/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 If the standard quota of state \... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If the standard quota of state \(X\) is 35.41 , then which of the following apportionments to state \(X\) is (or are) possible under Jefferson's method? (a) 34,35 or 36 (b) 34,35,36 or 37 (c) 35 only (d) 36 only (e) 35,36 or 37

Short Answer

Expert verified
The possible apportionments to state X under Jefferson's method are option (a) 35 and option (c) 35

Step by step solution

01

Understand Jefferson's method

Jefferson's method of determining representation for the states in the House carries out an operation that rounds down the standard quota calculated. This is a critical understanding for successful solution of this problem.
02

Apply Jefferson's method to given options

Analyse each given option in light of the understanding of Jefferson's method to confirm or eliminate each as a potential answer.
03

Evaluate option (a)

Option (a) includes the values 34, 35 and 36. Given that Jefferson's method allows for rounding down the standard quota, the values of 34 and 36 can be eliminated. The value of 35 would be possible under Jefferson's method
04

Evaluate option (b)

Option (b) includes additional value of 37. However, Jefferson's method only allows for rounding down the standard quota (to 35), so the values of 34, 36 and 37 can be eliminated.
05

Evaluate options (c), (d) and (e)

Option (c) includes the only possible value: 35, hence it is a possible answer. Options (d) and (e) can be eliminated because they both contain values that are greater than the standard quota, which are not possible under Jefferson's method.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Apportionment
Apportionment refers to the method of allocating a fixed number of seats or resources among different groups, often based on population or another measure. In the context of government and politics, it's commonly used to determine how many representatives each state or region gets in a legislative body, such as the United States House of Representatives.
A fair and efficient apportionment ensures that representation is as close to equal as possible, reflecting the true population distribution. Different methods can be employed to achieve this balance, each with its own rules and implications.
In mathematical terms, apportionment can be quite complex as it aims to provide a proportional distribution, often requiring careful calculations and rounding methods to ensure fair outcomes.
Rounding Methods
Rounding methods are crucial when it comes to apportionment because you can't assign a fractional seat. To deal with this, various rounding techniques are applied to apportion seats as evenly as possible.
Several rounding methods are used in apportionment, such as:
  • Round Down (Flooring): This method always rounds down to the nearest whole number.
  • Round Up (Ceiling): This method rounds up to the nearest whole number.
  • Conventional Rounding: Round up if the fractional part is 0.5 or more, otherwise round down.
In Jefferson's method, the standard quota is always rounded down, which often leads to fewer changes in representation for less populated states. This can ensure more stable representation numbers but might also introduce slight bias towards larger states or groups.
House of Representatives Apportionment
The apportionment of the House of Representatives in the United States is a key application of apportionment concepts. With a fixed number of seats available, currently 435, each state's representation needs to be in proportion to its population.
This apportionment is revisited after each census, which occurs every ten years, to account for population changes. Adjustments ensure that each citizen's vote carries as equal weight as possible.
Various methods have been used throughout history for apportioning these seats, including methods of greatest divisors like Jefferson's method, which tend to favor larger states by rounding down and allocating extra seats using a divisor that adjusts proportionally.
Standard Quota
The standard quota is a fundamental concept in apportionment, representing the number of seats a state should receive based purely on its population proportion, before any rounding occurs.
Calculating the standard quota involves determining how many people would ideally be represented by a seat. This is done by dividing the total population by the total number of seats, and then using this ratio to determine how many seats a particular population should logically receive.
In practical terms, support for democracy and fairness hinges on the accuracy of this measure. However, since quotas are rarely whole numbers, rounding is necessary, which introduces challenges in achieving true proportionality. Jefferson's method and other apportionment methods seek to address this through various mathematical strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This exercise comes in two parts. Read Part I and answer (a) and (b), then read Part II and answer (c) and (d). Part 1\. The Intergalactic Federation consists of three sovereign planets: Aila, with a population of 5.2 million, Balin, with a population of 15.1 million, and Cona, with a population of 10.6 million. The Intergalactic Parliament has 50 seats that are apportioned among the three planets based on their populations. (a) Find the standard divisor in the Intergalactic Parliament. (b) Find the apportionment of the 50 seats to the three planets under Hamilton's method. Part II. Based on the results of a referendum, the federation expands to include a fourth planet, Dent, with a population of 9.5 million. To account for the additional population the number of seats in the Intergalactic Parliament is increased by 15 to a total of \(65 .[9.5\) million individuals represent approximately 15 seats based on the standard divisor found in (a).] (c) Find the apportionment of the 65 seats to the four planets using Hamilton's method. (d) Which paradox is illustrated by the results of (b) and (c)? Explain

If the standard quota of state \(Y\) is 78.24 , then which of the following apportionments to state \(Y\) is (or are) possible under Hamilton's method? (a) 78.2 or 78.3 (b) 78 or 79 (c) 78 only (d) 79 only (e) any positive integer less than 79

The Bandana Republic is a small country consisting of four states: Apure (population 3,310,000 ), Barinas (population 2,670,000 ), Carabobo (population 1,330,000 ), and Dolores (population 690,000 ). Suppose that there are \(M=160\) seats in the Bandana Congress, to be apportioned among the four states based on their respective populations. (a) Find the standard divisor. (b) Find each state's standard quota.

(a) Explain why, when Jefferson's method is used, any violations of the quota rule must be upper-quota violations. (b) Explain why, when Adams's method is used, any violations of the quota rule must be lower-quota violations. (c) Explain why, in the case of an apportionment problem with two states, violations of the quota rule cannot occur under either Jefferson's or Adams's method. [Hint: Use the results of (a) and (b).

Consider the problem of apportioning \(M=3\) seats between two states, \(A\) and \(B\), using Jefferson's method. Let \(p_{A}\) and Pn denote the populations of \(A\) and \(B\), respectively, Show that if the apportionment under Jefferson's method gives all three seats to \(A\) and none to \(B\), then more than \(75 \%\) of the country's population must live in state \(A\). (Hint. Show that a Jefferson apportionment of 3 and 0 seats implies that \(p_{A}>3 p_{B}=\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.