/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 51 There should be at least 3 more ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

There should be at least 3 more grams of ingredient \(\mathrm{A}\) than ingredient \(\mathrm{B}\). (A) \(3 x-y \leq 0\) (B) \(x-3 y \geq 0\) (C) \(x-y \geq 3\) (D) \(3 x-y \geq 0\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct inequality to represent the condition that there should be at least 3 more grams of ingredient A than ingredient B is \(x - y \geq 3\), which corresponds to option (C).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the condition mentioned about the amounts of ingredients A and B#

Ingredient A should have at least 3 more grams than ingredient B. This means that the amount of ingredient A (let it be represented by x) minus the amount of ingredient B (let it be represented by y) should be greater than or equal to 3. Mathematically, this relationship can be written as: \( x - y\geq 3\). This is the inequality we are looking for.
02

Compare the inequality obtained with given options#

The inequality we have obtained is: \( x - y\geq 3\) Now we need to compare this with the given options: (A) \(3x - y\leq 0\): This is not the correct inequality as our inequality is in the form of \(x - y\geq 3\). (B) \(x - 3y\geq 0\): In this inequality, the difference bwtween the amounts is multiplied with 3 and hence this is also not correct as it does not represent the required condition. (C) \(x - y\geq 3\): This is the correct inequality as it precisely matches our obtained inequality. (D) \(3x - y\geq 0\): This inequality is also not correct as it does not represent the required condition. Thus, the correct inequality is given by option (C).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Inequalities
Linear inequalities are similar to linear equations but instead of an equal sign, they use inequality symbols like \(\leq\), \(\geq\), \(<\), or \(>\). These symbols help describe the relationship between two expressions that are not necessarily equal. Linear inequalities have wide applications in problem-solving variables and constraints.

To solve a linear inequality, we follow similar steps as those used for solving a linear equation. However, special care must be taken in the following cases:
  • When multiplying or dividing both sides of the inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign flips.
  • The solution of the inequality is often a range of values rather than a single number.
For the given problem, we identified the inequality \(x - y \geq 3\). This means the amount of ingredient \(A\) should exceed ingredient \(B\) by at least 3 grams. Note the use of \(\geq 3\) to indicate that \(x\) can be exactly 3 grams more or more than that compared to \(y\).
Understanding how to interpret these types of inequalities helps analyze and solve real-world problems where conditions such as "at least" or "no more than" arise regularly.
Problem Solving in Algebra
Algebra can be used to express relationships mathematically, making it easier to solve complex problems. In our exercise, we formed an inequality to express the condition regarding ingredient \(A\) and \(B\). This is a common strategy used in algebraic problem solving.

Here's a structured approach:
  • Understand the Problem: Identify what needs to be solved. In this case, we needed the relationship between two quantities.
  • Frame the Equation or Inequality: Translate the words into a mathematical expression or inequality.
  • Simplify and Solve: Rearrange terms if necessary to isolate the variable and find the solution.
  • Verify: After finding a solution, check if it satisfies all conditions given in the problem.
For the problem at hand, we successfully interpreted the condition "at least 3 more grams" into an inequality. We compared the result to options, confirming the correct option as \(x - y \geq 3\). It's key to understand this process, as recognizing patterns and translating them into mathematical language is central to algebraic reasoning.
Mathematical Modelling
Mathematical modelling is the process of using mathematics to solve real-world problems, which often involves forming equations or inequalities based on a given situation. In this exercise, we took a practical scenario involving ingredients, which was then translated into a mathematical inequality.

When building a model:
  • Identify the Variables: Determine what the unknown quantities in the problem are.
  • Formulate the Model: Use equations or inequalities to describe the relationships between variables.
  • Solve the Model: Use mathematical methods to find solutions to the problem described by the model.
  • Interpret the Solution: Relate the mathematical solution back to the real-world context.
For this exercise, \(x\) and \(y\) were our variables for the amounts of ingredients \(A\) and \(B\). The inequality \(x - y \geq 3\) formed our model. This simple yet powerful process demonstrates how algebraic tools can provide insights into and solutions for real-world situations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Can the value of the objective function decrease in passing from one tableau to the next? Explain.

\(\nabla\) Scheduling Because Joe Slim's brother was recently elected to the State Senate, Joe's financial advisement concern, Inside Information Inc., has been doing a booming trade, even though the financial counseling he offers is quite worthless. (None of his seasoned clients pays the slightest attention to his advice.) Slim charges different hourly rates to different categories of individuals: \(\$ 5,000 /\) hour for private citizens, \(\$ 50,000 /\) hour for corporate executives, and \(\$ 10,000 /\) hour for presidents of universities. Due to his taste for leisure, he feels that he can spend no more than 40 hours/week in consultation. On the other hand, Slim feels that it would be best for his intellect were he to devote at least 10 hours of consultation each week to university presidents. However, Slim always feels somewhat uncomfortable dealing with academics, so he would prefer to spend no more than half his consultation time with university presidents. Furthermore, he likes to think of himself as representing the interests of the common citizen, so he wishes to offer at least 2 more hours of his time each week to private citizens than to corporate executives and university presidents combined. Given all these restrictions, how many hours each week should he spend with each type of client in order to maximize his income?

Solve the LP problems. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. \(\vee\) Minimize \(c=-x+2 y\) subject to \(\begin{aligned} y & \leq \frac{2 x}{3} \\\ x & \leq 3 y \\ y & \geq 4 \\ x & \geq 6 \\ x+y & \leq 16 . \end{aligned}\)

Finance Senator Porkbarrel habitually overdraws his three bank accounts, at the Congressional Integrity Bank, Citizens' Trust, and Checks R Us. There are no penalties because the overdrafts are subsidized by the taxpayer. The Senate Ethics Committee tends to let slide irregular banking activities as long as they are not flagrant. At the moment (due to Congress" preoccupation with a Supreme Court nominee), a total overdraft of up to \(\$ 10,000\) will be overlooked. Porkbarrel's conscience makes him hesitate to overdraw accounts at banks whose names include expressions like "integrity" and "citizens' trust." The effect is that his overdrafts at the first two banks combined amount to no more than one-quarter of the total. On the other hand, the financial officers at Integrity Bank, aware that Senator Porkbarrel is a member of the Senate Banking Committee, "suggest" that he overdraw at least \(\$ 2,500\) from their bank. Find the amount he should overdraw from each bank in order to avoid investigation by the Ethics Committee and overdraw his account at Integrity by as much as his sense of guilt will allow.

Can the following linear programming problem be stated as a standard maximization problem? If so, do it; if not, explain why. \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Maximize } & p=-3 x-2 y \\ \text { subject to } & x-y+z \geq 0 \\ & x-y-z \geq-6 \\ & x \geq 0, y \geq 0, z \geq 0 .\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.