/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Solve the LP problems. If no opt... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Solve the LP problems. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. Minimize \(c=0.2 x+0.3 y\) subject to \(\begin{aligned} 0.2 x+0.1 y & \geq 1 \\\ 0.15 x+0.3 y & \geq 1.5 \\ 10 x+10 y & \geq 80 \\ x \geq 0, y \geq 0 & \end{aligned}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The feasible region for the given constraints is an unbounded space extending infinitely to the right. The objective function \(c = 0.2x + 0.3y\) can be made arbitrarily large within the feasible region by increasing \(x\) or \(y\) indefinitely. As a result, no optimal solution exists for this linear programming problem, and the objective function is unbounded.

Step by step solution

01

Sketching the feasible region

To visualize the constraints, plot each constraint on a graph. The feasible region will be the intersection of the non-negative \(x\) and \(y\) values, which are both greater than or equal to zero, and satisfy all the constraints. The given constraints are: 1. \(0.2x + 0.1y \geq 1\) 2. \(0.15x + 0.3y \geq 1.5\) 3. \(10x + 10y \geq 80\) 4. \(x \geq 0\) 5. \(y \geq 0\) Convert each inequality to an equation to plot the lines: 1. \(0.2x + 0.1y = 1\) 2. \(0.15x + 0.3y = 1.5\) 3. \(10x + 10y = 80\)
02

Determine the feasible region

Find the intersection points of the lines and identify the region that satisfies all the constraints. Upon plotting the lines and analyzing the constraints, the feasible region can be observed as an unbounded space extending infinitely to the right.
03

Applying the simplex method

As the feasible region is unbounded, let's check whether the objective function is also unbounded in the feasible region. If this is the case, no optimal solution will exist. We can analyze this without having to perform the entire simplex method algorithm, by noticing that the objective function \(c = 0.2x + 0.3y\) can be made arbitrarily large within the feasible region by increasing \(x\) or \(y\) indefinitely. As the solution is unbounded in the feasible region, no optimal solution exists for this linear programming problem. In conclusion, the objective function is unbounded.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Feasible Region
In linear programming, the feasible region plays a crucial role in understanding which solutions are possible for a set problem. Think of the feasible region as a kind of play area on a graph. It's the space where all the possible solutions meet all the constraints given in a problem. The constraints usually involve inequalities and boundaries that define this region.

For our linear programming problem, we plotted the constraints and found a region on a graph:
  • Firstly, we take each inequality and turn it into equality temporarily, allowing us to sketch lines on a graph.
  • Next, we find where these lines intersect. This gives us points of reference to make up the edges of our feasible region.
In this problem, the feasible region turned out to be unbounded, meaning that it stretches out infinitely in some direction. This might happen when not all constraints effectively limit the edges of possible solutions.

Understanding the layout and boundaries of a feasible region can immediately tell us a lot about the potential solutions to the problem.
Objective Function
The objective function in a linear programming problem is what you either want to maximize or minimize. It’s usually written as a mathematical expression that involves the variables you are dealing with. Here, we aim to minimize the objective function, defined as:\[c = 0.2x + 0.3y\]

The coefficients of the variables (like the 0.2 and 0.3 here) tell us the relative contribution of each variable to the objective function's total value. Our goal is to find values for these variables, within the feasible region, that make this function as small as possible.

In this particular problem, because the feasible region is unbounded, the objective function could be made as small or as large as desired. However, due to the problem’s structure, the concern isn't making it smallest but determining if there's a point inside the feasible region where this minimum can be optimally reached.

Always clearly define your objective function to understand what you set out to achieve with your linear programming model.
Simplex Method
The Simplex Method is a popular algorithm for solving linear programming problems. When tackling problems with more complex constraints, like in our case, using such a method offers a way to systematically check potential solutions.

The method involves:
  • Starting at a feasible corner point of the region.
  • Moving from one corner to another while improving the objective function value.
  • Continuing this until reaching the best possible value.
It's important to note that this method assumes a bounded feasible region. Because our problem had an unbounded region, we stopped a bit short. Noticing our objective function can increase indefinitely was enough to conclude no optimal solution exists.

This highlights a key reality of linear programming: sometimes the method provides insights not by completing itself but by instructing us when something’s fundamentally unsolvable or unrestricted.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(\nabla\) \mathrm{\\{} T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ~ S c h e d u l i n g ~ W e ~ r e t u r n ~ t o ~ y o u r ~ e x p l o i t s ~ c o - ~ ordinating distribution for the Tubular Ride Boogie Board Company. \({ }^{36}\) You will recall that the company has manufacturing plants in Tucson, Arizona and Toronto, Ontario, and you have been given the job of coordinating distribution of their latest model, the Gladiator, to their outlets in Honolulu and Venice Beach. The Tucson plant can manufacture up to 620 boards per week, while the Toronto plant, beset by labor disputes, can produce no more than 410 Gladiator boards per week. The outlet in Honolulu orders 500 Gladiator boards per week, while Venice Beach orders 530 boards per week. Transportation costs are as follows: Tucson to Honolulu: \(\$ 10 /\) board; Tucson to Venice Beach: \(\$ 5 /\) board; Toronto to Honolulu: \(\$ 20 /\) board; Toronto to Venice Beach: \(\$ 10 /\) board. Your manager has said that you are to be sure to fill all orders and ship the boogie boards at a minimum total transportation cost. How will you do it?

Solve the LP problems. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. Maximize and minimize \(\quad p=2 x-y\) subject to \(\begin{aligned} & x+y \geq 2 \\ & x-y \leq 2 \\ & x-y \geq-2 \\\ & x \leq 10, y \leq 10 . \end{aligned}\).

Use an example to show why there may be no optimal solution to a linear programming problem if the feasible region is unbounded.

$$ P=\left[\begin{array}{rrrr} -1 & 1 & 2 & -1 \\ 2 & -1 & -2 & -3 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 2 & 3 & 3 \end{array}\right] $$

Can the following linear programming problem be stated as a standard maximization problem? If so, do it; if not, explain why. \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Maximize } & p=3 x-2 y \\ \text { subject to } & x-y+z \geq 0 \\ & x-y-z \leq 6 \\ & x \geq 0, y \geq 0, z \geq 0 .\end{array}\) 28 Prices from Travelocity, at www.travelocity.com, for the week of June 3,2002 , as of May 5,2002 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.