/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 Dolo's Building Block Company us... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Dolo's Building Block Company uses LIFO costing and reports the following information in a footnote to its financial statements: "If Dolo had used FIFO costing during 2000 , the beginning and ending inventories would have been higher by \(\$ 50\) million and \(\$ 70\) million, respectively."a. Determine how much higher or lower Dolo's cost of goods sold would be during 2000 if the firm had used FIFO in costing its inventories. b. Assume that all of Dolo's income is taxed at \(40 \%\). How much higher or lower would Dolo's income tax expense be during 2000 if the firm had used FIFO? c. What was Dolo's tax savings for the year due to the use of LIFO? d. What was Dolo's cumulative tax savings through the end of the year 2000 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The cost of goods sold would have been $20 million lower if Dolo used FIFO. b. Dolo's income tax expense would have been $8 million higher if the firm had used FIFO. c. Dolo's tax savings for the year due to the use of LIFO is $8 million. d. Dolo's cumulative tax savings through the end of the year 2000 is also $8 million.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the difference in COGS

To identify how much higher or lower Dolo's cost of goods sold would be during 2000 if the firm had used FIFO, calculate the difference between the beginning and ending inventories under the FIFO system. As mentioned, the beginning and ending inventories would have been higher by $50 million and $70 million, respectively, under FIFO. Therefore, the difference is $70 million (Ending) - $50 million (Beginning) = $20 million. Thus, under FIFO, the COGS would have been $20 million lower.
02

Calculate the difference in income tax expense

To find out the change in income tax expense, apply the tax rate to the change in COGS. In this case, the tax rate is 40%. So the impact on pre-tax income is $20 million, which is the change in COGS. Multiplying the change in pre-tax income by the tax rate gives us $20 million * 40% = $8 million. Hence, the income tax expense would have been $8 million higher under FIFO.
03

Determine the annual tax savings due to LIFO

The annual tax savings due to the use of LIFO is just the amount that would have been additionally paid in taxes under FIFO, which we found out in the previous step. Therefore, the annual tax savings in 2000 due to the use of LIFO is $8 million.
04

Calculate the cumulative tax savings

The cumulative tax savings through the end of the year 2000 is simply the tax savings for that particular year as no prior tax savings were mentioned. Thus, the cumulative tax savings is also $8 million.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
The Cost of Goods Sold, often shortened to COGS, represents the direct costs associated with producing goods sold by a company. Calculating the COGS is crucial, as it directly impacts a company's profitability and financial health. For Dolo's Building Block Company, transitioning from Last In, First Out (LIFO) to First In, First Out (FIFO) would have reduced their COGS by $20 million in 2000. This adjustment is due to the ending and beginning inventories being higher by $70 million and $50 million respectively under FIFO. Understanding COGS:
  • It includes expenses such as raw materials and direct labor costs tied to production.
  • It excludes indirect costs such as sales and marketing expenses.
When a company switches inventory accounting methods, like from LIFO to FIFO, COGS is affected because the order in which inventory is taken into account changes, thus impacting the cost calculation.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense is the total amount of taxes payable on pre-tax earnings and is significantly influenced by the accounting method used. For Dolo's, the switch from LIFO to FIFO would have increased their income tax expense by $8 million. This increase stems from the corresponding $20 million decrease in COGS under FIFO, thereby increasing Dolo's pre-tax income by the same amount. Key Points About Income Tax Expense:
  • It's affected by the company's tax rate, which for Dolo was 40%.
  • A reduction in COGS leads to higher taxable income, increasing the tax expense.
Through this lens, it's clear that the method of inventory accounting can have significant implications on a company's tax obligations.
Annual Tax Savings
Annual tax savings refer to the reduction in taxes a company enjoys due to choosing a particular accounting method. In the case of LIFO versus FIFO, using LIFO resulted in tax savings for Dolo's Building Block Company. The annual tax savings for the year 2000 from maintaining their LIFO method amounted to $8 million since opting for FIFO would have inflated their tax expense by that amount. Why Annual Tax Savings Matter:
  • They provide additional cash resources for the company to reinvest or save.
  • Tax savings can improve company profitability by reducing the overall tax burden.
Thus, choosing an inventory accounting method like LIFO can be financially beneficial in terms of reducing taxable income and securing cash flow advantages.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe the concept of factoring accounts receivable. If necessary, conduct further research in a finance text to determine what functions a factor performs. Consider the following factoring issues: a. Why would a company sell its receivables to a factor? b. If these receivables were 180 days old, why might a factor not be interested in purchasing them? c. Who bears the risk in factoring? How can these risks be shifted? d. What industries might use factoring more extensively (than other industries)? e. Why wouldn't a convenience store or a discount store be able to factor its accounts receivable, even if it had such receivables?

Describe five general types of current assets. Why do you think managers and analysts might prefer that firms generally use these categories and definitions for current assets?

Classify each of the following items as either a cash or a noncash item. a. Savings accounts b. Postage stamps c. Traveler's checks d. Handwritten notes from employees promising to repay the firm for lunch money taken from the cash register e. Travel advances provided to employees f. Cash in a drawer waiting to be deposited at the bank g. Customers' checks that have arrived in today's mail h. A petty cash fund of \(\$ 50\) that is rarely used i. Foreign currency j. Foreign coins k. U.S. savings bonds 1\. 100 shares of IBM common stock.

Describe how LIFO provides better matching of revenues and expenses than FIFO.Why would such an attribute be desirable for income measurement?

Under what circumstances can accounts receivable be turned into cash, almost "overnight"?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.