Chapter 3: Problem 36
$$ \left[\begin{array}{ll} 0.1 & -3.2 \\ 0.1 & -1.5 \end{array}\right] $$
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 3: Problem 36
$$ \left[\begin{array}{ll} 0.1 & -3.2 \\ 0.1 & -1.5 \end{array}\right] $$
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Evaluate the given expression. Take \(A=\left[\begin{array}{rrr}1 & -1 & 0 \\\ 0 & 2 & -1\end{array}\right], B=\left[\begin{array}{rrr}3 & 0 & -1 \\ 5 & -1 & 1\end{array}\right]\), and \(C=\left[\begin{array}{lll}x & 1 & w \\ z & r & 4\end{array}\right] .\) $$ 2 A-B $$
Translate the given systems of equations into matrix form. \(x+y-z=8\) \(2 x+y+z=4\) \(\frac{3 x}{4}+\frac{z}{2}=1\)
Revenue Karen Sandberg, your competitor in Suburban State U's T-shirt market, has apparently been undercutting your prices and outperforming you in sales. Last week she sold 100 tie dye shirts for \(\$ 10\) each, 50 (low quality) Crew shirts at \(\$ 5\) apiece, and 70 Lacrosse T-shirts for \(\$ 8\) each. Use matrix operations to calculate her total revenue for the week.
If \(A\) and \(B\) are \(2 \times 3\) matrices and \(A=B\), what can you say about \(A-B ?\) Explain.
I Population Movement In 2006, the population of the United States, broken down by regions, was \(55.1\) million in the Northeast, \(66.2\) million in the Midwest, \(110.0\) million in the South, and \(70.0\) million in the West. \({ }^{19}\) The matrix \(P\) below shows the population movement during the period 2006 \(2007 .\) (Thus, \(98.92 \%\) of the population in the Northeast stayed there, while \(0.17 \%\) of the population in the Northeast moved to the Midwest, and so on.) \(\begin{array}{ccll}\text { To } & \text { To } & \text { To } & \text { To } \\\ \text { NE } & \text { MW } & \text { S } & \text { W }\end{array}\) \(P=\begin{aligned}&\text { From NE } \\\&\text { From MW } \\\&\text { From S } \\\&\text { From W }\end{aligned}\left[\begin{array}{llll}0.9892 & 0.0017 & 0.0073 & 0.0018 \\ 0.0010 & 0.9920 & 0.0048 & 0.0022 \\ 0.0018 & 0.0024 & 0.9934 & 0.0024 \\ 0.0008 & 0.0033 & 0.0045 & 0.9914\end{array}\right]\) Set up the 2006 population figures as a row vector. Assuming that these percentages also describe the population movements from 2005 to 2006 , show how matrix inversion and multiplication allow you to compute the population in each region in 2005 . (Round all answers to the nearest \(0.1\) million.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.