/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Solve the LP problems. If no opt... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Solve the LP problems. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. Maximize \(\quad \begin{aligned} \quad p=3 x+2 y & \\ \text { subject to } & 0.1 x+0.1 y \geq 0.2 \\ y & \quad x \geq 0, y \geq 0 . \end{aligned}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The feasible region is represented by the intersection of the shaded areas in the first quadrant above the line x+y=2. There is no optimal solution for this LP problem since the feasible region is unbounded, and the objective function p = 3x + 2y will keep increasing indefinitely as x and y increase within the feasible region.

Step by step solution

01

Graph the constraints

Plot the inequality constraints on the coordinate axis. The inequality 0.1x+0.1y ≥ 0.2 can be rewritten as x+y ≥ 2. Therefore, we will plot the line x+y=2 and shade the area above the line to represent the constraint. Also, the constraint y indicates that we should shade the whole positive y-axis. Lastly, x≥0, y≥0 indicates that we should only consider the first quadrant of the coordinate plane where x and y are non-negative. Here is the graph of the constraints: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/8rok2fwebl
02

Find the feasible region

The feasible region is the area where all the constraints are satisfied simultaneously. In the graph, it is represented by the intersection of the shaded areas. In this case, the feasible region is the entire first quadrant of the coordinate plane above the line x+y=2.
03

Check for optimal solution

In LP problems, any maximum or minimum value (if it exists) always occurs at the vertices, or corner points, of the feasible region. In our problem, the feasible region is unbounded, which means that there is no finite maximum value for the objective function. The reason behind this is because, as x and y increase while still remaining in the feasible region, the function p=3x+2y will keep increasing indefinitely.
04

Conclude the result

Since the feasible region is not empty, and the objective function is unbounded in the feasible region, we can conclude that there is no optimal solution for this LP problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Feasible Region
In linear programming, the feasible region is the set of all possible solutions that satisfy all the given constraints. It is the area on a graph where all constraints overlap and hold true. In our particular problem, this region is defined by the constraints of non-negativity of both variables and the inequality, which together form a quadrant on the graph.

To understand how it looks on a graph, consider that each line represents a constraint. The intersection of these lines, usually shaded, illustrates where solutions can potentially lie. In simple terms, any point within this region is a potential solution. The feasible region is crucial because any viable solution to the linear programming problem must fall within this area.

  • It is bounded by inequalities.
  • Any point inside it is a feasible solution.
  • Where it is unbounded, solutions can increase indefinitely within constraints.
In the problem above, the feasible region is all points above the line \(x + y = 2\), within the first quadrant. This region is quite large, suggesting more space for possible solutions.
Optimization
Optimization in linear programming involves finding the maximum or minimum value of an objective function. Our goal in this exercise is to maximize the function \(p = 3x + 2y\). The objective is to identify values for \(x\) and \(y\) that bring the greatest possible output of \(p\), adhering to all problem constraints.

Normally, solutions are located at the vertices of the feasible region. These are the points where constraint lines meet. In bounded regions, it's straightforward to find the optimal point by evaluating the objective function at vertices. But, if the region is unbounded, as in our case, optimization becomes more complex.

  • Solutions are often found at the boundary's corners.
  • Optimization means adjusting values to achieve maximum output.
  • Sometimes, as with unbounded regions, there is no finite optimum.
Here, since the feasible region is unbounded, the function can continually increase as \(x\) and \(y\) grow, meaning there's no singular optimal solution for maximization.
Inequality Constraints
Inequality constraints define limitations or boundaries on the variables in a linear programming problem. They shape the feasible region and guide potential solutions.

In our exercise, the key inequality is \(0.1x + 0.1y \geq 0.2\), which simplifies to \(x + y \geq 2\). This inequality forms a boundary line on the graph, with feasible solutions lying on or above this line.

