/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text {... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

$$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Maximize } & p=x+5 y \\ \text { subject to } & x+y \leq 6 \\ & -x+3 y \leq 4 \\ & x \geq 0, y \geq 0 . \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The maximum value of the objective function, \(p = x + 5y\), subject to the given constraints occurs at the vertex \((2, 4)\) with a maximum value of \(p=22\).

Step by step solution

01

Graph the constraints and find the feasible region

To graph the constraints, first, set up the coordinate plane. Then, rewrite each inequality as an equation and plot the lines: 1. \(x + y = 6\) 2. \(-x + 3y = 4\) The feasible region is where these constraint lines intersect and satisfy the given conditions \(x \geq 0, y \geq 0\). Shade the area that meets all these conditions.
02

Determine the vertices of the feasible region

Identify the vertices of the feasible region by locating the points where the constraint lines intersect. The vertices are as follows: 1. Intersection of \(x + y = 6\) and \(-x + 3y = 4\): Solve the system of equations to find \((x, y) = (2, 4)\) 2. Intersection of \(x + y = 6\) and the x-axis (x ≥ 0): \((x, y) = (6, 0)\) 3. Intersection of \(-x + 3y = 4\) and the y-axis (y ≥ 0): \((x, y) = (0, \frac{4}{3})\)
03

Evaluate the objective function at each vertex

Substitute each vertex's coordinates into the objective function, p = x + 5y, to find their corresponding values: 1. Vertex (2, 4): \(p(2, 4) = 2 + 5(4) = 22\) 2. Vertex (6, 0): \(p(6, 0) = 6 + 5(0) = 6\) 3. Vertex (0, \frac{4}{3}): \(p(0, \frac{4}{3}) = 0 + 5(\frac{4}{3}) = \frac{20}{3}\)
04

Identify the vertex that gives the maximum value of the objective function

From the evaluations in Step 3, we can see that: - p(2, 4) = 22 - p(6, 0) = 6 - p(0, \frac{4}{3}) = \frac{20}{3} Since 22 is the largest value, the maximum value of the objective function occurs at the vertex (2, 4). Therefore, the solution is \((2, 4)\), with a maximum value of \(p=22\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Feasible Region
In linear programming, the concept of a feasible region is a fundamental aspect. It represents the set of all possible points that satisfy a given set of constraints. These constraints are typically inequalities involving decision variables. For our exercise, the constraints are:
  • \(x + y \leq 6\)
  • \(-x + 3y \leq 4\)
  • \(x \geq 0\)
  • \(y \geq 0\)
To find the feasible region, we first convert these inequalities into equations and then graph them. By plotting the lines represented by the equations and noting on which side of the line the inequality holds true, we determine the area that satisfies all constraints simultaneously.
This shaded area, where all conditions meet, is the feasible region. It's important to ensure that the feasible region is indeed bounded, meaning not extending infinitely, otherwise we cannot proceed to find an optimal solution.
Objective Function
An objective function in linear programming tells us what we want to optimize, which can be either maximizing or minimizing a particular quantity. In this exercise, the objective function we are tasked to maximize is given by:\[ p = x + 5y \]This function represents our goal, based on decision variables \(x\) and \(y\). The coefficients in front of these variables indicate how much each one contributes to the function's overall value.
In our exercise, the challenge is to find the values of \(x\) and \(y\) within the feasible region that make \(p\) as large as possible. To do this, we evaluate the objective function at each vertex of the feasible region.
Constraint Graphing
Graphing constraints involves plotting each of the individual equations derived from inequalities on a coordinate plane. For example, from our exercise:
  • Convert \(x + y \leq 6\) into the line equation \(x + y = 6\).
  • Convert \(-x + 3y \leq 4\) into the line equation \(-x + 3y = 4\).
Each equation becomes a line on the graph, creating boundaries for the feasible region. We shade the side of each line where the inequality holds true, and where all shaded regions overlap corresponds to the feasible region.

