/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 The Fraud Triangle Each of the f... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Fraud Triangle Each of the following is part of the fraud triangle except: a. pressure. b. opportunity. c. concealment. d. rationalization. L01

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option c, concealment, is not part of the fraud triangle.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Fraud Triangle

The fraud triangle is a model that explains the factors that lead to fraudulent behavior. It consists of three components: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization.
02

Analyze Each Option

Review each option understanding which ones are part of the fraud triangle: a. Pressure - this represents motivation or stress driving someone to commit fraud. b. Opportunity - this is the perceived ability to carry out fraud without being caught. c. Concealment - this is methods used to hide the fraudulent act. d. Rationalization - this refers to the justification individuals use to convince themselves their actions are acceptable.
03

Identify the Odd One Out

Compare the components in the fraud triangle to the given options. Concealment (c) is not a part of the original fraud triangle, while pressure, opportunity, and rationalization are.
04

Provide the Correct Answer

Determine which option is not part of the fraud triangle. The correct answer is concealment (c).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pressure: The Driving Force Behind Fraud
Pressure is one of the key components of the fraud triangle and represents the motivation or stress that compels someone to commit fraud. This pressure can take many forms. It might be financial, driven by personal or business-related needs. For example, someone may feel pressured due to overwhelming debts, or to meet unrealistic financial goals set by their organization.
Pressure can also arise from non-financial sources, such as the need to maintain status or meet high expectations from others. Regardless of the origin, it's this pressure that often pushes individuals towards deceitful actions.
  • Financial Pressure: Common among individuals facing financial difficulties or looking to improve their financial standing quickly.
  • Performance Pressure: Can occur in high-stakes environments where success is often measured by financial results.
  • Social Pressure: Arises from the desire to conform to societal expectations or to gain approval from peers or family.
Understanding how pressure manifests is crucial in identifying potential fraudulent behavior before it happens.
Opportunity: The Doorway to Fraud
Opportunity in the fraud triangle refers to the circumstances that allow someone to commit fraud. If there's no opportunity, even the most pressured individual may not resort to fraud. Opportunities often arise from weak internal controls within organizations, lack of oversight, or the complexity of certain operations that make monitoring difficult.
An effective way to minimize these opportunities is by establishing strong internal controls, conducting regular audits, and encouraging an ethical work environment. This helps deter potential fraudulent activities by making it more difficult to disguise deceitful actions.
  • Internal Control Weakness: A common loophole that may inadvertently allow fraud to occur.
  • Lax Supervision: Lack of oversight can make it easier for fraudulent actions to go unnoticed.
  • Complex Processes: In industries where processes are complex, fraud may be less visible and harder to detect.
Addressing opportunity involves implementing checks that create awareness and accountability among individuals within an organization.
Rationalization: Justifying Fraudulent Actions
Rationalization is the cognitive process by which individuals justify their fraudulent actions. It's the third element of the fraud triangle and plays a critical role in whether a pressured person, given the opportunity, will ultimately engage in fraud.
People typically rationalize their actions by convincing themselves that what they’re doing is not wrong. They might tell themselves that they are "borrowing" the money and will repay it later, or that they are simply taking what they are owed due to perceived unfair treatment.
The mind's role in justifying actions is powerful and can blur ethical boundaries, making fraudulent acts seem acceptable.
  • Perceived Entitlement: A common rationalization where individuals believe they deserve what they are taking due to various reasons.
  • Denial of Responsibility: People may avoid accepting the consequences of their actions by shifting blame or denying culpability.
  • Minimization of Judgement: Some may view their actions as minor sins in the grand scheme of things.
Understanding rationalization helps us see how individuals cross ethical lines and underscores the need for instilling strong values and ethical standards within a culture or organization.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Carter Manufacturing Company makes a variety of consumer products. For the year just ended (and the two prior years), sales of private-label product to Mega-Mart (1,200 stores nationwide) have made up 60 to 65 percent of total sales. On December 31 of the year just ended, Mega-Mart informed Carter that it would be buying all private-label products from another manufacturer under a five-year contract. Losing this business will result in a 50 to 55 percent reduction in total gross profit for Carter. a. What is the going concern concept and how does it apply to this situation? b. How should the full disclosure principle be applied when preparing the annual report for the year just ended? c. What is the independent auditor's responsibility in this situation?

Operational Audits Explain the nature of an operational audit.

What is a bank reconciliation? a. A formal financial statement that lists all of a fim's bank account balances b. A merger of two banks that previously were competitors c. A statement sent monthly by a bank to a depositor that lists all deposits, checks paid, and other credits and charges to the depositor's account for the month d. A schedule that accounts for differences between a firm's cash balance as shown on its bank statement and the balance shown in its general ledger Cash account

Bank Reconciliation The Seattle First Company's bank statement for the month of September indicated a balance of \(\$ 13,375\). The company's cash account in the general ledger showed a balance of \(\$ 10,030\) on September 30. Other relevant information includes the following: 1\. Deposits in transit on September 30 total \(\$ 9,850 .\) 2\. The bank statement shows a debit memorandum for a \(\$ 95\) check printing charge. 3\. Check number 238 payable to Simon Company was recorded in the accounting records for \(\$ 496\) and cleared the bank for this same amount. A review of the records indicated that the Simon account now has a \(\$ 72\) credit balance and the check to them should have been \(\$ 568\). 4\. Outstanding checks as of September 30 totaled \(\$ 11,600\). 5\. Check No. 276 was correctly written and paid by the bank for \(\$ 574\). The check was recorded in the accounting records as a debit to accounts payable and a credit to cash for \(\$ 754\). 6\. The bank returned an NSF check in the amount of \(\$ 1,110\). 7\. The bank included a credit memorandum for \(\$ 2,620\) representing a collection of a customer"s note. The principal portion was \(\$ 2,400\) and the interest portion was \(\$ 220\). The interest had not been accrued. Required a. Prepare the September bank reconciliation for Seattle First Company. b. Prepare any necessary adjusting entries.

Which of the following is not one of the three elements of the fraud triangle? a. Pressure b. Rationalization c. Embezzlement d. Opportunity

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.