/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Firm A has an accounts receivabl... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Firm A has an accounts receivable balance of 126,000 dollars and a balance in its allowance for uncollectible accounts of 29,000 dollars. Contrast this situation with Firm B, which has corresponding balances of \(\$ 963,000\) and \(\$ 865,000\). Which firm is riskier? Why? Which firm do you think is doing a better job of managing its accounts receivable? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Firm B is riskier because it has a higher ratio of potential uncollectible accounts to accounts receivable. Firm A is doing a better job managing its accounts receivable due to its lower ratio.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Risk Ratio for Firm A

Firstly, divide the allowance for uncollectible accounts of Firm A (\$29,000) by its accounts receivable balance (\$126,000). The calculation is \(29,000/126,000 = 0.23\). It means that Firm A estimates that 23% of their accounts receivable will likely not be collected.
02

Calculate the Risk Ratio for Firm B

Use the same approach, divide the allowance for uncollectible accounts of Firm B (\$865,000) by its accounts receivable balance (\$963,000). This division results in \(865,000/963,000 = 0.898\), so Firm B is expecting that approximately 90% of their accounts receivable will not be collected.
03

Compare Risks

Comparing the ratios, it is evident that Firm B expects more of its accounts receivable not to be collected, making it riskier.
04

Assess Account Management

Regarding the management of accounts receivable, a lower ratio typically indicates better management as it means the business is successful in collecting the owed amounts. Therefore, Firm A seems to manage its accounts receivable more effectively having a lower ratio than Firm B.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Risk Assessment in Accounting
Risk assessment in accounting is crucial for evaluating potential financial setbacks. It helps firms identify areas of vulnerability in their financial reporting and decision-making processes.
In the context of accounts receivable management, risk assessment involves analyzing how likely it is for accounts to remain unpaid. This assessment can be informed by calculating specific ratios, such as the risk ratio.
  • The risk ratio is calculated by dividing the allowance for uncollectible accounts by the total accounts receivable.
  • A higher risk ratio signifies a greater likelihood of accounts remaining uncollected, indicating higher risk.
In the exercise, Firm B has a risk ratio of approximately 90%, meaning a significant portion of its accounts receivable are expected to be uncollectible. Firm A, with a risk ratio of 23%, is in a safer position. Firms need to keep their risk ratios low to enhance financial stability and predictability.
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
The allowance for uncollectible accounts represents an estimation of the amount of accounts receivable that a business does not expect to collect.
This balance is crucial for fair and honest financial reporting as it adjusts accounts receivable to reflect a more realistic view of potential cash inflows.
  • Creating an allowance helps align revenue reporting with the actual value expected to be received.
  • It also impacts the balance sheet by reducing the net accounts receivable amount.
In our example, Firm B has set aside a significant allowance (around 90% of its accounts receivable), suggesting a lack of confidence in collecting payments. This could reflect on customer credit policies or economic conditions affecting their clientele. Conversely, Firm A has a lower allowance, indicating either a better credit policy or a higher rate of successful collection efforts.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Financial ratio analysis involves using quantitative measures to gauge a company’s operational efficiency, profitability, and financial health.
These ratios are instrumental in understanding a company's performance relative to its peers.
  • For accounts receivable, the risk ratio is a specific example of a financial ratio used to assess collection efficiency.
  • Analyzing these ratios helps stakeholders evaluate how well a company manages cash flow and credit risk.
In this context, Firm A's lower risk ratio suggests efficient management of accounts receivable compared to Firm B. A better financial ratio typically indicates healthier financial practices and potentially better operational performance. These analyses allow companies to strategize improvements in managing credit and collections, ensuring stronger financial outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Spit-Spot Cleaners, Inc., recognized the following events related to customer accounts receivable during the firm's first year of operation: 1\. Sales on credit totaled 4,000,000 dollars for the year. 2\. The firm estimated that \(2 \%\) of its credit sales would ultimately prove to be uncollectible. 3\. Cash collections of accounts receivable totaled 3,480,000 dollars during the year. 4\. The firm wrote off uncollectible accounts of \(\$ 75,000\). a. Determine the effects of each of these events on the following financial statement items: Accounts receivable (net of allowance) Total assets Revenues Expenses b. Determine the firm's balance of accounts receivable (net) at December 31 (year-end).

The Atlas Tile Company has an accounts receivable balance at December 31 of 376,000 .dollars Its allowance for uncollectible accounts, before adjustment, has a balance of 37,000 dollas . Credit sales for Atlas, for the year just ended, were 2,700,000 dollars Using its credit history, Atlas decides to increase its allowance account by \(3 \%\) of credit sales.a. Calculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts as a percentage of the accounts receivable ratio, both before and after the \(3 \%\) adjustment was made. b. Now assume that the firm's auditors have conducted an aging analysis and recommend that the allowance account balance be increased to \(\$ 96,000 .\) Recalculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts as a percentage of accounts receivable ratio after this alternative adjustment has been made. c. Compare and contrast these results.

Tom Hanky, a financial analyst specializing in the toy industry, has provided the following comments concerning the 1999 financial statements of Toys-U- Must:Toys-U-Must began operations in 1999 and uses the LIFO method in costing its inventories. Because the typical firm in the industry uses FIFO costing, it is desirable to adjust the company's financial statements"as if \(^{\prime \prime}\) FIFO costing had been used. Footnotes to the financial statements reveal that the use of FIFO would increase the company's inventory valuation by 150 million dollars, and that the company's income is taxed at \(40 \%\) .Based on Hanky's comments, explain how cach of the following items would be adjusted in Toys-U-Must's 1999 financial statements: a. Inventory b. Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) c. Gross margin d. Income tax expense e. Net income f. Retained earnings g. At the end of 2000 , Toys-U-Must's financial statement footnotes reveal that the use of FIFO costing would increase the company's ending inventory valuation by \(\$ 200\) million (the effects on the beginning inventory were described above). Explain how each of the following items would be adjusted in order to convert the company's reported accounts "as if" the firm had used FIFO costing during 2000.1. Inventory 2\. Working capital 3\. Gross margin 4 . Income tax expense 5\. Net income 6\. Retained earnings

Why would a firm extend credit to its customers? Identify some firms that rarely offer credit terms. How have bank credit cards changed some of these credit practices? Identify some industries where credit is an essential part of daily business.

Under what circumstances can accounts receivable be turned into cash, almost "overnight"?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.