The intersections of these lines, especially those lying within the non-negative quadrant (since \(x \geq 0\) and \(y \geq 0\)), form the vertices of the feasible region. Be careful to graph accurately as errors here could lead to incorrect vertices, impacting later steps.
Vertices Evaluation
Once the feasible region has been determined and its vertices identified, the next step is vertices evaluation. This step involves checking each corner point of the feasible area to find the value of the objective function at these points.From our exercise, we identified vertices at:
  • \((2, 4)\)
  • \((6, 0)\)
  • \((0, \frac{4}{3})\)
For each vertex, substitute values into the objective function \(p = x + 5y\) to determine which gives the highest value. This comparison allows us to identify the optimal vertex, which is essential for solving the problem.
Only by evaluating the objective function at each vertex can we be sure of finding the best possible solution within the defined boundaries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are thinking of making your home more energy efficient by replacing some of the light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs, and insulating part or all of your exterior walls. Each compact fluorescent light bulb costs \(\$ 4\) and saves you an average of \(\$ 2\) per year in energy costs, and each square foot of wall insulation costs \(\$ 1\) and saves you an average of \(\$ 0.20\) per year in energy costs. \(^{12}\) Your home has 60 light fittings and 1,100 sq. ft. of uninsulated exterior wall. You can spend no more than \(\$ 1,200\) and would like to save as much per year in energy costs as possible. How many compact fluorescent light bulbs and how many square feet of insulation should you purchase? How much will you save in energy costs per year?

The Scottsville Textile Mill produces several different fabrics on eight dobby looms which operate 24 hours per day and are scheduled for 30 days in the coming month. The Scottsville Textile Mill will produce only Fabric 1 and Fabric 2 during the coming month. Each dobby loom can turn out \(4.63\) yards of either fabric per hour. Assume that there is a monthly demand of 16,000 yards of Fabric 1 and 12,000 yards of Fabric 2. Profits are calculated as 33 d per yard for each fabric produced on the dobby looms. a. Will it be possible to satisfy total demand? b. In the event that total demand is not satisfied, the Scottsville Textile Mill will need to purchase the fabrics from another mill to make up the shortfall. Its profits on resold fabrics ordered from another mill amount to \(20 \mathrm{~d}\) per yard for Fabric 1 and \(16 \mathrm{e}\) per yard for Fabric \(2 .\) How many yards of each fabric should it produce to maximize profits?

\(\nabla\) \mathrm{\\{} T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ~ S c h e d u l i n g ~ W e ~ r e t u r n ~ t o ~ y o u r ~ e x p l o i t s ~ c o - ~ ordinating distribution for the Tubular Ride Boogie Board Company. \({ }^{36}\) You will recall that the company has manufacturing plants in Tucson, Arizona and Toronto, Ontario, and you have been given the job of coordinating distribution of their latest model, the Gladiator, to their outlets in Honolulu and Venice Beach. The Tucson plant can manufacture up to 620 boards per week, while the Toronto plant, beset by labor disputes, can produce no more than 410 Gladiator boards per week. The outlet in Honolulu orders 500 Gladiator boards per week, while Venice Beach orders 530 boards per week. Transportation costs are as follows: Tucson to Honolulu: \(\$ 10 /\) board; Tucson to Venice Beach: \(\$ 5 /\) board; Toronto to Honolulu: \(\$ 20 /\) board; Toronto to Venice Beach: \(\$ 10 /\) board. Your manager has said that you are to be sure to fill all orders and ship the boogie boards at a minimum total transportation cost. How will you do it?

Describe at least one drawback to using the graphical method to solve a linear programming problem arising from a real-life situation.

$$ \begin{aligned} \text { Minimize } & c=3 s+2 t \\ \text { subject to } & s+2 t \geq 20 \\ & 2 s+t \geq 10 \\ & s \geq 0, t \geq 0 . \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.