  • Inequalities restrict the variable values.
  • The shaded area on the graph goes above or below the line, indicating feasible solutions.
  • Non-negativity ((\(x \geq 0\), \(y \geq 0\))) restricts solutions to the first quadrant.
Understanding these constraints helps in identifying where feasible solutions can exist, as well as the shape and limitations of the feasible region. In our case, these constraints ensure solutions lie in a positive realm, informing the optimization and decision-making processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In February 2002, each episode of "Boston Public" was typically seen in \(7.0\) million homes, while each episode of "NYPD Blue" was seen in \(7.8\) million homes. \({ }^{16}\) Your marketing services firm has been hired to promote Gauss Jordan Sneakers by buying at least 30 commercial spots during episodes of "Boston Public" and "NYPD Blue." The cable company running "Boston Public" has quoted a price of \(\$ 2,000\) per spot, while the cable company showing "NYPD Blue" has quoted a price of \(\$ 3,000\) per spot. Gauss Jordan Sneakers' advertising budget for TV commercials is \(\$ 70,000\), and it would like at least \(75 \%\) of the total number of spots to appear on "Boston Public." How many spots should you purchase on each show to reach the most homes?

\(\nabla\) \mathrm{\\{} T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ~ S c h e d u l i n g ~ W e ~ r e t u r n ~ t o ~ y o u r ~ e x p l o i t s ~ c o - ~ ordinating distribution for the Tubular Ride Boogie Board Company. \({ }^{36}\) You will recall that the company has manufacturing plants in Tucson, Arizona and Toronto, Ontario, and you have been given the job of coordinating distribution of their latest model, the Gladiator, to their outlets in Honolulu and Venice Beach. The Tucson plant can manufacture up to 620 boards per week, while the Toronto plant, beset by labor disputes, can produce no more than 410 Gladiator boards per week. The outlet in Honolulu orders 500 Gladiator boards per week, while Venice Beach orders 530 boards per week. Transportation costs are as follows: Tucson to Honolulu: \(\$ 10 /\) board; Tucson to Venice Beach: \(\$ 5 /\) board; Toronto to Honolulu: \(\$ 20 /\) board; Toronto to Venice Beach: \(\$ 10 /\) board. Your manager has said that you are to be sure to fill all orders and ship the boogie boards at a minimum total transportation cost. How will you do it?

Management \(^{20}\) You are the service manager for a supplier of closed- circuit television systems. Your company can provide up to 160 hours per week of technical service for your customers, although the demand for technical service far exceeds this amount. As a result, you have been asked to develop a model to allocate service technicians' time between new customers (those still covered by service contracts) and old customers (whose service contracts have expired). To ensure that new customers are satisfied with your company's service, the sales department has instituted a policy that at least 100 hours per week be allocated to servicing new customers. At the same time, your superiors have informed you that the company expects your department to generate at least \(\$ 1,200\) per week in revenues. Technical service time for new customers generates an average of \(\$ 10\) per hour (because much of the service is still under warranty) and for old customers generates \(\$ 30\) per hour. How many hours per week should you allocate to each type of customer to generate the most revenue?

Can the value of the objective function remain unchanged in passing from one tableau to the next? Explain.

\(\nabla\) Scheduling Because Joe Slim's brother was recently elected to the State Senate, Joe's financial advisement concern, Inside Information Inc., has been doing a booming trade, even though the financial counseling he offers is quite worthless. (None of his seasoned clients pays the slightest attention to his advice.) Slim charges different hourly rates to different categories of individuals: \(\$ 5,000 /\) hour for private citizens, \(\$ 50,000 /\) hour for corporate executives, and \(\$ 10,000 /\) hour for presidents of universities. Due to his taste for leisure, he feels that he can spend no more than 40 hours/week in consultation. On the other hand, Slim feels that it would be best for his intellect were he to devote at least 10 hours of consultation each week to university presidents. However, Slim always feels somewhat uncomfortable dealing with academics, so he would prefer to spend no more than half his consultation time with university presidents. Furthermore, he likes to think of himself as representing the interests of the common citizen, so he wishes to offer at least 2 more hours of his time each week to private citizens than to corporate executives and university presidents combined. Given all these restrictions, how many hours each week should he spend with each type of client in order to maximize his income?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.