/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 479 From the sample of data \(5,8,2,... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

From the sample of data \(5,8,2,1\), compute the standard deviation of the sample.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample standard deviation of the data set \(5, 8, 2, 1\) is approximately \(3.16\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the mean (\(\bar{x}\)) of the data set

First, we need to calculate the mean of the data set. To do this, we add the data points together and divide the result by the number of data points: \[\bar{x} = \frac{1}{4}(5+8+2+1) = \frac{16}{4} = 4\]
02

Find the deviation of each data point from the mean

Next, we find the deviation of each data point from the mean by subtracting the mean from each data point: \[5-4 = 1\] \[8-4 = 4\] \[2-4 = -2\] \[1-4 = -3\]
03

Square each deviation and sum them up

Now, we square the deviations and sum them up: \[(1)^2 + (4)^2 + (-2)^2 + (-3)^2 = 1 + 16 + 4 + 9 = 30\]
04

Divide the sum by \(n-1\) (degrees of freedom)

We divide the sum of the squared deviations by \(n-1\) (the degrees of freedom), where n is the number of data points: \[\frac{30}{4-1} = \frac{30}{3} = 10\]
05

Take the square root of the result

Finally, we take the square root of the result to get the sample standard deviation: \[s = \sqrt{10} \approx 3.16\] The sample standard deviation of the data set is approximately 3.16.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the sum of the expected value of two discrete random variables with joint density \(\mathrm{f}(\mathrm{x}, \mathrm{y})\) is equal to the expected value of the sum of these two random variables. That is \(\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{X}+\mathrm{Y})=\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{X})+\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{Y})\)

Consider the following data obtained from testing the breaking strength of ceramic tile manufactured by a new cheaper process: \(20,42,18,21,22,35,19,18,26,20,21\), \(32,22,20,24\) Suppose that experience with the old process produced a median of 25 . Then test the hypothesis \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) : \(\mathrm{M}=25\) against \(\mathrm{H}_{1}: \mathrm{M}<25\)

Suppose we want to compare 2 treatments for curing acne (pimples). Suppose, too, that for practical reasons we are obliged to use a presenting sample of patients. We might then decide to alternate the 2 treatments strictly according to the order in which the patients arrive \((\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and so on). Let us agree to measure the cure in terms of weeks to reach \(90 \%\) improvement (this may prove more satisfactory than awaiting \(100 \%\) cure, for some patients, may not be completely cured by either treatment, and many patients might not report back for review when they are completely cured). This design would ordinarily call for Wilcoxon's Sum of Ranks Test, but there is one more thing to be considered: severity of the disease. For it could happen that a disproportionate number of mild cases might end up, purely by chance, in one of the treatment groups, which could bias the results in favor of this group, even if there was no difference between the 2 treatments. It would clearly be better to compare the 2 treatments on comparable cases, and this can be done by stratifying the samples. Suppose we decide to group all patients into one or other of 4 categories \- mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. Then all the mild cases would be given the 2 treatments alternatively and likewise with the other groups. Given the results tabulated below (in order of size, not of their actual occurrence), is the evidence sufficient to say that one treatment is better than the other? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Category } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment A } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment B } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { (I) Mild } & 2 & 2 \\ & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \text { (II) Moderate } & 3 & 4 \\ & 5 & 6 \\ & 6 & 7 \\ & 10 & 9 \\ \hline \text { (III) Severe } & 6 & 9 \\ & 8 & 14 \\ & 11 & 14 \\ \hline \text { (IV) Very severe } & 8 & 12 \\ & 10 & 14 \\ & 11 & 15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Let the random variable \(\mathrm{X}\) represent the number of defective radios in a shipment of four radios to a local appliance store. Assume that each radio is equally likely to be defective or non-defective, hence the probability that a radio is defective is \(\mathrm{p}=1 / 2\). Also assume whether or not each radio is defective or non-defective is indipendent of the status of the other radios. Find the expected number of defective radios.

Let \(\mathrm{X}\) be a normally distributed random variable representing the hourly wage in a certain craft. The mean of the hourly wage is \(\$ 4.25\) and the standard deviation is \(\$ .75 .\) (a) What percentage of workers receive hourly wages between \(\$ 3.50\) and \(\$ 4.90 ?\) (b) What hourly wage represents the 95 th percentile?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.