/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Maxim... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

\(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Maximize } & p=2 x+5 y+3 z \\ \text { subject to } & x+y+z \leq 150 \\ & x+y+z \geq 100 \\ & x \geq 0, y \geq 0, z \geq 0 .\end{array}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The optimal solution for the given linear programming problem is \(x = 0\), \(y = 150\), and \(z = 0\), which results in a maximum value of \(p = 750\).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the feasible region

Since we have constraints and we need to identify the area they define. We'll first visualize the constraints on a 3D coordinate system, focusing on the intersection of the planes formed by the first two constraints and their relationship with the non-negativity constraints.
02

Find the corner points of the feasible region

The feasible region is the intersection of the constraints, where all constraints hold true: 1. x + y + z = 100 (since x, y, and z are all non-negative, and we wish to find the largest value of p) 2. x + y + z ≤ 150 (we need to find the corner points where the equation equals 150) 3. x, y, and z are non-negative To find the corner points of the feasible region, we can consider the edges of the feasible region where at least two of x, y, or z are equal to 0: 1. x = 0 and y = 0: (0, 0, 100) 2. x = 0 and z = 0: (0, 100, 0) 3. y = 0 and z = 0: (100, 0, 0) 4. x = 0 and y + z = 150: (0, 150, 0) 5. x = 0 and x + z = 150: (0, 0, 150) 6. y = 0 and x + z = 150: (150, 0, 0) 7. y = 0 and x + y = 150: (150, 0, 0) Note that point (0, 150, 0) satisfies both constraint (3) and constraint (4) as it lies on the boundary of constraint (2) and satisfies constraint (1). Corner points are (0, 0, 100), (0, 100, 0), (100, 0, 0), and (0, 150, 0).
03

Evaluate the objective function at each corner point

Now we will evaluate the objective function, p = 2x + 5y + 3z, at each of the identified corner points: 1. p(0, 0, 100) = 2(0) + 5(0) + 3(100) = 300 2. p(0, 100, 0) = 2(0) + 5(100) + 3(0) = 500 3. p(100, 0, 0) = 2(100) + 5(0) + 3(0) = 200 4. p(0, 150, 0) = 2(0) + 5(150) + 3(0) = 750
04

Determine the values of x, y, and z that give the maximum value for p

Comparing the values of the objective function at each corner point, we find that the maximum value for p is 750, occurring at point (0, 150, 0). Thus, the optimal solution for this linear programming problem is x=0, y=150, and z=0, which results in a maximum value of p = 750.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

$$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Minimize } & c=s+3 t+u \\ \text { subject to } & 5 s-t \quad+v \geq 1,000 \\ u-v & \geq 2,000 \\ & \quad s+t \quad \geq 500 \\ & s \geq 0, t \geq 0, u \geq 0, v \geq 0 . \end{array} $$

You are thinking of making your home more energy efficient by replacing some of the light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs, and insulating part or all of your exterior walls. Each compact fluorescent light bulb costs \(\$ 4\) and saves you an average of \(\$ 2\) per year in energy costs, and each square foot of wall insulation costs \(\$ 1\) and saves you an average of \(\$ 0.20\) per year in energy costs. \(^{12}\) Your home has 60 light fittings and 1,100 sq. ft. of uninsulated exterior wall. You can spend no more than \(\$ 1,200\) and would like to save as much per year in energy costs as possible. How many compact fluorescent light bulbs and how many square feet of insulation should you purchase? How much will you save in energy costs per year?

\(\nabla\) \mathrm{\\{} T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ~ S c h e d u l i n g ~ W e ~ r e t u r n ~ t o ~ y o u r ~ e x p l o i t s ~ c o - ~ ordinating distribution for the Tubular Ride Boogie Board Company. \({ }^{36}\) You will recall that the company has manufacturing plants in Tucson, Arizona and Toronto, Ontario, and you have been given the job of coordinating distribution of their latest model, the Gladiator, to their outlets in Honolulu and Venice Beach. The Tucson plant can manufacture up to 620 boards per week, while the Toronto plant, beset by labor disputes, can produce no more than 410 Gladiator boards per week. The outlet in Honolulu orders 500 Gladiator boards per week, while Venice Beach orders 530 boards per week. Transportation costs are as follows: Tucson to Honolulu: \(\$ 10 /\) board; Tucson to Venice Beach: \(\$ 5 /\) board; Toronto to Honolulu: \(\$ 20 /\) board; Toronto to Venice Beach: \(\$ 10 /\) board. Your manager has said that you are to be sure to fill all orders and ship the boogie boards at a minimum total transportation cost. How will you do it?

Solve the LP problems. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. Minimize \(\quad \begin{aligned} c=2 x+4 y & \\ \text { subject to } & 0.1 x+0.1 y \geq 1 \\ & x+2 y \geq 14 \\ x \geq 0, y \geq 0 & \end{aligned}\)

$$ \begin{array}{rc} \text { Minimize } & c=2 s+2 t+3 u \\ \text { subject to } & s \quad+u \geq 100 \\ 2 s+t & \geq 50 \\ t+u \geq 50 & \\ s \geq 0, t \geq 0, u \geq 0 . \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.