/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 In 2006 the United Kingdom gener... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In 2006 the United Kingdom generated approximately 81 terawatt-hours of nuclear energy for a population of about 60.6 million on 94,525 miles \(^{2}\). In the same year the United States generated approximately 780 terawatt-hours of nuclear energy for a population of about 300 million on 3,675,031 miles \(^{2}\). A terawatt is \(10^{12}\) watts. a. How many terawatt-hours is the United Kingdom generating per person? How many terawatt-hours is it generating per square mile? Express each in scientific notation. b. How many terawatt-hours is the United States generating per person? How many terawatt-hours are we generating per square mile? Express each in scientific notation. c. How much nuclear energy is being generated in the United Kingdom per square mile relative to the United States? d. Write a brief statement comparing the relative magnitude of generation of nuclear power per person in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The UK generates approximately \(1.34 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \) and \(8.57 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2 \), while the US generates approximately \(2.6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \) and \(2.12 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2 \). The UK generates about 4.04 times more nuclear energy per square mile than the US.

Step by step solution

01

- Find terawatt-hours per person in the UK

To find the terawatt-hours per person for the United Kingdom, divide the total terawatt-hours generated by the population: \( \text{Per capita} = \frac{81 \text{ TWh}}{60.6 \text{ million people}} \) Convert the population to scientific notation: \(60.6 \text{ million people} = 60.6 \times 10^6 \) Then, \[ \frac{81}{60.6 \times 10^6} = 1.34 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \]
02

- Find terawatt-hours per square mile in the UK

To find the terawatt-hours per square mile in the United Kingdom, divide the total terawatt-hours by the total area: \( \text{Per square mile} = \frac{81 \text{ TWh}}{94,525 \text{ mi}^2} \) Convert the area to scientific notation: \(94,525 \text{ mi}^2 = 9.4525 \times 10^4 \text{ mi}^2 \) Then, \[ \frac{81}{9.4525 \times 10^4} = 8.57 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2 \]
03

- Find terawatt-hours per person in the US

To find the terawatt-hours per person for the United States, divide the total terawatt-hours generated by the population: \( \text{Per capita} = \frac{780 \text{ TWh}}{300 \text{ million people}} \) Convert the population to scientific notation: \(300 \text{ million people} = 300 \times 10^6 \) Then, \[ \frac{780}{300 \times 10^6} = 2.6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \]
04

- Find terawatt-hours per square mile in the US

To find the terawatt-hours per square mile in the United States, divide the total terawatt-hours by the total area: \( \text{Per square mile} = \frac{780 \text{ TWh}}{3,675,031 \text{ mi}^2} \) Convert the area to scientific notation: \(3,675,031 \text{ mi}^2 = 3.675031 \times 10^6 \text{ mi}^2 \) Then, \[ \frac{780}{3.675031 \times 10^6} = 2.12 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2 \]
05

- UK relative to US in nuclear energy per square mile

To compare how much nuclear energy is being generated per square mile in the UK relative to the US, divide the UK value by the US value: \[ \frac{8.57 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2}{2.12 \times 10^{-1} \text{ TWh/mi}^2} = 4.04 \] So, the UK generates around 4.04 times more nuclear energy per square mile than the US.
06

- Compare nuclear power generation per person

Compare the per capita generation of nuclear power between the UK and the US: The UK generates \(1.34 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \) while the US generates \(2.6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ TWh/person} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

scientific notation
Scientific notation is a method for expressing very large or very small numbers in a more concise form. It involves representing numbers as a product of a coefficient (a number between 1 and 10) and a power of ten. For example, 81 terawatt-hours can be expressed as \(81 \times 10^{12}\) watts since a terawatt is \(10^{12}\) watts.
This notation is incredibly useful in science and engineering because it simplifies calculations and makes it easier to read and compare large values. For instance, representing the populations of the UK (60.6 million) and the US (300 million) in scientific notation would be \(60.6 \times 10^6\) and \(300 \times 10^6\), respectively. This makes it easier to manage and manipulate these numbers in further calculations.
per capita energy generation
Per capita energy generation refers to the amount of energy produced per person. It's calculated by dividing the total energy generated by the population size. This metric is important because it provides an average measure of energy availability or usage for each individual in a given population.
For the UK, the per capita nuclear energy generation in 2006 was calculated by dividing 81 TWh by the population of 60.6 million. Expressing this in scientific notation, we get \(60.6 \times 10^6\), resulting in approximately \(1.34 \times 10^{-3}\) TWh per person.
For the US, with a nuclear energy generation of 780 TWh and a population of 300 million, using scientific notation gives us \(300 \times 10^6\), resulting in approximately \(2.6 \times 10^{-3}\) TWh per person. This metric helps compare energy sufficiency and accessibility across different regions.
area-based energy generation
Area-based energy generation, or energy density, measures the amount of energy produced per unit area, typically per square mile. This helps in understanding how much energy a specific area generates, offering insights into the efficiency and concentration of energy generation.
For the UK, the total nuclear energy generation was 81 TWh over an area of 94,525 square miles. In scientific notation, 94,525 square miles is \(9.4525 \times 10^4\), resulting in approximately \(8.57 \times 10^{-1}\) TWh per square mile.
For the US, with 780 TWh generated over 3,675,031 square miles, the area in scientific notation is \(3.675031 \times 10^6\), resulting in approximately \(2.12 \times 10^{-1}\) TWh per square mile. This metric is crucial for assessing the geographic distribution and efficiency of energy production facilities.
comparative analysis
Comparative analysis involves examining different sets of data to identify patterns, differences, or similarities. In this exercise, we compare the nuclear energy generation data of the UK and the US to understand their efficiency and scale.
When comparing the per capita nuclear energy generation, we find that the US generates approximately \(2.6 \times 10^{-3}\) TWh per person, which is almost double that of the UK at \(1.34 \times 10^{-3}\) TWh per person. This indicates higher individual energy production in the US.
In terms of area-based generation, the UK generates about \(8.57 \times 10^{-1}\) TWh per square mile, while the US generates \(2.12 \times 10^{-1}\) TWh per square mile. This shows that the UK produces about 4.04 times more nuclear energy per square mile compared to the US, highlighting a higher concentration of nuclear energy production in the UK. By comparing these metrics, we can better understand discrepancies in energy policies, infrastructure, and resource utilization between different regions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Water boils (changes from a liquid to a gas) at 373 kelvins. The temperature of the core of the sun is 20 million kelvins. By how many orders of magnitude is the sun's core hotter than the boiling temperature of water?

