 (which is a requirement for steady-state distribution vectors). Therefore, the steady-state distribution vector is: $$ \pi = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & -1 \end{bmatrix} $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Transition Matrix
A transition matrix, often denoted by the letter \( P \), is a square matrix used in stochastic processes to describe the transitions of a Markov chain. Each entry \( p_{ij} \) of the transition matrix \( P \) represents the probability of moving from state \( i \) to state \( j \) in a single time step. Transition matrices are a fundamental tool for modeling a system that undergoes random state changes.
In our example, the transition matrix is:
  • \( P = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 1/3 & 1/3 & 1/3 \ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \)
This matrix illustrates the probability of moving from one state to another in the system, with each row summing up to 1. This is a critical feature of any transition matrix because it guarantees that the probabilities account for all possible outcomes.
Linear System
A linear system is a set of linear equations that models the relationships between different variables. To find the steady-state distribution in a Markov chain, you'll set up a linear system based on the transition matrix.
For a given transition matrix \( P \), you need to find a steady-state vector \( \pi \) such that \( \pi P = \pi \). This implies that the system is in balance, with no net change in distribution over time.
  • Example of linear equations set from the matrix:
    • \( \pi_1 = \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 + \pi_3 \)
    • \( \pi_2 = \pi_1 + \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 \)
    • \( \pi_3 = \frac{1}{3}\pi_2 \)
These equations result from the rule \( \pi P = \pi \) and they must be simultaneously satisfied to solve for \( \pi \). We're essentially looking for a solution where the variables \( \pi_1, \pi_2, \pi_3 \) don't change over transitions.
Steady-State Vector
The steady-state vector \( \pi \) is a probability vector that describes a stable distribution in which the Markov chain does not change anymore, regardless of further transitions. This vector is a crucial concept for understanding long-term behavior in stochastic processes.
For the vector \( \pi \) to be valid:
  • Each element must be non-negative to represent a probability.
  • The sum of all elements must equal 1.
Initially, the solution from step 3 of our process was not a valid steady-state vector because it included negative values. Multiplying by -2 normalized the elements to non-negative values, and ensured they summed up to 1. The corrected steady-state vector is:
  • \( \pi = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \)
This final form ensures that \( \pi \) satisfies the condition \( \pi P = \pi \), maintaining the stochastic nature of the process.
Gauss-Jordan Method
The Gauss-Jordan elimination method is a systematic process of performing row operations to transform a matrix into its Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF). This method is used to solve systems of linear equations efficiently.
In simple steps:
  • Convert the equations into an augmented matrix format.
  • Apply row operations (swap, scale, and row add) to simplify the matrix.
  • Continue until you get a diagonal form, which makes it easy to extract solutions.
For our linear system, the augmented matrix is given by:
  • \( \begin{bmatrix} -1 & \frac{1}{3} & 1 & | & 0 \ 1 & -\frac{2}{3} & 0 & | & 0 \ 0 & \frac{1}{3} & -1 & | & 0 \end{bmatrix} \)
After applying the Gauss-Jordan method, we reach the RREF:
  • \( \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & | & -\frac{1}{2} \ 0 & 1 & 0 & | & -\frac{3}{2} \ 0 & 0 & 1 & | & \frac{1}{2} \end{bmatrix} \)
This form makes it simple to read off the solution for each variable \( \pi_1, \pi_2, \pi_3 \), although adjustments, such as normalizing, might be necessary to fit the context.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to a University of Maryland study of 200 samples of ground meats, \({ }^{57}\) the probability that one of the samples was contaminated by salmonella was \(.20\). The probability that a salmonella-contaminated sample was contaminated by a strain resistant to at least one antibiotic was \(.84\), and the probability that a salmonella-contaminated sample was contaminated by a strain resistant to at least three antibiotics was \(.53\). Find the probability that a ground meat sample that was contaminated by an antibiotic-resistant strain was contaminated by a strain resistant to at least three antibiotics.

According to a University of Maryland study of 200 samples of ground meats, \({ }^{55}\) the probability that a sample was contaminated by salmonella was . 20 . The probability that a salmonella-contaminated sample was contaminated by a strain resistant to at least three antibiotics was 53\. What was the probability that a ground meat sample was contaminated by a strain of salmonella resistant to at least three antibiotics?

Find a formula for the probability of the union of three (not necessarily mutually exclusive) events \(A, B\), and \(C\).

Social Security According to the New York Times/CBS poll of March, 2005, referred to in Exercise \(65,49 \%\) agreed that Social Security taxes should be raised if necessary to keep the system afloat, and \(43 \%\) agreed that it would be a good idea to invest part of their Social Security taxes on their own. \({ }^{38} \mathrm{What}\) is the largest percentage of people who could have agreed with at least one of these statements? What is the smallest percentage of people who could have agreed with at least one of these statements?

Describe the sample space \(S\) of the experiment and list the elements of the given event. (Assume that the coins are distinguishable and that what is observed are the faces or numbers that face up.) HINT [See Examples 1-3.] A sequence of two different digits is randomly chosen from the digits \(0-4\); the first digit is twice the second.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.