a. Generate a small table of values and plot the function \(y=|x|\) for \(-5 \leq x \leq 5\) b. On the same graph, plot the function \(y=|x-2|\).

Simplify each expression using two different methods, and then compare your answers. Method I: Simplify inside the parentheses first, and then apply the exponent rule outside the parentheses. Method II: Apply the exponent rule outside the parentheses, and then simplify. a. \(\left(\frac{m^{2} n^{3}}{m n}\right)^{2}\) b. \(\left(\frac{2 a^{2} b^{3}}{a b^{2}}\right)^{4}\)

The National Institutes of Health guidelines suggest that adults over 20 should have a body mass index, or BMI, under \(25 .\) This index is created according to the formula $$ \mathrm{BMI}=\frac{\text { weight in kilograms }}{(\text { height in meters })^{2}} $$ a. Given that 1 kilogram \(=2.2\) pounds, and 1 meter \(=39.37\) inches, calculate the body mass index of President George W. Bush, who is 6 feet tall and in 2003 weighed 194 pounds. According to the guidelines, how would you describe his weight? b. Most Americans don't use the metric system. So in order to make the BMI easier to use, convert the formula to an equivalent one using weight in pounds and height in inches. Check your new formula by using Bush's weight and height, and confirm that you get the same BMI. c. The following excerpt from the article "America Fattens Up" (The New York Times, October 20,1996 ) describes a very complicated process for determining your BMI: To estimate your body mass index you first need to convert your weight into kilograms by multiplying your weight in pounds by 0.45. Next, find your height in inches. Multiply this number by 0.254 to get meters. Multiply that number by itself and then divide the result into your weight in kilograms. Too complicated? Internet users can get an exact calculation at http://141.106.68.17/bsa.acgl. Can you do a better job of describing the process? d. A letter to the editor from Brent Kigner, of Oneonta, N.Y., in response to the New York Times article says: Math intimidates partly because it is often made unnecessarily daunting. Your article "American Fattens \(U p "\) comvolutes the procedure for calculating the Body Mass Index so much that you suggest readers retreat to the Internet. In fact, the formula is simple: Multiply your weight in pounds by 703 , then divide by the square of your height in inches. If the result is above \(25,\) you weigh too much. Is Brent Kigner right?

Radio waves, sent from a broadcast station and picked up by the antenna of your radio, are a form of electromagnetic (EM) radiation, as are microwaves, X-rays, and visible, infrared, and ultraviolet light. They all travel at the speed of light. Electromagnetic radiation can be thought of as oscillations like the vibrating strings of a violin or guitar or like ocean swells that have crests and troughs. The distance between the crest or peak of one wave and the next is called the wavelength. The number of times a wave crests per minute, or per second for fast-oscillating waves, is called its frequency. Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional: the longer the wavelength, the lower the frequency, and vice versa-the faster the oscillation, the shorter the wavelength. For radio waves and other \(\mathrm{EM}\), the number of oscillations per second of a wave is measured in hertz, after the German scientist who first demonstrated that electrical waves could transmit information across space. One cycle or oscillation per second equals 1 hertz \((\mathrm{Hz})\). For the following exercise you may want to find an old radio or look on a stereo tuner at the AM and FM radio bands. You may see the notation \(\mathrm{kHz}\) beside the AM band and MHz beside the FM band. AM radio waves oscillate at frequencies measured in the kilohertz range, and FM radio waves oscillate at frequencies measured in the megahertz range. a. The Boston FM rock station WBCN transmits at \(104.1 \mathrm{MHz}\). Write its frequency in hertz using scientific notation. b. The Boston AM radio news station WBZ broadcasts at 1030 \(\mathrm{kHz}\). Write its frequency in hertz using scientific notation. The wavelength \(\lambda\) (Greek lambda) in meters and frequency \(\mu\) (Greek mu) in oscillations per second are related by the formula \(\lambda=\frac{c}{\mu}\) where \(c\) is the speed of light in meters per second. c. Estimate the wavelength of the WBCN FM radio transmission. d. Estimate the wavelength of the WBZ AM radio transmission. e. Compare your answers in parts (c) and (d), using orders of magnitude, with the length of a football field (approximately 100 meters).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.